2011-06-21

Meeting Minutes

IRC Log of the meeting.
Meeting minutes.

Agenda

20110621 Meeting Agenda

ARM Status

Kernel development: nothing new to report. Oneiric/ti-omap4: during the last TI call we got to know that _perhaps_ we will get a 3.0 kernel for the O cycle. Still not 100% sure and no ETA yet. Linaro already has a .39 kernel but it doesn't boot on my panda (while it seems it works ok with a linaro hwpack if device tree is disabled). Gcc 4.6 and omap usb: lp#791552 has been confirmed as a kernel upstream bug, thus until we get a proper fix and as long as we us gcc 4.6, we loose usb across all the omap* targets. So far all the proposed workarounds didn't help.

Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs

oneiric nominated bugs

  • 28 linux kernel bugs (up 8)

Ubuntu oneiric-alpha-2 bugs

  • 3 linux kernel bugs (up 3)

oneiric-updates bugs

  • 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

natty-updates bugs

  • 25 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

maverick-updates bugs

  • 3 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

lucid-updates bugs

  • 8 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

hardy-updates bugs

  • 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)

Incoming Bugs

  • 23 oneiric bugs (up 4)
  • 1326 natty bugs (up 14)
  • 1129 maverick bugs (up 2)
  • 1038 lucid bugs (up 1)
  • 38 hardy bugs (no change 0)

Regressions

regression-update bugs

  • 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
  • 4 natty bugs (no change 0)
  • 43 maverick bugs (up 1)
  • 77 lucid bugs (up 2)
  • 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)

regression-release bugs

  • 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
  • 450 natty bugs (down 3)
  • 247 maverick bugs (down 1)
  • 224 lucid bugs (no change 0)
  • 2 hardy bugs (no change 0)

regression-proposed bugs

  • 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
  • 2 natty bugs (no change 0)
  • 2 maverick bugs (no change 0)
  • 0 lucid bugs (no change 0)
  • 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)

Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review

apw, lag, manjo, ralveti, rtg: you have work items to review your set of Ubuntu patches which I've postponed to Alpha-2 for you. Please take a moment to review when you have a chance. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelOneiricUbuntuDeltaReview for your specific set of patches.

Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements

Was able to get some domUs started with Oneiric as dom0. Some strange problem to follow-up on when having xenconsole and console on a serial line. Also need to file a bug to get blkback and netback loaded when the system gets started as dom0. Otherwise there is a strange effect when starting the domUs.

Status: General Oneiric

We uploaded the 3.0-1.2 Ubuntu kernel last week. This was rebased on the upstream v3.0-rc3 release. Alpha-2 is also approaching, ie Thurs June 30. That means we'll likely upload our final Alpha-2 kernel this Friday June 24th. If there are any patches that need to land in Alpha-2, get them sent to the kernel-team mailing list asap.

Status: Stable Kernel Team

Kernel SRU tracking page

Current status

Hardy
  • released

Lucid
  • Verification complete but a regression is suspected
  • Regression bug: http://launchpad.net/bugs/791512

  • Kernel will not be released until this is resolved
  • QA testing is in progress
  • Security Signoff is in progress

Maverick
  • Verification complete
  • Awaiting QA testing or signoff
  • Security Signoff is in progress

Natty

Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy

Current Kernel versions are always available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html

Package

Upd/Sec

Proposed

TiP

Verified

lucid linux-meta-lts-backport-natty

2.6.38.10.20

0

0

--- linux-ec2

2.6.32-316.31

2.6.32-317.34

3

3

--- linux-lts-backport-natty

2.6.38-10.44~lucid1

1

1

--- linux-meta-mvl-dove

2.6.32.216.18

2.6.32.217.19

0

0

--- linux-ports-meta

2.6.32.32.24

2.6.32.33.25

0

0

--- linux-mvl-dove

2.6.32-216.33

2.6.32-217.34

8

8

--- linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick

2.6.35.25.36

2.6.35.30.38

0

0

--- linux-lts-backport-maverick

2.6.35-25.44~lucid1

2.6.35-30.54~lucid1

21

21

--- linux-meta

2.6.32.32.38

2.6.32.33.39

0

0

--- linux-firmware

1.34.7

1.34.10

0

0

--- linux

2.6.32-32.62

2.6.32-33.68

3

3

--- linux-fsl-imx51

2.6.31-608.25

2.6.31-609.26

0

0

--- linux-meta-fsl-imx51

2.6.31.608.9

2.6.31.609.10

0

0

--- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32

2.6.32-32.32

2.6.32-33.33

0

0

--- linux-meta-ec2

2.6.32.316.17

2.6.32.317.18

0

0

maverick linux-ports-meta

2.6.35.28.21

2.6.35.30.23

0

0

--- linux-mvl-dove

2.6.32-416.33

2.6.32-417.34

6

6

--- linux-meta-mvl-dove

2.6.32.416.6

2.6.32.417.7

0

0

--- linux-firmware

1.38.6

1.38.8

1

0

--- linux

2.6.35-28.50

2.6.35-30.54

14

14

--- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35

2.6.35-28.20

2.6.35-30.22

0

0

--- linux-meta

2.6.35.28.36

2.6.35.30.38

0

0

natty linux-meta-ti-omap4

2.6.38.1209.7

0

0

--- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38

2.6.38-10.6

0

0

--- linux-firmware

1.52.1

0

0

--- linux

2.6.38-10.44

15

15

--- linux-ti-omap4

2.6.38-1209.13

10

10

--- linux-meta

2.6.38.10.25

0

0

Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized

ogasawara:

  • bjf, the links you post at the start of the meeting still reference Natty, should be Oneiric
    • Noted and fixed.
  • The bug stats we post each meeting, are those useful to anyone other than myself? Would it suffice to just post the link to the stats?

sconkline:

  • I have the same question about kernel versions in the meeting - is posting th elink just as useful?
    • The elink is more appropriate in that case

KernelTeam/Meeting/2011-06-21 (last edited 2011-06-21 17:52:59 by brad-figg)