MenusRevisited
Differences between revisions 1 and 2
|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2005-09-12 06:17:21
Size: 1263
Comment: initial braindump
|
Size: 1258
Comment: s/radically altered/good review
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 19: | Line 19: |
| The Gnome menu system has not been radically altered in quite some time. There is some issues that need to be addressed. | The Gnome menu system has not had a good review in quite some time. There is some issues that need to be addressed. |
Created: CoreyBurger
Priority: NeedsPriority
People: NeedsLead, NeedsSecond
Contributors: CoreyBurger2
- Interested:
Status: UbzSpecification, BrainDump (then DraftSpecification then EditedSpecification then ApprovedSpecification), DistroSpecification
- Branch:
- Malone bug:
- Packages affected:
- Depends:
- Dependents:
- BoF sessions: none yet
Summary
The Gnome menu system has not had a good review in quite some time. There is some issues that need to be addressed.
Rationale
The Current menu structure is less than ideal in certain places.
Use cases
- Sally uses Ubuntu because here step-son installed it for her. She is confused by System Tools and System menus. She doesn't understand the seperation
Scope
The Gnome menu structure
Design
Implementation
Migrate the items out of Applications-->System Tools. Some of them can die, others to Accesories, others to System-->Admin.
Code
Data preservation and migration
None
Outstanding issues
We should probably coordinate with upstream (Gnome) during their 2.14 cycle.
BoF agenda and discussion
MenusRevisited (last edited 2008-08-06 16:25:19 by localhost)