Comments

Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2009-02-21 15:50:47
Size: 1916
Editor: dunc
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2009-02-21 15:52:47
Size: 1916
Editor: dunc
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
I also, generally agree with ScottKitterman about community maintainence issues. - DuncanLock Also, I generally agree with ScottKitterman about community maintainence issues. - DuncanLock

Your comments on NotifyOSD are welcome here. Please sign your name with each comment. Thanks!


I think listing any Kubuntu applications here is premature. There is no buy in at all from the Kubuntu community that these changes are desired - ScottKitterman

I think if Canonical Dx is going to modify Universe/Multiverse packages then they ought to commit to maintain them and not pitch the changes over the fence to the community - ScottKitterman

I find that notifications which warrant acknowledgements - e.g. wireless or battery state changes - appearing as bubbles at the edge of the screen is a much nicer experience (less disruptive) than alert boxes. I think notifications that relate to a panel notification area icon appearing next to the related icon is an excellent feature. For notifications that contain a non-trivial amount of text, I like that they remain visible until dismissed by clicking. I like that I can manually dismiss a notification if the system's idea of how long it should remain is different to what I want. In short, I disagree with large chunks of the rationale. I think there should be an easy way to revert back to notification-daemon on a per-user basis. (Note: not stracciatella, only the notification facility) - maxb

Having read through the docs covering the NotifyOSD changes, I have to say I'm pretty lukewarm about it, as are a lot of others in the community, I think. From a users perspective, it seems like the end result will be an increase in the number of modal popup dialog boxes in addition to notification popups which now refuse to follow your chosen theme. I wouldn't consider this to be progress, on the whole. Having said that, the persistence (logging) and queueing stuff sound like a steps forward, although they probably won't show up until 9.10. Also, I generally agree with ScottKitterman about community maintainence issues. - DuncanLock

NotifyOSD/Comments (last edited 2012-08-08 22:03:18 by saintdanbert)