[[DistributedDevelopment]] steering meeting to be held in {{{#ubuntu-meeting}}} on 2011-02-09 at 2100 UTC. = Agenda = * Action items * poolie to send bzr rotation pitch to platform mailing list * poolie to update hot bugs for next meeting * poolie to file bug about MOTD information for out-of-date packages * jam to review spiv's branch for bug 603395 * barry to file bug on debcommit/bzr commit * jam to follow up on pristine-tar stuff :) * LEP [[https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BuildFromBranchIntoPrimary]] * Package importer progress * Bugs of interest: * See https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html * bzr branches are too expensive to use for casual sponsoring, compared with downloading packages from my local mirror (slangasek) * [[https://launchpad.net/bugs/295274|watch file support]] * [[https://launchpad.net/bugs/653307|Import fails with missing referenced chk root keys]] * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/603395|bzr commit in a heavyweight checkout does not propagate new tags]] * [[https://launchpad.net/bugs/499684|Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent and not well documented]] * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/609187|bzr branch lp:ubuntu/foo should warn when foo is out of date]] * AOB = Summary = * The package importer is progressing well. It was a bit disrupted by the wheezy release but we're fixing things from that and it should happy again soon. * mbp sent out a Canonical-internal invitation to do an engineering rotation to work on UDD. * Canonical's Bazaar team is tracking their short-list of work on https://bugs.launchpad.net/~canonical-bazaar/+assignedbugs and we'll use the kanban at https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html (sorry private atm) to monitor it * Working on https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BuildFromBranchIntoPrimary = New Actions = * poolie to advertise udd projects to non-staff contributors * poolie to integrate jml's feedback into lep * poolie to meet with allison re lep * poolie to meet with robbiew re lep * jam to propose/report plan for quilt imports * poolie forward/link to https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/ComponentReleasesWithBzr = Log = {{{ Feb 10 07:57:29 --> You are now talking on #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 07:57:29 --- Topic for #ubuntu-meeting is Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs Feb 10 07:57:29 --- Topic for #ubuntu-meeting set by cody-somerville!~cody-some@ubuntu/member/somerville32 at Tue Jan 4 06:23:23 2011 Feb 10 07:57:30 -ChanServ- [#ubuntu-meeting] Welcome to #ubuntu-meeting. This channel is logged. Use of this channel implies acceptance of terms at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/TermsOfService Feb 10 07:59:14 <-- plars has quit (Quit: plars) Feb 10 08:01:05 hi Feb 10 08:01:17 Ubuntu DistributedDevelopment meeting starting now; all welcome Feb 10 08:01:48 #startmeeting Feb 10 08:01:49 Meeting started at 15:01. The chair is poolie. Feb 10 08:01:49 Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] Feb 10 08:01:54 * slangasek waves Feb 10 08:02:05 me Feb 10 08:02:14 hi slangasek Feb 10 08:02:20 [topic] attendees Feb 10 08:02:21 New Topic: attendees Feb 10 08:02:25 hi jelmer, slangasek Feb 10 08:02:32 barry sent apologies Feb 10 08:03:00 listening in Feb 10 08:03:10 james_w, hi? Feb 10 08:03:15 hi Feb 10 08:03:23 <-- brianchidester_ has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat) Feb 10 08:03:30 sorry I'm late :-) Feb 10 08:03:35 --> jam (~jameinel@adsl-75-51-62-134.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:03:35 np :) Feb 10 08:03:50 agenda is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/20110209#preview Feb 10 08:03:50 hi Feb 10 08:03:53 [topic] action items Feb 10 08:03:55 New Topic: action items Feb 10 08:04:03 * poolie to send bzr rotation pitch to platform mailing list Feb 10 08:04:11 done! Feb 10 08:04:15 I do believe I saw that \o/ Feb 10 08:04:19 actually i sent it to canonical-tech Feb 10 08:04:21 want to try it? Feb 10 08:04:29 i got one response already, which is good Feb 10 08:04:38 perhaps i should forward it to ubuntu-platform? Feb 10 08:04:39 cool Feb 10 08:04:47 poolie: "want to try it"? try what? Feb 10 08:04:49 I would Feb 10 08:04:55 working on bzr :) Feb 10 08:04:55 jam, try a rotation to the bzr team? Feb 10 08:04:56 ok Feb 10 08:04:58 ah Feb 10 08:05:12 sure, I'll rotate to bzr for 6 months Feb 10 08:05:14 <-- ian_brasil has quit (Quit: ian_brasil) Feb 10 08:05:21 i wonder if we can send a similar invitation to non-canonical-staff? Feb 10 08:05:30 just as a thing they might be interested to work on Feb 10 08:05:37 perhaps a post that gets to the planet is best Feb 10 08:05:50 yeah, I think that would be best Feb 10 08:05:55 [action] poolie to forward to ubuntu-platform Feb 10 08:05:56 ACTION received: poolie to forward to ubuntu-platform Feb 10 08:06:07 [action] poolie to advertise udd projects to non-staff contributors Feb 10 08:06:09 ACTION received: poolie to advertise udd projects to non-staff contributors Feb 10 08:06:11 posting with things to do and ways to get started can help Feb 10 08:06:16 right Feb 10 08:06:20 * poolie to update hot bugs for next meeting Feb 10 08:06:23 done Feb 10 08:06:53 we're now using assignment to to track our short list Feb 10 08:06:55 poolie: is that just ~canonical-bazaar, or is there a different list of 'hot' bugs? Feb 10 08:07:04 i think just that's enough Feb 10 08:07:13 and that also shows up in https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html Feb 10 08:07:18 --> brianchidester (~brianchid@nat/canonical/x-jufetrtfyhdxnwvy) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:07:23 which i propose we use to review them in a bit Feb 10 08:07:41 to review which particular bugs are listed, and whether anything else should be Feb 10 08:07:55 any comments on this? Feb 10 08:08:33 poolie: So we use that to track our hot bugs list, then reassign to a specific person when we actually start hacking? Feb 10 08:08:48 correct Feb 10 08:08:56 the kanban shows bugs assigned to the team or its members Feb 10 08:09:03 it would be nice to show this in lp itself too Feb 10 08:09:12 (i wonder if there's a bug for that) Feb 10 08:09:45 ok, moving on Feb 10 08:09:47 poolie, is that assigned list *the* queue to work from? Feb 10 08:09:55 yes, it is Feb 10 08:10:01 ok Feb 10 08:10:19 so we should prioritise and put the most important in that list, and drop things that aren't that important? Feb 10 08:10:20 people can also take reactive/opportunistic/itch-scratching bugs of course, but they should be taking a lot of work from there Feb 10 08:10:21 over time I mean Feb 10 08:10:37 with the caveat that bugs they've specifically individually taken from that page won't show up Feb 10 08:10:45 as i mentioned above Feb 10 08:10:47 correct, we should Feb 10 08:10:59 i hope during the bug review phase of this meeting we'll do some of that Feb 10 08:11:13 ok Feb 10 08:11:15 thanks Feb 10 08:11:16 every fortnight Feb 10 08:11:20 * poolie to file bug about MOTD information for out-of-date packages Feb 10 08:11:21 done Feb 10 08:12:03 but not assigned? Feb 10 08:12:24 there was also a very old bug by spiv, perhaps that should be marked as a dupe? Feb 10 08:12:36 --> plars (~plars@75-27-136-242.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:12:36 <-- plars has quit (Changing host) Feb 10 08:12:37 --> plars (~plars@ubuntu/member/plars) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:12:44 bug 121201 Feb 10 08:12:45 Launchpad bug 121201 in Bazaar "Allow servers to give clients a MOTD" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121201 Feb 10 08:13:05 <-- dharman has quit (Remote host closed the connection) Feb 10 08:13:29 it seems like we could use that to implement this Feb 10 08:14:25 --> Sp4rKy_ (~Sp4rKy@rennes1.dunnewind.net) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:14:28 <-- Sp4rKy_ has quit (Client Quit) Feb 10 08:14:34 ok Feb 10 08:14:35 https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/609187 Feb 10 08:14:38 Ubuntu bug 609187 in Ubuntu Distributed Development "bzr branch lp:ubuntu/foo should warn when foo is out of date" [High,Triaged] Feb 10 08:14:45 and it actually is assigned Feb 10 08:14:47 and barry filed it Feb 10 08:15:22 ah, ok Feb 10 08:16:35 <-- vmlintu has quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) Feb 10 08:16:37 poolie: next? Feb 10 08:16:47 * jam to review spiv's branch for bug 603395 Feb 10 08:16:49 Launchpad bug 603395 in Bazaar "bzr commit in a heavyweight checkout does not propagate new tags" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603395 Feb 10 08:16:58 I didn't get to it, but poolie did, so still done Feb 10 08:17:02 i know spiv did some of them Feb 10 08:17:06 but the bug's still open? Feb 10 08:17:45 anyhow, spiv seems to be progressing on it Feb 10 08:17:47 * barry to file bug on debcommit/bzr commit Feb 10 08:17:53 i think he did Feb 10 08:17:57 poolie: the line-item was about the review, not closing the bug.... Feb 10 08:18:08 right, it doesn't require review now anyhow Feb 10 08:18:14 spiv fixed a bunch of related bugs Feb 10 08:18:17 * barry to file bug on debcommit/bzr commit Feb 10 08:18:18 --> exalt (~exalt@dhcp-077-250-063-213.chello.nl) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:18:20 blah Feb 10 08:18:25 * jam to follow up on pristine-tar stuff Feb 10 08:18:38 poolie: I know barry talked about debcommit, I didn't see a bug on it Feb 10 08:18:52 poolie: pristine-tar was updated, many packages fixed, a small handful still failing Feb 10 08:18:57 so done for that level Feb 10 08:19:03 it is no longer the #1 failure in the importer Feb 10 08:19:30 anything more to do? Feb 10 08:19:59 poolie: we've done what that item was meant to be. I think investigating future failing imports is just regular stuff Feb 10 08:20:01 ok Feb 10 08:20:08 [topic] LEP https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BuildFromBranchIntoPrimary Feb 10 08:20:09 New Topic: LEP https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BuildFromBranchIntoPrimary Feb 10 08:20:23 we have a lep proposing our major feature here Feb 10 08:20:32 i have some questions from jml to fill it out a bit more Feb 10 08:20:45 [action] poolie to integrate jml's feedback into lep Feb 10 08:20:47 ACTION received: poolie to integrate jml's feedback into lep Feb 10 08:20:52 [action] poolie to meet with allison re lep Feb 10 08:20:53 ACTION received: poolie to meet with allison re lep Feb 10 08:21:00 [action] poolie to meet with robbiew re lep Feb 10 08:21:02 ACTION received: poolie to meet with robbiew re lep Feb 10 08:21:19 huh? Feb 10 08:21:19 we need to get it triaged for launchpad if we want a feature squad to work on it Feb 10 08:21:25 :) hi Feb 10 08:21:41 i have an action to show you https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/BuildFromBranchIntoPrimary and see what you say :) Feb 10 08:21:50 ah..cool Feb 10 08:21:56 sorry to interrupt ;) Feb 10 08:22:01 * robbiew goes back into his cave Feb 10 08:22:06 <-- cariboo907 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) Feb 10 08:22:45 np, consider yourself shown Feb 10 08:23:05 can we set a time separately to look at it, or could you just mail me feedback? Feb 10 08:23:20 ("i don't understand what you're talking about" is ok feedback if that's the case) Feb 10 08:24:15 ok Feb 10 08:24:22 [topic] Package importer progress Feb 10 08:24:23 New Topic: Package importer progress Feb 10 08:24:49 the big thing here is that we went through the wheezy release, which caused a bunch of disruption Feb 10 08:24:53 including bug 715000 Feb 10 08:24:55 Launchpad bug 715000 in Bazaar 2.3 "Stacking is not fully transitive" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/715000 Feb 10 08:25:01 the fix for which should be deployed today Feb 10 08:25:07 i think after that we can restart the importer Feb 10 08:25:20 in fact, probably we could restart it now, but it might give the importer indigestion Feb 10 08:25:40 is that being rolled out to jubany as well? Feb 10 08:25:55 the fixed bzr? Feb 10 08:26:14 james_w: aiui jubany doesn't care Feb 10 08:26:17 lp does Feb 10 08:26:18 it probably should be, but i haven't specifically seen it fail there Feb 10 08:26:33 package_import.py doesn't trigger that code path that was having problems with double stacking Feb 10 08:26:34 yeah, the fixed bzr Feb 10 08:26:38 i think it only affects log on a doubly-stacked branch Feb 10 08:26:47 ok, if you've verified then I'm happy Feb 10 08:26:57 i think we should just wait for it to be in 2.3.1 or 2.4b1 and then roll that out Feb 10 08:27:01 it /does/ do some interrogation of branches over hpss though Feb 10 08:27:07 ok Feb 10 08:27:12 james_w: it affects rev_id => dotted_revno code, but I don't think you hit that in importing. Feb 10 08:27:20 --> noy (~Noy@wesnoth/developer/noy) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:27:26 are we ok to just fix it if it fails? Feb 10 08:27:28 see get_unimported_revisions or roundabout Feb 10 08:27:44 if that's how you want to do it then I'm fine with that Feb 10 08:27:48 poolie: I agree, I think if we see package imports failing, it just becomes a high priority to roll out the code on jubany Feb 10 08:28:04 i'll add a task Feb 10 08:28:36 i think the wheezy addition has caused a bump in the number of failures Feb 10 08:28:43 at any rate the graph has gone up Feb 10 08:28:51 hopefully once this is all done it will be back down Feb 10 08:29:02 i am pleased by the increasing amount of work on the importer Feb 10 08:29:11 poolie: is there another bug to restack deb branches to sid? Feb 10 08:29:25 which is also a workaround for this ug Feb 10 08:29:26 bug Feb 10 08:29:30 since you don't end up with double-stacking Feb 10 08:29:36 also under that heading, i made a plan with charlies and mthaddon that we'll move it to pepo and (if possible) give up login access on the 1st of March Feb 10 08:29:45 --> chilicuil (~chilicuil@unaffiliated/chilicuil) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:29:47 i think there is Feb 10 08:30:01 wrt the importer... where is that code published? I don't see any links to the code from http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/ or https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment Feb 10 08:30:12 slangasek: lp:udd Feb 10 08:30:13 good question Feb 10 08:30:15 ah Feb 10 08:30:31 if this could be linked more prominently, perhaps it would help with getting extra-canonical folks involved Feb 10 08:30:39 excellent point Feb 10 08:30:56 i'll file abug Feb 10 08:30:58 slangasek: tbh, I doubt it, but I'm happy for it to be more prominently linked Feb 10 08:31:26 jam: maybe it is wishful thinking... there've been a few importer bugs that I would've been keen to at least look at, if I'd been able to find the code more readily :) Feb 10 08:31:35 it's true Feb 10 08:31:52 most of the import code itself is in bzr-builddeb, but sure Feb 10 08:32:09 we can say that too Feb 10 08:32:23 bug 716123, marked easy Feb 10 08:32:27 Launchpad bug 716123 in Ubuntu Distributed Development "web page should tell where to get the source" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/716123 Feb 10 08:32:53 any other comments on the package importer? Feb 10 08:33:16 <-- lifeless has quit (Quit: leaving) Feb 10 08:33:54 poolie: I'm poking around trying to get feedback for how people want imports to look, especially wrt quilt imports Feb 10 08:34:04 true Feb 10 08:34:08 thanks for doing that Feb 10 08:34:16 it's looking like they really should be imported to looms Feb 10 08:34:21 yeah, I think quilt imports will be important Feb 10 08:34:33 yeah, but that still leaves us with "and what does that actually mean" :) Feb 10 08:34:42 also, that wouldn't strictly block a switchover Feb 10 08:34:47 so i'm not 100% sure what the importance is Feb 10 08:35:06 The discussion has been very useful for me to start understanding what is actually going on, though. Feb 10 08:35:14 (http://paste.ubuntu.com/565180/ is what the importer does over hpss, so I think it should be fine) Feb 10 08:35:46 james_w: it isn't strictly an hpss thing, any double-stacked branch will fail during log, etc (even purely locally) Feb 10 08:35:50 jam: Yeah :) Feb 10 08:35:54 shall we add an action for next time for you to summarize where we got to? Feb 10 08:36:01 poolie: sure Feb 10 08:36:05 jam, right, but we talk over hpss to LP, which has some double stacked branches Feb 10 08:36:05 --> jjohansen (~jj@pool-74-107-151-238.ptldor.fios.verizon.net) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:36:05 sounds like a good action item Feb 10 08:36:20 [topic] jam to propose/report plan for quilt imports Feb 10 08:36:21 New Topic: jam to propose/report plan for quilt imports Feb 10 08:36:27 incidentally, i'm going to be on leave 2 weeks from today Feb 10 08:36:30 just for a long weekend Feb 10 08:36:38 everything else is done locally with no stacking, apart from fetch, which we know is fine Feb 10 08:36:58 s/topic/action/? Feb 10 08:36:59 moving on Feb 10 08:37:07 you're right Feb 10 08:37:11 [action] jam to propose/report plan for quilt imports Feb 10 08:37:12 ACTION received: jam to propose/report plan for quilt imports Feb 10 08:37:19 [topic] hot bug review Feb 10 08:37:20 New Topic: hot bug review Feb 10 08:37:26 should that be 'revue'? :) Feb 10 08:37:32 [url] https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html Feb 10 08:37:48 that's a bit large to read the whole thing Feb 10 08:37:57 [link] https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html Feb 10 08:37:57 LINK received: https://devpad.canonical.com/~mbp/kanban/bzr-kanban.html Feb 10 08:38:06 but i think it may be a good way to track whether we're working on the right htings Feb 10 08:38:23 poolie, I'll start referring to you all as the bzr troupe Feb 10 08:38:25 so let's focus on things near the top (critical/high) and in the middle (in progress etc) Feb 10 08:38:57 poolie: when did we start getting big red ! ? Feb 10 08:39:03 and what does that actually mean? Feb 10 08:39:04 today, apparently Feb 10 08:39:08 jamu must have added it Feb 10 08:39:16 "in review for more than 3 days" Feb 10 08:39:17 jam: it looks like the time the bug has been in progress Feb 10 08:39:25 or in progress for more than 7 days Feb 10 08:39:43 i kind of envy landscape if it's a big (!) for something to take more than 7 days Feb 10 08:39:52 but perhaps we can get there too if we reduce our wip Feb 10 08:39:57 what's the process for moving from needs testing -> verified? I was all ready to jump on testing bug #706990, I see someone has already followed up to the bug to say it's fixed Feb 10 08:40:00 Launchpad bug 706990 in Bazaar Git Plugin "git-import fails on remote repository with AttributeError: 'RemoteGitRepository' object has no attribute '_git'" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/706990 Feb 10 08:40:17 slangasek, there's a key at the bottom Feb 10 08:40:29 aha Feb 10 08:40:43 this has been good to work on with jkakar btw Feb 10 08:41:05 bug 702024 should be good for making lp rollouts less disruptive Feb 10 08:41:08 Launchpad bug 702024 in Launchpad itself "Restarting codehosting SSH server drops existing connections" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702024 Feb 10 08:41:30 so, what should we do here? Feb 10 08:41:41 --> cariboo907 (~jimk@unaffiliated/cariboo907) has joined #ubuntu-meeting Feb 10 08:41:46 are there particular bugs that ought to be on here but aren't? Feb 10 08:41:57 should we go back to having the meeting review ~10 top bugs? Feb 10 08:42:12 perhaps we should look at the critical bugs? Feb 10 08:42:23 slangasek: some projects (not bzr) use Fix Committed vs Fix Released, which changes only once there is a full release, not sure that you can release packages, but you could poke the upstreams Feb 10 08:42:25 i think we have a few too many bugs altogether in-process at the moment Feb 10 08:42:45 but i think if we pay attention it will go down Feb 10 08:43:30 jam: oh, well, I can at least set the tag on the bugs if things prove ok in my own testing :) Feb 10 08:43:53 of the bugs mentioned in the previous meeting, all of them are assigned or done, except bug 499684 is assigned to barry Feb 10 08:43:55 Launchpad bug 499684 in bzr-builddeb "Interface to dpkg-buildpackage inconsistent and not well documented" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/499684 Feb 10 08:44:02 s//assigned to canonical-bazaar Feb 10 08:44:38 <-- joaopinto has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) Feb 10 08:45:31 ok, moving on Feb 10 08:45:36 [topic] any other business? Feb 10 08:45:37 New Topic: any other business? Feb 10 08:45:52 poolie: there is a ton of bugs in there on projects that aren't bzr, and thus don't conform to our bug triage standards Feb 10 08:45:59 I'm not sure how kanban should interpret that Feb 10 08:46:47 poolie: I can share some happy news if you like Feb 10 08:46:53 note that *everything* in Verified is assigned to jelmer Feb 10 08:47:06 yes, i think he started doing things that way after i set this up Feb 10 08:47:10 perhaps to see how it works Feb 10 08:47:16 i think we can fudge it Feb 10 08:47:19 slangasek, please do Feb 10 08:47:29 I wrote up https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/ComponentReleasesWithBzr last week with some recipes for using UDD branches within Linaro, and am seeing some good uptake by the team Feb 10 08:47:47 the bad news is that I think I've found every single bug in bzr-git :-) Feb 10 08:47:48 yeah, I'd be happy to see Verified gone.. I was just seeing how things worked Feb 10 08:48:18 so there are now some official UDD branches in Launchpad with some very rich git history attached Feb 10 08:49:03 slangasek, wow, that's great, thanks very much Feb 10 08:49:20 let's make sure those bugs get escalated and addressed Feb 10 08:49:34 jelmer, i wonder if it would be good for you to pair on fixing those bugs with say vila Feb 10 08:49:41 to spread the love around Feb 10 08:49:52 mm, i don't know -what- time zone you're in though :) Feb 10 08:49:53 poolie: the bzr-git bugs? I'd be happy to Feb 10 08:50:00 maybe you overlap more with jam? Feb 10 08:50:10 poolie: in a month it will be the same :) Feb 10 08:50:51 slangasek: are these all related to pushing into git, or fetching as well? Feb 10 08:50:59 jelmer: fetching Feb 10 08:51:47 jelmer: 706990 is certainly one I ran into; I've also been dancing on the bleeding edge with qemu-linaro, which has submodule references upstream Feb 10 08:51:48 slangasek, so if they're blocking your work on this, please make sure they're at least High Feb 10 08:51:56 slangasek: perhaps we should bump the importance of some bugs Feb 10 08:51:57 and assigned to someone Feb 10 08:52:13 (or if you can't actually triage/assign, just comment asking for it) Feb 10 08:52:16 nothing blocking currently as I've routed around the damage in the recipes - but I'm happy to highlight the bugs for your consideration Feb 10 08:52:27 please do Feb 10 08:53:07 that page is really nice Feb 10 08:53:11 who should I feed the list to? (I can't bump bug priorities myself) Feb 10 08:53:33 you can mail it to ubuntu-distributed-devel or you can comment on the bugs Feb 10 08:53:41 ok Feb 10 08:53:41 whichever is easier Feb 10 08:54:16 you could forward a link to that page too Feb 10 08:54:25 will do Feb 10 08:54:27 any other feedback from people who've used it? Feb 10 08:54:58 <-- jhunt has quit (Quit: leaving) Feb 10 08:55:32 [action] poolie forward/link to https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/ComponentReleasesWithBzr Feb 10 08:55:33 ACTION received: poolie forward/link to https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/ComponentReleasesWithBzr Feb 10 08:55:54 I asked John Rigby to file a bug on bzr-git for his experience of "bzr branch ran for a really long time and then crashed", dunno if he's gotten around to it yet :) Feb 10 08:56:05 otherwise the feedback has been positive Feb 10 08:56:08 good Feb 10 08:56:23 please do get people to file bugs, especially if they can get a traceback and/or -Dhpss trace Feb 10 08:56:32 we don't fix them all right away but we are fixing a lot of them Feb 10 08:56:41 ack Feb 10 08:56:47 ok, i think that's it Feb 10 08:57:03 happy hacking, everyone Feb 10 08:57:16 i'll be on leave from the 23rd and back on the 2nd Feb 10 08:57:31 #ends Feb 10 08:57:47 #endmeeting Feb 10 08:57:49 Meeting finished at 15:57. Feb 10 08:57:53 thanks, all :) Feb 10 09:00:43 thanks }}}