UBTCriteria
Criteria for how to define quality output from a person in a given Focus Group.
Forums
[#] of example posts that showed skilled resolution for dealing with questions from new users. Also examples of how the [CANDIDATE] was able to refine the original question down to what the 'real' issue was so a solution could be offered. In addition [#] of FAQ/How-To posts that show a quality product that allow new users to tackle the problem covered with ease.
Wiki
[#] of wiki pages that show the [CANDIDATE] has produced clear and concise documentation, cleaned up out-of-date documentation or added information that further clarifies the subject.
Resources
Doc Team mentoring
join the team/organization
Launchpad Answers
[#] of LP Answers the person has completed successfully and professionally.
Bug Hunting
[#] of LP bugs both reported and triaged.
Read How to Triage
Join Bug Squad
The main element here is the quality of the responses given to the new bug, and a good understanding of the process and workflow that a bug goes through. This includes moving bugs upstream, and an understanding of the upstream workflow.
Resources
Getting Involved
Contains information on getting started with bug triage.
bug squad mentorship
Team created to help manage bug Squad mentorship program.
Security
[#] of forum posts in the security forums area that show the [CANDIDATE] understands both Linux specific and general security issues. In addition [#] of FAQ/How-To posts on the forums or wiki documents regarding security specific issues.
Development
Present a medium sized project that covers the dev requirements.
** In all cases Correct facts are critical, and quality is more critical then count.