MultiarchSpec

[Show "Revision History"] [Show "General Page Infos"] [Show "Page hits and edits"]

Revision History

Showing page edit history entries from 1 to 74 out of 74 entries total. (5 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 items per page)

# Date Size Editor Comment Action
74 2014-12-22 16:29:21 30531 to previous wookey   view
73 2014-10-11 23:35:18 30462 to previous vorlon the default value is Multi-Arch: no, not Multi-Arch: none view
72 2013-10-20 20:02:16 30464 to previous vorlon revert unsolicited changes. view
71 2013-10-20 12:05:27 30308 to previous jdthood   view
70 2013-10-20 12:01:15 30259 to previous jdthood   view
69 2013-10-20 11:19:26 29744 to previous jdthood   view
68 2013-10-20 11:12:52 29611 to previous jdthood   view
67 2013-10-19 17:44:42 29770 to previous vorlon you don't need to be copy-editing the explanatory text on a two-year-old spec. view
66 2013-10-19 17:38:21 29863 to previous jdthood   view
65 2012-12-13 08:20:21 29770 to previous jrnieder http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/multiarch-devel/2012-December/000052.html view
64 2012-07-23 15:16:06 29369 to previous wookey   view
63 2012-07-02 21:18:44 29333 to previous vorlon the original is correct, this is an either/or not both. view
62 2012-07-02 20:51:56 29334 to previous shawnlandden if you are talking about going the whole way, it would take kernel support, or out-of-band with nfs root, qemu-user will NOT work for init view
61 2011-12-16 00:04:53 29333 to previous vorlon Revert previous change, because "the dependency" is incorrect language, and there isn't actually any antecedent ambiguity. If the language can be clarified without making it inaccurate, fixes welcome view
60 2011-12-15 06:37:15 29345 to previous scottritchie Fix an ambiguous "it" in Dependencies involving Architecture: all packages view
59 2011-03-15 01:01:18 29333 to previous becquer   view
58 2011-03-15 00:48:39 29333 to previous becquer indent the explanations of each possible value of the field, so it's easier to tell what goes with what. view
57 2011-02-22 07:22:04 29319 to previous becquer   view
56 2011-02-13 04:34:52 29126 to previous becquer   view
55 2011-02-10 06:16:42 29125 to previous becquer clarify that Multi-Arch: foreign/allowed *are* allowed for Architecture: all packages view
54 2010-10-22 13:26:01 29118 to previous 18712615764   view
53 2010-10-14 18:33:44 29114 to previous robbie.w   view
52 2010-09-29 18:31:07 29101 to previous robbie.w   view
51 2010-09-02 16:17:54 29101 to previous sjr Add unresolved issue "binNMU" view
50 2010-07-07 15:18:23 28635 to previous c-24-6-241-216 update speclink view
49 2010-05-31 19:00:46 28639 to previous 77 remove myself from contributors. view
48 2010-02-21 14:22:28 28651 to previous adambbutler two small typos corrected (trivial) view
47 2010-02-01 18:59:18 28650 to previous unassigned please don't insert proposals into the text of the spec; they should be discussed first view
46 2010-02-01 16:56:37 29227 to previous goswin-v-b Propose Multi-Arch: native for kernel and package managers view
45 2010-01-19 22:27:50 28650 to previous goswin-v-b   view
44 2009-12-09 18:45:58 28665 to previous minbar what? no - revert invalid markup change view
43 2009-12-09 18:36:55 28672 to previous dhcp-eduroam-8   view
42 2009-11-30 02:20:17 28665 to previous robbie.w   view
41 2009-07-25 15:13:35 28666 to previous 194 document that arch: all packages have to match the native arch view
40 2009-07-25 13:58:31 28165 to previous 194 change apt to pull Packages for all supported archs by default, per mvo/tollef view
39 2009-07-25 13:40:08 28479 to previous 194 restore Wookey's edits, clobbered in previous commit view
38 2009-07-25 13:38:02 28454 to previous 194 revise the handling of interpreters to eliminate the need for flag days view
37 2009-07-25 12:11:14 29042 to previous wookey Clarify the bit that I read 12 times and still didn't understand. view
36 2009-07-24 20:40:15 29017 to previous 194 change arch-qualified dependency syntax to use : instead of [], for future consistency with cross-arch Build-Depends view
35 2009-07-11 20:59:46 28776 to previous minbar wording improvements from Tollef on the semantics of Multi-Arch view
34 2009-07-08 14:23:25 28836 to previous 82-69-40-219 minor typos and such view
33 2009-07-01 04:11:33 28826 to previous minbar another ${self}:any -> ${self}:other view
32 2009-07-01 04:08:13 28824 to previous minbar   view
31 2009-07-01 03:34:51 28478 to previous minbar ${self}:any -> ${self}:other view
30 2009-06-16 18:34:23 28476 to previous minbar use space-separated arch list in sources.list, consistent with control file syntax; thanks, Guillem view
29 2009-06-15 23:35:58 28476 to previous minbar apt sources.list view
28 2009-06-09 19:50:18 27094 to previous minbar the other categories of migration work shouldn't apply view
27 2009-06-09 19:24:03 27181 to previous minbar clarify that Multi-Arch: foreign *prohibits* co-installability view
26 2009-06-09 19:04:27 27137 to previous minbar exact wording; thanks, mpt! view
25 2009-06-09 18:21:35 27068 to previous minbar migration concerns from ia32-libs view
24 2009-06-09 08:25:36 26412 to previous minbar more user stories view
23 2009-06-09 05:37:45 25691 to previous minbar fill in other sections: summary, release note view
22 2009-06-08 05:21:57 25948 to previous minbar additional comments on biarch packages view
21 2009-06-08 04:46:27 25705 to previous minbar   view
20 2009-06-08 04:24:01 23777 to previous minbar typo view
19 2009-06-08 04:23:16 23776 to previous minbar   view
18 2009-06-08 04:20:53 23530 to previous minbar   view
17 2009-06-08 04:17:49 23522 to previous minbar another round of documenting the UDS outcomes view
16 2009-06-07 23:47:16 18967 to previous minbar identify designs that were rejected in the UDS session, and flesh out the chosen implementation for arch-independent file handling view
15 2009-06-07 22:14:06 16940 to previous minbar unresolved issues view
14 2009-06-07 21:42:37 14623 to previous minbar a round of incorporating results from UDS view
13 2009-06-07 06:04:14 11700 to previous minbar pull in some corrections from the UDS session view
12 2009-06-07 05:00:09 11392 to previous minbar   view
11 2009-06-07 04:50:13 11409 to previous minbar correct i386 paths (really i486 - will this change again for karmic?) view
10 2009-06-03 02:17:39 11409 to previous minbar field value change from 'yes' to 'same' view
9 2009-06-01 12:01:31 11404 to previous minbar   view
8 2009-05-29 08:40:28 11369 to previous 80 proposals for arch-indep handling view
7 2009-05-29 07:41:13 9343 to previous 80 initramfs should not require changes for multiarch. view
6 2009-05-29 07:39:47 9369 to previous 80   view
5 2009-05-25 15:32:37 9336 to previous 217 added some more packages depending on multiarch view
4 2009-05-22 09:53:29 9282 to previous gw   view
3 2009-05-19 13:47:54 9198 to previous 212   view
2 2009-05-19 13:43:25 9197 to previous 212   view
1 2009-05-19 13:42:55 9183 212   view