MainInclusionReportVlock
Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2008-01-14 08:40:35
1936
Comment:
|
← Revision 2 as of 2008-08-06 16:19:14 ⇥
1954
converted to 1.6 markup
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
0. ''Availability:'' [http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/vlock]; available for all supported architectures. | 0. ''Availability:'' [[http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/vlock]]; available for all supported architectures. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
* [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=vlock CVE entries]: one entry from 1999. it doesn't affect our version/package. * [http://secunia.com/search/?search=vlock Secunia history]: no entries |
* [[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=vlock|CVE entries]]: one entry from 1999. it doesn't affect our version/package. * [[http://secunia.com/search/?search=vlock|Secunia history]]: no entries |
Line 22: | Line 22: |
* [http://bugs.debian.org/src:vlock Debian bugs]: no showstoppers or relevant bugs. * [http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vlock.html Maintenance in Debian] is calm * [http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~toidinamai/vlock/archive/ Upstream] is calm |
* [[http://bugs.debian.org/src:vlock|Debian bugs]]: no showstoppers or relevant bugs. * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vlock.html|Maintenance in Debian]] is calm * [[http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~toidinamai/vlock/archive/|Upstream]] is calm |
Line 28: | Line 28: |
* [http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ FHS], [http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Debian Policy] | * [[http://www.pathname.com/fhs/|FHS]], [[http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/|Debian Policy]] |
Line 38: | Line 38: |
MIR bug: [https://bugs.launchpad.net/182779] | MIR bug: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/182779]] |
Main Inclusion Report for sourcepackage
Requirements
Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/vlock; available for all supported architectures.
Rationale:
Security:
CVE entries: one entry from 1999. it doesn't affect our version/package.
Secunia history: no entries
- Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? Any daemons ?
- some binaries are setuid to allow normal users to lock the tty's. No daemons.
- Network activity: does it open any port ? Does it handle incoming network data ?
- it's not a net app.
- Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.)
- no.
Quality assurance:
- In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
- none. package works out of the box.
- Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ?
- no.
Debian bugs: no showstoppers or relevant bugs.
Maintenance in Debian is calm
Upstream is calm
- Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ?
- nope
- In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
Standards compliance:
- all good on this front.
- Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? Patch system ? Any packaging oddities ?
- nope
Dependencies:
- Are these all in main ?
- yes
- Are these all in main ?
Reviewers
MIR bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/182779
The author of this report should put their name here; reviewers will add comments etc. too
MainInclusionReportVlock (last edited 2008-08-06 16:19:14 by localhost)