Unity8

Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2014-01-22 21:04:08
Size: 2120
Editor: pool-173-74-228-115
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2014-01-22 21:24:11
Size: 919
Editor: pool-173-74-228-115
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
 * Is your branch in sync with latest trunk (e.g. bzr pull lp:trunk -> no changes)
 * Did you build your software in a clean sbuild/pbuilder chroot or ppa?
 * Did you build your software in a clean sbuild/pbuilder armhf chroot or ppa?
 * Has your component "TestPlan” been executed successfully on emulator, N4?
 * Has a 5 minute exploratory testing run been executed on N4?
 * If you changed the packaging (debian), did you subscribe a core-dev to this MP?
 * If you changed the UI, did you subscribe the design-reviewers to this MP?
 * What components might get impacted by your changes?
 * Have you requested review by the teams of these owning components?
}}}
 * Answers to checklist questions are desired to be 'yes' but if 'no' or 'not applicable' please expound
 * First please copy & paste into the MP the checklist found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common
 * Did you break mir server API or ABI and have the relevant bumps to .so and debian docs been made ?
 * Did you break mir client API or ABI and have you followed up with the known clients & announced on mir-devel mailing list ?
 }}}
Line 19: Line 14:
{{{
Note: Please ensure you include the following form filled out and submitted along side your code to the MP ticket.
Note: A Reviewer usually is responsible for a single component; since we ask for reviewers to be subscribed that might see an impact by this MP this mean that we get one-to-many reviewers contributing to the MP review process.

Below the checklist that a reviewer should follow taking the viewpoint of his component, which might or might not be the same as the component this MP is targeted against.

 * Are any changes against your component pending/needed to land the MP under review in a functional state and are those called out explicitly by the submitter?
 * Did you do exploratory testing related to the component you own with the MP changeset included?
 * Has the submitter requested review by all the relevant teams/reviewres?
 * If you are the reviewer owning the component the MP is against, have you checked that submitter has accurately filled out the submitter checklist and has taken no shortcut?
}}}
Simply refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common
Line 32: Line 17:
 * ensure that the checklists have been properly filled out by submitter and all reviewers Simply refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common

MP Submission Checklist Template

Note: Please ensure you include the following form filled out and submitted along side your code to the MP ticket.

 * Answers to checklist questions are desired to be 'yes' but if 'no' or 'not applicable' please expound
 * First please copy & paste into the MP the checklist found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common
 * Did you break mir server API or ABI and have the relevant bumps to .so and debian docs been made ?
 * Did you break mir client API or ABI and have you followed up with the known clients & announced on mir-devel mailing list ?

MP Review Checklist Template

Simply refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common

MP Landing Checklist Template

Simply refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/Common

Process/Merges/Checklists/Unity8 (last edited 2017-03-28 21:55:58 by saviq)