Summary

Summary

  • Bug Importance Guidelines
    • Brian Murray (bdmurray) is sending an e-mail to the ubuntu-devel mailing list requesting a discussion about setting bug Importance on a per-package basis instead of on a per-distribution basis.
  • Iso Testing Bug report layout. While testing UME cgregan came up with a nice bug report template to write out reports. I am attempting to do the same thing for Iso testing. I think the polished our reports are the more the dev's will look to them. (As the QATeam I also feel we should lead the way hear too). Here is a Layout I've tried for the first time comments please. - davmor2

  • Bugs in backport packages. Which should the policy with those be? It is clearly written that those packages are unsupported. -- AraPulido

    • Backport packages are community supported.
    • The policy is to open a task against the backports project and then close any Ubuntu task once it's verified to only be in -backports.
  • QA Liaison to Launchpad (LaserJock)

  • FAUMachine for installation testing (LaserJock)

    • FAUMachine was brought up as a potentially useful tool for automated testing.
  • Items not on Agenda
    • A suggestion was made to improve inter-team linking (particularly on the wiki) between QA Team, BugSquad and Testing.

QATeam/Meetings/20080730/Summary (last edited 2008-08-06 16:29:33 by localhost)