Fonts

Differences between revisions 2 and 3
⇤ ← Revision 2 as of 2006-03-22 08:48:04 →
Size: 469
Editor: CPE0010a728396a-CM0012c90d0c82
Comment:
← Revision 3 as of 2006-03-22 08:51:41 → ⇥
Size: 487
Editor: CPE0010a728396a-CM0012c90d0c82
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
I'm currently working on font settings in XML (''.fonts.conf''). I noticed that after installing ''msttcorefonts'' things don't look quite as good anymore. Most web pages request ''Arial'' which doesn't get hinted and anti-aliased too nicely, especially on LCD screens. I personally prefer the "sharp" non-anti-aliased look. I also noticed that many users coming from Windows(R) ask on the forums about getting fonts to look that way. I'm currently working on font settings in XML (''.fonts.conf''). I noticed that after installing ''msttcorefonts'' things don't look quite as good in ''Firefox'' anymore. Most web pages request ''Arial'' which doesn't get hinted and anti-aliased too nicely, especially on LCD screens. I personally prefer the "sharp" non-anti-aliased look. I also noticed that many users coming from ''Windows®'' ask on the forums about getting fonts to look that way.

I'm currently working on font settings in XML (.fonts.conf). I noticed that after installing msttcorefonts things don't look quite as good in Firefox anymore. Most web pages request Arial which doesn't get hinted and anti-aliased too nicely, especially on LCD screens. I personally prefer the "sharp" non-anti-aliased look. I also noticed that many users coming from Windows® ask on the forums about getting fonts to look that way.

Fonts (last edited 2018-10-21 04:17:23 by zhangweiwu)