= Main Inclusion Report for sourcepackage =

== Requirements ==

 0. ''Availability:'' http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/k/kexec-tools; available for all supported architectures or some subset ? Currently ftbfs on ppc. Will fix.
 0. ''Rationale:''
  * Required for crashdump spec
 0. ''Security:''
  * [[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=kexec-tools|entries]]: None
  * [[http://secunia.com/search/?search=kexec-tools|Secunia history]]: None
  * Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ?  Any daemons ? No
  * Network activity: does it open any port ?  Does it handle incoming network data ? No
  * Any source code review performed ? Have done some work with code, seems clean, but does touch kernel memory, so it's pretty scary by nature.
 0. ''Quality assurance:''
  * In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? N/A
  * Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? No
  * [[http://bugs.debian.org/src:kexec-tools|Debian bugs]]: No major bugs
  * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kexec-tools.html|Maintenance in Debian]] calm
  * Upstream: No known upstream. Maintained by distros
  * Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? No
 0. ''Standards compliance:'' 
  * [[http://www.pathname.com/fhs/|FHS]], [[http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/|Debian Policy]] compliance ? Yes
  * [[http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html|Debian library packaging guide]] standards compliance ? Yes
  * Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ?  Patch system ?  Any packaging oddities ? Uses debhelper and dpatch. Nothing odd about the build system.
 0. ''Dependencies:''
  * Build: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, gnu-efi (>=3.0a-4) [ia64]
  * Binary: libc6
  * Are these all in main ? Yes
 0. ''Background information:''
  * The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file.  If it isn't then please explain.
  * What do upstream call this software ?  Has it had different names in the past ? Same name. No other aliases.

== Reviewers ==
MartinPitt: approved