IrcOperatorMeetingAgenda
Differences between revisions 2 and 10 (spanning 8 versions)
|
Size: 588
Comment:
|
Size: 624
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| The IRC ops meeting will be at dec. 20, 18:00 UTC | The IRC ops meeting will be at Jan. 30, 21:00 UTC |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| * Operator guidelines * Kick/ban/abuse policy * "Op wars" * #ubuntu-ops policy * Appeal process * Keep it private? * Logging? * Channel access policy * "Leads" for derivatives should have level 30 * Who are the leads? * IRC Council * Paul has left, the vacancy needs to be filled * Nominations now, voting on the mailinglist * Transparency in meetings? * Bots * more people with control access * Bantracker logs public? * ubuntu/member/ cloaks * Any other issues |
* Nominations (and hopefully vote) for the IRC council * ''Please add yourself as nominee here if you want to join the council'' * I'm willing to undertake this, but will be unable to attend this meeting. -- MelissaDraper (elkbuntu) * Which processes should really be written down? * Appointing operators * Dealing with abuse from operators * Regularity of discussion * Do we want to have IRC meetings like this scheduled regularly regardless of obvious concerns, or a monthly e-mail asking for feedback, or anything like that? |
The IRC ops meeting will be at Jan. 30, 21:00 UTC
Points to discuss:
- Nominations (and hopefully vote) for the IRC council
Please add yourself as nominee here if you want to join the council
I'm willing to undertake this, but will be unable to attend this meeting. -- MelissaDraper (elkbuntu)
- Which processes should really be written down?
- Appointing operators
- Dealing with abuse from operators
- Regularity of discussion
- Do we want to have IRC meetings like this scheduled regularly regardless of obvious concerns, or a monthly e-mail asking for feedback, or anything like that?
IrcOperatorMeetingAgenda (last edited 2008-08-06 16:29:27 by localhost)