EpiphanyDefaultBrowser

Differences between revisions 2 and 3
⇤ ← Revision 2 as of 2005-08-17 10:14:11 →
Size: 1106
Editor: 125-25
Comment:
← Revision 3 as of 2005-08-17 10:20:52 → ⇥
Size: 2569
Editor: CPE-60-231-176-112
Comment: Updated with more points for both sides
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is an open discussion about wheter or not we must consider Epiphany as a default browser instead of Firefox.
This page has not to be considered before Breezy release.		 This page is an open discussion about whether or not to consider Epiphany as a default browser instead of Firefox.
This page has not to be considered before Breezy release, and is aimed at Breezy+1.
Line 4: Line 4:
!! Warning !! This page is not endorsed by any Ubuntu developper and is only an open discussion. There is no official plan to replace Firefox by Epiphany. '''Note''': This page is not endorsed by any Ubuntu developper and is only an open discussion. There is no official plan to replace Firefox by Epiphany.
Line 20: Line 20:
 * ...
== In favor of Epiphany as the default ==
 * Epiphany is well integrated with the Gnome desktop and follow the global theme and global options (like displaying text beside buttons, Gnome proxy, etc)
 * Epiphany follows the gnome release schedule
 * Epiphanyy's tab handling is better than Firefox's (although this is set to change when Firefox 1.5 arrives, and is improved by some Firefox extensions)
Line 24: Line 29:
 * ...  * Firefox has some widely-installed extensions that Epiphany has no equivalent for (yet). The most commonly referred-to one is Adblock - although Epiphany has a plan for an equivalent http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany_2fAdBlockExtension
 * Having Firefox will help ease transition for users of Windows and MacOS, as Firefox is available on those platforms

== General points ==
 * Firefox contains more "power user" features, which could be argued as a good point by both sides.
 * Firefox supports keywords in the address bar "google something", whereas in Epiphany "keymarks / smart bookmarks" appear as a dropdown menu
Line 27: Line 37:
 * Epiphany depend on Firefox, so in any case Firefox must be installed.  * Epiphany currently depends on Firefox, so in Firefox must be installed to have Epiphany. This could be dealt with by creating a seperate Gecko package, which Firefox, Epiphany, Galeon, Mozilla, et cetera depend on.

== Related Links ==
 * Epiphany-Firefox comparison on Epiphany site http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany_2fFirefoxComparision
 * "Should Firefox be the default Gnome browser"? http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany_2fFrequentlyAskedQuestions#head-ba622057b4fb0e671c16b6d9868912f8af22bec0

This page is an open discussion about whether or not to consider Epiphany as a default browser instead of Firefox. This page has not to be considered before Breezy release, and is aimed at Breezy+1.

Note: This page is not endorsed by any Ubuntu developper and is only an open discussion. There is no official plan to replace Firefox by Epiphany.

What must be a default browser ?

A default browser must be simple enough and doesn't need a lot of features by default. (to complete)

What think the average Joe user about Epihany or Firefox ?

Most of average users don't care at all. In fact, they don't see any difference if you ask them.

In favor of Epiphany as the default

  • Epiphany is well integrated with the Gnome desktop and follow the global theme and global options (like displaying text beside buttons,etc)
  • Epiphany follows the gnome release schedule

In favor of Epiphany as the default

  • Epiphany is well integrated with the Gnome desktop and follow the global theme and global options (like displaying text beside buttons, Gnome proxy, etc)
  • Epiphany follows the gnome release schedule
  • Epiphanyy's tab handling is better than Firefox's (although this is set to change when Firefox 1.5 arrives, and is improved by some Firefox extensions)

In favor of Firefox as the default

  • Firefox is well known and "hype"

  • Firefox has some widely-installed extensions that Epiphany has no equivalent for (yet). The most commonly referred-to one is Adblock - although Epiphany has a plan for an equivalent http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany_2fAdBlockExtension

  • Having Firefox will help ease transition for users of Windows and MacOS, as Firefox is available on those platforms

General points

  • Firefox contains more "power user" features, which could be argued as a good point by both sides.
  • Firefox supports keywords in the address bar "google something", whereas in Epiphany "keymarks / smart bookmarks" appear as a dropdown menu

Outstanding issues with Epiphany

  • Epiphany currently depends on Firefox, so in Firefox must be installed to have Epiphany. This could be dealt with by creating a seperate Gecko package, which Firefox, Epiphany, Galeon, Mozilla, et cetera depend on.

EpiphanyDefaultBrowser (last edited 2008-08-06 16:20:54 by localhost)