= Main Inclusion Report for xsp = == Requirements == 1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xsp/ available for all supported arches 2. Rationale: new build-dependency of monodoc (mono-xsp-base contains dh_installxsp which was in mono-utils before). it is also a runtime dependency for monodoc-http (which is moved to universe). I would propose to have the xsp sourcepackage and the mono-xsp-base binary package in main, everything else in universe. 3. Security: * Recent cross-site scripting vuln (CVE-2005-0509) * Contains a full webserver, opens port, etc. * Relatively young and unaudited code 4. Quality assurance: * The package contains a simple webserver and apache{1,2} mod_mono backends to run ASP.NET programs. * Maintained by the Debian Mono Group http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org * Some outstanding bugs in Debian BTS [[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xsp]]. Most of them are fixed with our version in universe and will be fixed soon in Debian. * Almost no open upstream bugs [[http://bugzilla.ximian.com/buglist.cgi?product=Mono+Tasks&product=Mono%3A+Class+Libraries&product=Mono%3A+Compilers&product=Mono%3A+Debugger&product=Mono%3A+Doctools&product=Mono%3A+Runtime&product=Mono%3A+Tools&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=xsp&short_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=substring&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&op_sys_details=&op_sys_details_type=substring&version_details=&version_details_type=substring&cmdtype=doit&order=%27Importance%27&form_name=query|here]] 5. Standards compliance: * The package meets the FHS, Debian Policy and CLIPolicy 6. Dependencies: * Depends only on main stuff (mono, cli-common) == Reviewers == MartinPitt: I'd rather avoid bringing all of this webserver stuff into main, especially for Dapper. It sounds ok in six months, when the code matured a bit and we only have 18 monts of support. Can the debhelper script be moved back into mono-utils, or can mono-xsp-base get its own source package with only safe stuff?