= Main Inclusion Report for sourcepackage =

== Requirements ==

 0. ''Availability:'' [[http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/vlock]]; available for all supported architectures.
 0. ''Rationale:''
  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerPackageReview
 0. ''Security:''
  * [[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=vlock|CVE entries]]: one entry from 1999. it doesn't affect our version/package.
  * [[http://secunia.com/search/?search=vlock|Secunia history]]: no entries
  * Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ?  Any daemons ?
    some binaries are setuid to allow normal users to lock the tty's. No daemons.
  * Network activity: does it open any port ?  Does it handle incoming network data ?
    it's not a net app.
  * Any source code review performed ?  (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.)
    no.
 0. ''Quality assurance:''
  * In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ?
    none. package works out of the box.
  * Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ?
    no.
  * [[http://bugs.debian.org/src:vlock|Debian bugs]]: no showstoppers or relevant bugs.
  * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vlock.html|Maintenance in Debian]] is calm
  * [[http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~toidinamai/vlock/archive/|Upstream]] is calm
  * Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ?
    nope
 0. ''Standards compliance:'' 
  * [[http://www.pathname.com/fhs/|FHS]], [[http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/|Debian Policy]]
    all good on this front.
  * Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ?  Patch system ?  Any packaging oddities ?
    nope
 0. ''Dependencies:''
  * Are these all in main ?
    yes

== Reviewers ==

MIR bug: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/182779]]

''The author of this report should put their name here; reviewers will add comments etc. too''

FabioMassimoDiNitto