Ubuntu Wiki

2012-02-02 Meeting (log):

• Meeting with the DMB
  • Everything generally alright.
  • Meetings happening regularly.
  • Less MOTUs applying.
  • Ubuntu Contributing Developer status might be less important. Should it be removed?
• Wiki Teams Page
  • Review Next week (6-10 Feb)
  • Blog on Fridge so community can update any teams they feel are missing
• CoC 2.0
  • Daniel to put up a merge proposal with the proposed text changes
• Voting Services
  • Scott asked if Google App Engine was OK.

2012-02-16 Meeting log):

• Checkup with the IRC Council
  • The new council is doing well, they have had 3 productive meetings
  • made progress on the floodbot code which is now in a launchpad private repository
  • process of welcoming #lubuntu into the list of core channels is well underway with operator training starting soon
  • Things are relatively quiet right now, but channel/operator organization and appeals tend to be the biggest timesinks.
  • have a bit of a list of task to organise around bots

  • Explained the appeals process https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/AppealProcess

  • Considering is to do a training course every release cycle, so they have a regular intake of a batch of new operators
  • another thing we will be doing in 3 months or so is filling the empty 5th seat on the IRCC
• PPA (Personal Package Archive) and CoC (Code of Conduct)

  • Brought up on the launchpad-dev mailing list: RFC: either remove 'Ubuntu CoC signing required' for PPA use, or enforce it consistently

  • Discussed whether there should be a click-through way to sign the CoC (no decision made)
  • Discussed issue of CoC covering all of Launchpad using PPAs or just Ubuntu
  • Agreed that yes we should be enforcing the signing of the CoC for PPA use (individuals AND teams)
• Launchpad Polls
  • Polls are at present a cost to LP with regards to maintenance and it's a feature they are looking to help people move away from

  • Describes some of the issues for users (originally sent to private ubuntu-council-teams list)

  • Need to address privacy concerns while still including individuals who do not share their email address in public in the voting pool