20110411

Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2011-04-11 18:44:11
Size: 2093
Editor: pool-71-114-233-7
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2011-04-11 18:46:50
Size: 2444
Editor: pool-71-114-233-7
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 47: Line 47:
   * chromuium regression    * chromium regression: password database can't be accessed after upgrade. Upstream hasn't moved on it at all. May fix in the future at which point will have 2 password databases that are out of sync. Poor user experience and support provided by upstream. Will issue update anyway.
    * [ACTION] micahg to coordinate practicality of NEWS file with fta and adjust changelog

Meeting

Attendance

  • kees
  • mdeslaur
  • sbeattie
  • micahg
  • jjohansen
  • jdstrand

Not present

  • None

Agenda

  • Review of any previous action items
    • Comodo aftermath should be done (excepting chromium-browser?)
  • Weekly stand-up report (each member discusses any pending and planned future work for the week)
    • jdstrand
      • Weekly role: happy place
      • short week last week
      • kde updates
      • bisect two natty bugs, follow-up on various other bugs
        • jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!)
      • archive admin for Beta-2
      • performance reviews
      • usn microsite
    • kees
      • Weekly role: happy place
      • last week: Unity, patch pilot
      • catch-up on state of kernel hardening
      • beta-2 and QRT
      • pending updates
    • mdeslaur
      • Weekly role: community
      • pending updates
    • sbeattie
      • Weekly role: triage
      • last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa

      • pending updates
    • micahg
      • Weekly role: happy place
      • chromium regression: password database can't be accessed after upgrade. Upstream hasn't moved on it at all. May fix in the future at which point will have 2 password databases that are out of sync. Poor user experience and support provided by upstream. Will issue update anyway.
        • [ACTION] micahg to coordinate practicality of NEWS file with fta and adjust changelog
      • pending updates
  • Miscellaneous and Questions
    • hardy desktop eol May 12th
    • performance reviews are entered into the system
    • UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add
    • apparmor in Debian
      • enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine
      • Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace

    • usn microsite

Log

Logs available at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/

MeetingLogs/Security/20110411 (last edited 2011-04-11 18:46:50 by pool-71-114-233-7)