Main Inclusion Report for libdigest-sha-perl

Requirements

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libd/libdigest-sha-perl/; available for all architectures.

2. Rationale:

   • Build dependency of ...
   • spamassassin and libmail-dkim-perl (both spec'ed for Intrepid):
     • ServerAmavisdDKIMSpec

     • ClamavSpamassassinInMain

3. Security:

   • CVE entries: None

   • Secunia history: None

   • Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? No Any daemons ? No
   • Network activity: does it open any port ? No Does it handle incoming network data ? No
   • Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? No
   • Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.) No

4. Quality assurance:

   • In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? None
   • Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? No

   • Debian bugs: None

   • Maintenance in Debian is vigorous.

   • http://search.cpan.org/dist/Digest-SHA/ is somewhat vigorous.

   • http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Digest-SHA: None.

   • Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? No.
   • Is there a test suite in the upstream source or packaging ? Yes. Is it enabled to run in the build ? Yes.

5. Standards compliance:

   • FHS, Debian Policy compliance ? Yes.

   • Debian library packaging guide standards compliance ? Yes.

   • Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? debhelper Patch system ? None Any packaging oddities ? No. Standard Perl module.

6. Dependencies:

   • libdigest-sha-perl
     • Depends: libc6
     • Depends: perl

     • Depends: <perlapi-5.10.0> perl-base

   • Are these all in main ? Yes.

7. Background information:

   • The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain.
   • What do upstream call this software ? Digest::SHA Has it had different names in the past ? No.

Reviewers

MIR bug: 243306

Author: ScottKitterman