TooHuman

Differences between revisions 20 and 21
Revision 20 as of 2008-01-30 06:39:46
Size: 2687
Editor: dsl027-181-175
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2008-01-30 18:21:12
Size: 2694
Editor: dsl027-181-175
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 38: Line 38:
* Good but too light. Darker window borders would be better.  * Good but too light. Darker window borders would be better.
Line 40: Line 40:
* I like the widgets but I'm not a fan of OSX style windows. -- George12  * I like the widgets but I'm not a fan of OSX style windows. -- George12
Line 42: Line 42:
* Thanks for the feedback, I will try to make some more within the next few days -- Tom Wright  * Thanks for the feedback, I will try to make some more within the next few days -- Tom Wright
Line 44: Line 44:
* This is the best one I've seen so far,I really want the Hardy style to be something like this -- Mahdee Jameel  * This is the best one I've seen so far,I really want the Hardy style to be something like this -- Mahdee Jameel
Line 46: Line 46:
* I like the softer tones and would like to see this style developed. Who says the desktop has to be visually aggressive?  * I like the softer tones and would like to see this style developed. Who says the desktop has to be visually aggressive?
Line 48: Line 48:
* I think this is a great theme. I'd like to have a style that does not impose itself too much. This one does the job. It is nicely polished and unobtrusive.  * I think this is a great theme. I'd like to have a style that does not impose itself too much. This one does the job. It is nicely polished and unobtrusive.
Line 50: Line 50:
* Can I pick my jaw off the floor now? This is damn-near perfect. The detailing is fun and contemporary without being obtrusive. The clarity of the interface is fantastic and the low-contrast look is much less fatiguing on the eyes. This is a look that also allows for great visuals without relying on graphic effects only available on newer hardware. These are mock-ups, right? Any chance you could make actual GNOME/GTK themes for these so we can see how it works when actually implemented, and whether or not rewrites to GTK/GNOME would be necessary for these to look 'right'? I like the less 'physical' look of this, because I've gotten somewhat sick of the (poorly-executed) Linux look of fake physical objects stacked on top of each other, particularly with 'physical'-looking GTK icons on top of 'physical'-looking buttons. EDIT: I think this would go great with [[../Fela Kuti]] -Sumit  * Can I pick my jaw off the floor now? This is damn-near perfect. The detailing is fun and contemporary without being obtrusive. The clarity of the interface is fantastic and the low-contrast look is much less fatiguing on the eyes. This is a look that also allows for great visuals without relying on graphic effects only available on newer hardware. These are mock-ups, right? Any chance you could make actual GNOME/GTK themes for these so we can see how it works when actually implemented, and whether or not rewrites to GTK/GNOME would be necessary for these to look 'right'? I like the less 'physical' look of this, because I've gotten somewhat sick of the (poorly-executed) Linux look of fake physical objects stacked on top of each other, particularly with 'physical'-looking GTK icons on top of 'physical'-looking buttons. EDIT: I think this would go great with [[../Fela Kuti]] -Sumit

Navigation(slides) Navigation(siblings,1)

Too Human

The idea of the too human theme is that even with a palette of gentile and warm colors you will be able to stun and amaze even OS-X and Vista users.

palette

Anchor(Palette) attachment:palette.png

images

attachment:toohuman.png

made in inkscape - just a rough draft

attachment:button.png attachment:button2.png attachment:greybutton.png attachment:loadingbar.png

wallpaper

attachment:wallpaperthumbnail.png attachment:wallpaperthumbnail2.png

all the .svg's and full size images are in here: attachment:toohuman.tar.bz2

Contributions

[wiki:/?action=AttachFile Attach File]

Include(Artwork/Incoming/SubmissionGuidelines/Guidelines)

Comments

  • Good but too light. Darker window borders would be better.
  • I like the widgets but I'm not a fan of OSX style windows. -- George12
  • Thanks for the feedback, I will try to make some more within the next few days -- Tom Wright
  • This is the best one I've seen so far,I really want the Hardy style to be something like this -- Mahdee Jameel
  • I like the softer tones and would like to see this style developed. Who says the desktop has to be visually aggressive?
  • I think this is a great theme. I'd like to have a style that does not impose itself too much. This one does the job. It is nicely polished and unobtrusive.
  • Can I pick my jaw off the floor now? This is damn-near perfect. The detailing is fun and contemporary without being obtrusive. The clarity of the interface is fantastic and the low-contrast look is much less fatiguing on the eyes. This is a look that also allows for great visuals without relying on graphic effects only available on newer hardware. These are mock-ups, right? Any chance you could make actual GNOME/GTK themes for these so we can see how it works when actually implemented, and whether or not rewrites to GTK/GNOME would be necessary for these to look 'right'? I like the less 'physical' look of this, because I've gotten somewhat sick of the (poorly-executed) Linux look of fake physical objects stacked on top of each other, particularly with 'physical'-looking GTK icons on top of 'physical'-looking buttons. EDIT: I think this would go great with ../Fela Kuti -Sumit

Attachment List

AttachList


CategoryArtwork

Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/TooHuman (last edited 2008-08-06 17:00:09 by localhost)