MainInclusionReportNut
Main Inclusion Report for sourcepackage
Requirements
Availability: [http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/n/nut]; available for all supported architectures.
Rationale:
Security:
[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=nut CVE entries]: none
[http://secunia.com/search/?search=PRODUCT_NAME Secunia history]: none
- Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? Any daemons ?
- there are 2 daemons and a set of utils. some of them run as root.
- Network activity: does it open any port ? Does it handle incoming network data ?
- Yes. it's a client/server based set of tools.
- Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.)
Quality assurance:
- In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
- Requires manual configuration as the external hw is not always autodetectable.
- Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ?
yes but only if upgrading from versions < 2.2.0 for the core package and < 2.0.1 for the nut-cgi package.
[http://bugs.debian.org/src:nut Debian bugs]: Several bugs at different severities.
[http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nut.html Maintenance in Debian] is very calm
[http://random.networkupstools.org/ Upstream] is active
- Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ?
- Yes. It deals with external UPS'es. Not extremely exotic.
- In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
Standards compliance:
[http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ FHS], [http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Debian Policy].
- Package looks FHS compliant, lintian complains on a bunch of things and the nut-dev package doesn't provide shared libraries (only static).
- Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? Patch system ? Any packaging oddities ?
- dpatch.
Dependencies:
- Are these all in main ?
- Build-deps and Depends are all in main.
- Are these all in main ?
Reviewers
MIR bug: [https://bugs.launchpad.net/182790]
The author of this report should put their name here; reviewers will add comments etc. too