Downstream
Differences between revisions 2 and 3
|
Size: 339
Comment:
|
Size: 546
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| = Upstream = | = Downstream = |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| The greatest strength of open source is the ability for every one to improve and modify their software as they see fit. Ubuntu can benefit greatly from this by developing a healthy ecosystem of downstream distributions which contribute back to our codebase. | The greatest strength of open source is the ability for every one to improve and modify their software as they see fit. Ubuntu can benefit greatly from this by developing a healthy ecosystem of downstream distributions which contribute back to our code base. |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| CategoryMozillaTeam | The overall quality of the Ubuntu code base can be improved by receiving good issue reports from downstream. The biggest challenges are going to be == Patches == Both Ubuntu and downstream [CategoryMozillaTeam] |
[draft proposal]
Downstream
The greatest strength of open source is the ability for every one to improve and modify their software as they see fit. Ubuntu can benefit greatly from this by developing a healthy ecosystem of downstream distributions which contribute back to our code base.
Bug Triage
The overall quality of the Ubuntu code base can be improved by receiving good issue reports from downstream. The biggest challenges are going to be
Patches
Both Ubuntu and downstream
MozillaTeam/Downstream (last edited 2008-08-06 17:00:59 by localhost)