Status

Differences between revisions 29 and 136 (spanning 107 versions)
Revision 29 as of 2011-11-23 13:32:06
Size: 1785
Editor: 82-69-40-219
Comment:
Revision 136 as of 2020-09-11 10:13:19
Size: 3697
Editor: rbalint
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
== Daily build status == == Proposed Migration ==
Line 5: Line 5:
This is a scratchpad for known showstopper issues in current Ubuntu desktop and server daily builds. This doesn't mean problems we would refuse to release Ubuntu with; this means problems that prevent anyone using the daily builds and which force the +1 maintenance team and/or the developer responsible for the breakage to make fixing this their number one task. This will amount to something like:  * https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
Line 7: Line 7:
 * build fails
 * principal metapackages (ubuntu-minimal, ubuntu-standard, ubuntu-desktop) uninstallable
 * automated tests can't run (and not a test bug)
 * can't get to a desktop or run the server
 * https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
Line 12: Line 9:
|| '''Date''' || '''Status''' ||
|| 2011-11-23 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-22 || Colin was on holiday and didn't check, but apparently OK ||
|| 2011-11-21 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-20 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-19 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-18 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-17 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-16 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-15 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
|| 2011-11-14 ||<#00FF00> No known showstoppers ||
 * Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/
Line 24: Line 11:
== Other ==  * Last test rebuild (may be out of date): https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200327-focal-focal.html
Line 26: Line 13:
Other things the +1 maintenance team is working on or tracking. Please don't add things to this list unless you're on the team. == Known issues ==
Line 28: Line 15:
 * sshfs uninstallable, breaking ltsp-client (correct fix is to merge fuse; cjwatson part-way through this)
 * ia32-libs on amd64 uninstallable, blocking wine1.3 and dssi-vst for ubuntustudio. Seems a germinate problem with traversing multiarch dependency chains
 * The Perl 5.14 transition is still in progress, although 97% complete and should block very few upgrades at this point.
== In progress ==

Items that are being actively worked on. Please always mention the name / irc nick, who is working on that.

 * [rbalint] Switch Britney hints to git [[https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-bzr-to-git/+merge/386139|review]]

== Things to pick from ==

These are issues that are not yet done, after somebody's rotation/shift ended.
Or someone has spotted them but had no chance to work on it.
If someone trying to pick them realized that it was resolved by time/someone-else please be so kind and remove the related entries.

 * Ongoing transitions
  * there are plenty of rust packages stuck in -proposed. Unfortunately the rust packages we sync from Debian are not generally in a consistent state allowing migration (to Debian testing or to the Ubuntu release). If someone takes a look at these, they will probably want to recommend removals of various leaf packages blocking transitions.
  * vcmi ftbfs, pinged xnox about it, boost 1.71 related
    * bug number please? I see just an FTBFS on riscv64.
  * rust-* some test and many "unsatisfiable depends", one needs to check how this was meant to work ...
    * the rust packages only build if uploaded in a very precise order, which they were to debian but the debian import freeze messes this up for us
    * it's not clear that any of these packages help users of Ubuntu at all, so putting effort into these packages has a low ROI IMO (I == mwhudson)
  * there is a mess of go packages that needs unpicking. It's the sort of thing where we/Debian has updated one package to a given version, but some of the rdeps upstream are still pinning an older version.
  * autopkgtest for r-cran-* is in excuses quite often, this needs to be checked and probably custom test triggers (there also is a whopping 1.8k r-cran-* tests in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running atm)
  * perl micro update 5.30.3 - On Monday there was another upload of 5.30.3-4 and someone overzealously removed all perl tests. Cpaelzer/xnox/Laney re-triggered the tests the results ahve to be re-checked.


 * Not ready yet
  * haskell-* seems like mass-FTBFS and build-dependency need
    * [cpaelzer] (snip remove old details ...) Per coordination with Debian several things need to be resolved first [[https://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2020/06/msg00003.html|their ML as reply]].
      * The above was early ~June, many but not all things are resolved by now (early August)
    * haskell-haskell-gi-base was downgraded for now which makes many haskell things show up as wait-on-dep
      * unblocking these would conflict with ICU, do not touch them yet
      * after ICU is done syncpackage 0.23 of haskell-haskell-gi-base to get many haskell builds and tests
        going again
    * On Aug 11th then:
     [18:53] <vorlon> cpaelzer: fyi after yesterday's conversation (and britney nagging me about a number of
     packages that I "uploaded" being stuck in -proposed too long ;), I am going ahead and rolling forward the
     various haskell packages that had been rolled back, after confirming they're not entangled with any current
     transitions. (e.g. the haskell-gi-* stuff can't be since it was all removed from release pocket)

+1 Maintenance Status

Proposed Migration

Known issues

In progress

Items that are being actively worked on. Please always mention the name / irc nick, who is working on that.

  • [rbalint] Switch Britney hints to git review

Things to pick from

These are issues that are not yet done, after somebody's rotation/shift ended. Or someone has spotted them but had no chance to work on it. If someone trying to pick them realized that it was resolved by time/someone-else please be so kind and remove the related entries.

  • Ongoing transitions
    • there are plenty of rust packages stuck in -proposed. Unfortunately the rust packages we sync from Debian are not generally in a consistent state allowing migration (to Debian testing or to the Ubuntu release). If someone takes a look at these, they will probably want to recommend removals of various leaf packages blocking transitions.
    • vcmi ftbfs, pinged xnox about it, boost 1.71 related
      • bug number please? I see just an FTBFS on riscv64.
    • rust-* some test and many "unsatisfiable depends", one needs to check how this was meant to work ...
      • the rust packages only build if uploaded in a very precise order, which they were to debian but the debian import freeze messes this up for us
      • it's not clear that any of these packages help users of Ubuntu at all, so putting effort into these packages has a low ROI IMO (I == mwhudson)
    • there is a mess of go packages that needs unpicking. It's the sort of thing where we/Debian has updated one package to a given version, but some of the rdeps upstream are still pinning an older version.
    • autopkgtest for r-cran-* is in excuses quite often, this needs to be checked and probably custom test triggers (there also is a whopping 1.8k r-cran-* tests in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running atm)

    • perl micro update 5.30.3 - On Monday there was another upload of 5.30.3-4 and someone overzealously removed all perl tests. Cpaelzer/xnox/Laney re-triggered the tests the results ahve to be re-checked.
  • Not ready yet
    • haskell-* seems like mass-FTBFS and build-dependency need
      • [cpaelzer] (snip remove old details ...) Per coordination with Debian several things need to be resolved first their ML as reply.

        • The above was early ~June, many but not all things are resolved by now (early August)
      • haskell-haskell-gi-base was downgraded for now which makes many haskell things show up as wait-on-dep
        • unblocking these would conflict with ICU, do not touch them yet
        • after ICU is done syncpackage 0.23 of haskell-haskell-gi-base to get many haskell builds and tests
          • going again
      • On Aug 11th then:
        • [18:53] <vorlon> cpaelzer: fyi after yesterday's conversation (and britney nagging me about a number of packages that I "uploaded" being stuck in -proposed too long ;), I am going ahead and rolling forward the various haskell packages that had been rolled back, after confirming they're not entangled with any current transitions. (e.g. the haskell-gi-* stuff can't be since it was all removed from release pocket)

PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status (last edited 2020-10-21 18:41:40 by rbalint)