OptRequirement
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2012-04-11 10:14:28
1296
Comment:
|
1480
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
<<TableOfContents>> |
|
Line 9: | Line 11: |
= Exceptions = Exceptions to the /opt requirement need approval by the TB on a case by case basis. Currently unity extensions and .desktop file are allowed. |
Contents
This page discusses the current state of the /opt requirement for apps.
Background
Apps which go to the AppReviewBoard, currently have the requirement to install files into /opt.
Rationale
Avoiding conflicts: Installing files into a separate location on the file system helps to avoid file conflicts.
(Future) confinement: In the future this would allow us to more easily confine apps.(?)
Exceptions
Exceptions to the /opt requirement need approval by the TB on a case by case basis. Currently unity extensions and .desktop file are allowed.
Problems
- Our toolkits, checking tools and frameworks are stream-lined to install files into /usr, not into /opt.
- General documentation on the internet is all about /usr.
- If you want to get your app into Ubuntu, you have to either special-case where you look for files or maintain separate versions of your code.
Solutions
- Conflicts could be easily avoided if we check package contents against:
- $release Contents*.gz files (for stable releases that's even easier)
- Contents*.gz files for backports, archive.canonical.com and extras
- One caveat would be diversions and alternatives, but they could be checked with a logic like in command-not-found.
Confinement is a problem not solved by the /opt requirement, but with initiatives like SecurityTeam/Specifications/Precise/AppArmorEasyprof be considered in the future.
OptRequirement (last edited 2012-04-30 20:54:43 by static-50-53-5-218)