Please check the status of this specification in Launchpad before editing it. If it is Approved, contact the Assignee or another knowledgeable person before making changes.
Launchpad Entry: grub-configuration-improvements
Packages affected: ucf, grub
/boot/grub/menu.lst is the single file where all boot-time options are configured for installed i386 and amd64 systems. Ubuntu must support package-initiated updates (for installation of new kernel packages) without silently discarding user-initiated config changes.
User-modified grub menu.lst files will trigger conflict-resolution dialog on kernel upgrade: previously, if a user edited the bootloader configuration in /boot/grub/menu.lst directly, these changes might be silently lost when a new kernel was installed. The new version of the grub package detects when such changes have been made, and will ask users to resolve this conflict manually when a kernel package is installed.
/boot/grub/menu.lst is the canonical upstream location where changes are made to the configuration for the grub bootloader. Third-party documentation and how-tos will document that users should edit this file in order to make changes to their boot configuration. However, the current behavior of update-grub is to replace the kernel boot stanzas with stanzas auto-generated from magic comments stored at the top of this file. This will overwrite configuration changes made by the user, and may result in a non-working bootloader configuration or a non-working kernel configuration.
This is reported as [https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/103297 bug #103297] against grub.
You can have subsections that better describe specific parts of the issue.
This section should describe a plan of action (the "how") to implement the changes discussed. Could include subsections like:
Should cover changes required to the UI, or specific UI that is required to implement this
Code changes should include an overview of what needs to change, and in some cases even the specific details.
- data migration, if any
- redirects from old URLs to new ones, if any
- how users will be pointed to the new way of doing things, if necessary.
It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during CD testing, and to show off after release.
This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.
This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.
BoF agenda and discussion
Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.