2006-01-12
Revision 1 as of 2006-02-01 21:54:14
Clear message
- Use of /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL vs /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 for GPLed apps packages.
(Reference in Policy : http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile )
- TODOs: (sistpoty)
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/libstdc++5-deps.txt - Packages still depending on libstdc++5
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/libstdc++-allocator-change.txt - packages not yet rebuilt for libstc++ allocator change
- UVF (sistpoty)
- extra time for universe?
- how to handle packages on revu?
- What's next todo? (sistpoty)
- unmet dependencies
- bug triage
- packages, that ftbfs (who will run an automated test ? when ?)
- Reorganization of MOTU-related Launchpad teams. See ["MOTU/Meetings/TeamReorg"] (lucas)
- Code of conduct for REVU-uploaders : Currently, a lot of packages are uploaded to Ubuntu through REVU. What will happen to them in a year ? Will the first REVU-uploader still has to take care of them ? We don't want a universe filled with unmaintained packages. + Policy regarding unmaintained and useless packages which are only in Ubuntu. Should we remove them ? What's the procedure ?
- Collaborative maintenance on tiber via svn or other means
- Brainstorming/Ideas how to organize divergence in our universe
add your agenda points here