Diff for "MeetingLogs/Security/20110411"

20110411

Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)

Review of any previous action items
- Comodo aftermath should be done (excepting chromium-browser?)
Weekly stand-up report (each member discusses any pending and planned future work for the week)
- jdstrand
  - Weekly role: happy place
  - short week last week
  - kde updates
  - bisect two natty bugs, follow-up on various other bugs
    - jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!)
  - archive admin for Beta-2
  - performance reviews
  - usn microsite
- kees
  - Weekly role: happy place
  - last week: Unity, patch pilot
  - catch-up on state of kernel hardening
  - beta-2 and QRT
  - pending updates
- mdeslaur
  - Weekly role: community
  - pending updates
- sbeattie
  - Weekly role: triage
  - last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa
  - pending updates
- micahg
  - Weekly role: happy place
  - chromuium regression
  - pending updates
Miscellaneous and Questions
- hardy desktop eol May 12th
- performance reviews are entered into the system
- UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add
- apparmor in Debian
  - enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine
  - Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace
- usn microsite

MeetingLogs/Security/20110411 (last edited 2011-04-11 18:46:50 by pool-71-114-233-7)

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2011-04-11 16:58:08 → 
  Size: 1306
  Editor: pool-71-114-233-7
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2011-04-11 18:44:11 → ⇥
  Size: 2093
  Editor: pool-71-114-233-7
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
-== Meeting (DRAFT) ==
+== Meeting ==
 Line 28:
+    * jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!)
-Line 30:
+Line 31:
+   * usn microsite
-Line 32:
+Line 34:
+   * last week: Unity, patch pilot
   * catch-up on state of kernel hardening
   * beta-2 and QRT
   * pending updates
-Line 37:
+Line 43:
+   * last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa
   * pending updates
-Line 39:
+Line 47:
+   * chromuium regression
-Line 41:
+Line 50:
+  * hardy desktop eol May 12th
-Line 42:
+Line 52:
-  * UDS topics
+  * UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add
-Line 44:
+Line 54:
+   * enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine
   * Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace