GerfriedFuchs

Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2010-06-30 20:21:46
Size: 4789
Editor: chello080108033196
Comment: use MOTU template
Revision 4 as of 2010-06-30 22:02:07
Size: 5764
Editor: 94-192-74-78
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 65: Line 65:
== IainLane ==
=== General feedback ===

I've no doubt advocating this MOTU application. Rhonda is a very experienced DD who shows a clear willingness to improve maintained packages in Ubuntu. We need more DDs willing to do this, and should encourage such folks to join us wherever they show interest. In addition, there is solid evidence of excellent social integration; Rhonda hangs out in #ubuntu-motu and #debian-ubuntu and gives valuable advice to those seeking help. Clear +1.

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
We are going to give a joint session at the upcoming UDW; that Rhonda volunteered (or was volunteered ;) for this speaks to a positive attitude towards Ubuntu development.

I'm sure there have been other interactions that I can't remember too.

=== Areas of Improvement ===
Get to know the Ubuntu development processes better. I've no doubt that Rhonda will ask questions if unsure and that this experience will come with time.

I, Gerfried Fuchs, apply for MOTU.

Name

Gerfried Fuchs

Launchpad Page

https://launchpad.net/~rhonda

Wiki Page

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GerfriedFuchs

Who I am

I am a Debian Developer since June 2000 and was involved in various different areas since. I maintain a fair amount of packages, am part of the Debian Webmaster team and am trying to minimize the amount of open security issues in lenny-backports. I am also admin for the Games Team (Games Team in Debian wiki, Games Team in Launchpad).

My Ubuntu story

I maintain a fair amount of packages within Debian and got feedback from some users about issues with my packages in Ubuntu. This got me interested to subscribe to the derivates keyword on the Debian PTS to receive ubuntu diffs for my packages, and started to go through the launchpad bugs of my packages, closing them when they were invalid and try to address them in my packages. I also approached people who were producing Ubuntu diffs for my packages to be invited to forward them to me so the diff isn't needed and reduce the workload in Ubuntu.

Examples of my work / Things I'm proud of

I am tracking the bugreports of my packages not only in Debian but also in Ubuntu. I managed to convince some people that it is actually worthwhile to forward bugs to Debian to recude the workload within Ubuntu because there is no need for merge requests anymore and checking wether they still apply cleanly. Also I am known for regularly answer questions on IRC (#ubuntu-motu, #debian-ubuntu). I also do some translation work through launchpad.

Areas of work

I have a fair amount of package in Debian to care of, but I am also admin for the Games Team (combined Debian/Ubuntu group), both in Debian and in Launchpad, and I joined the German translation team in launchpad, taking care of at least gtg translation but scanning through others too from time to time.

Things I could do better

I am still in learning stage of the procedures but I am usually quickly picking up stuff that I use regularly, and am not afraid to ask before potential doing something not reversible.

Plans for the future

General

I'd like to reduce the diversity between Ubuntu and Debian more, especially in the packages that I maintain or am interested in (e.g. the Games Team packages). Along that lines I try to track bugreports against said package groups and suggest backports where they are considered helpful to the user base.

What I like least in Ubuntu

That the packages.ubuntu.com website still doesn't properly offer maverick support (or lucid-proposed and lucid-backports, FWIW), even though the fix is pretty straight forward. Wink ;)


Comments

If you'd like to comment, but are not the applicant or a sponsor, do it here. Don't forget to sign with @SIG@.


Endorsements

As a sponsor, just copy the template below, fill it out and add it to this section.

ScottKitterman

General feedback

I have had general contact with Rhonda for quite some time in Debian and on matters of Debian/Ubuntu integration. I've also observed a lot of helpful and positive interactions on #ubuntu-motu with people trying to learn packaging for Ubuntu and people wanting to connect with Debian. As a long time DD, I've no doubt at all of Rhonda's technical skill. I see good social integration and a clear willingness to ask questions when needed. Definite +1 from me.

Specific Experiences of working together

Recently we worked together on getting wesnoth-1.8 into Ubuntu Lucid befor release and then backported for Karmic.

Areas of Improvement

There are still elements of Ubuntu specific procedure that could no doubt use more experience, but I'm comfortable with where things are now.

IainLane

General feedback

I've no doubt advocating this MOTU application. Rhonda is a very experienced DD who shows a clear willingness to improve maintained packages in Ubuntu. We need more DDs willing to do this, and should encourage such folks to join us wherever they show interest. In addition, there is solid evidence of excellent social integration; Rhonda hangs out in #ubuntu-motu and #debian-ubuntu and gives valuable advice to those seeking help. Clear +1.

Specific Experiences of working together

We are going to give a joint session at the upcoming UDW; that Rhonda volunteered (or was volunteered Wink ;) for this speaks to a positive attitude towards Ubuntu development.

I'm sure there have been other interactions that I can't remember too.

Areas of Improvement

Get to know the Ubuntu development processes better. I've no doubt that Rhonda will ask questions if unsure and that this experience will come with time.


TEMPLATE

== <SPONSORS NAME> ==
=== General feedback ===
## Please fill us in on your shared experience. (How many packages did you sponsor? How would you judge the quality? How would you describe the improvements? Do you trust the applicant?)

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
''Please add good examples of your work together, but also cases that could have handled better.''
=== Areas of Improvement ===

GerfriedFuchs (last edited 2011-05-17 06:52:22 by 213)