TheStages

Differences between revisions 7 and 9 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2012-09-04 20:23:19
Size: 7360
Editor: host-89-241-248-40
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2012-09-04 21:09:24
Size: 6700
Editor: host-89-241-248-40
Comment: new page
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was copied from QATeam/Overview
Line 6: Line 7:
This section provides further information and useful links for testers. As with all alphas and betas they are not suitable for a production environment, please take the time to read [[http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1594833 | Common Questions for Testing]]
Line 8: Line 8:
== Announcements == = Stages of the Ubuntu Release Schedule =
As new features are added at the beginning of the cycle, Quality assurance and the testers check for bugs and test for correct function.
== Daily Builds ==
Line 10: Line 12:
At each milestone release, the notes at [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview | technical overview]] are updated. The daily images between milestone releases are tested on a cadence (in the case of quantal, every 2 weeks) by the ubuntu QA community.
Line 12: Line 14:
== Bugs == The most important goal with these images is simply to find as many bugs as possible and report them with enough detail that they can be fixed. Finding the bugs ahead of the milestone crunch is helpful as it gives us more time to fix them. Of course finding and reporting bugs in the released milestones is also useful for improving the overall quality of the distribution.
Line 14: Line 16:
It is especially important that Bugs found in the development release be [[Bugs/Upstream|upstreamed]] so that their upstream authors can see them. Often we are using the latest, unmodified alpha code for various projects during the development release, so the odds of it being fixed are much greater if they can be reported to the upstream developers making the changes. As there is less time pressure on testing these images than the pre-release ones, we would encourage more in-depth testing on a range of hardware to flush out the deeper hidden bugs. If possible, please perform installs using a variety of methods and focus on the quality and depth of testing as opposed to the quantity.
Line 16: Line 18:
=== Reporting Bugs ===
Discussing a bug on IRC, email, forum or facebook areas etc. does not raise a bug. The devs do not monitor those areas. By all means use them to discuss a problem. Once your discussion about the bug is at a stage where you can report it, then for it to be actioned by the devs you '''must''' [[https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | raise a bug]].
The Dailies are automatically generated every 24 hours, the get suspended as the QA cycles kick in.
Line 19: Line 20:
=== My Bug went Private === == Pre-Alpha ==
Line 21: Line 22:
The bot that goes looking for duplicated bugs is not aware if the bug it is using as master is private. If this happens please go to #ubuntu-bugs and raise it with them. Scary, expect them to break! At this point in the cycle the devolopers (devs) are pushing the boundaries to the absolute limit to what they would ''like'' to be in the next release. Testing is always important during this time, so that the devs have some feed back as to how things are going. The use of [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing/TheStages#Virtual_Machines | Virtual Machines]] is handy at this point.
Line 23: Line 24:
== Alpha's ==
Line 24: Line 26:
=== Dealing with Bug Reports ===
Triaging (dealing) with bug reports is a really important area. When new fixes come through it is important to let people know. [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Old_untouched_bugs | please try a newer version]] is one such answer. There is also [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses | full list of responses]]. It is important that the person who raised the bug, no matter if it is incomplete, a duplicate or any other reason is made to feel that their bug is important. Simply put, to them, it is the most important bug in the world and should be treated as such.
With the launch of the alpha's, we are into the area of 'it should not break too often'. The pre Alpha testing is to ensure that they boot. With a bootable Alpha 1 out, the devs then go to try adding things to it and updating things to the latest versions available for things. Things may well get broken. With the test version of the Alpha 2, things are little less concentrated on getting 'new' stuff in, but checking what is fixable.
Line 27: Line 28:
=== The Bug Squad ===
If you'd like to know more about the treatment of bugs, please head over to [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/KnowledgeBase | The Bug Squad]] new comers are always welcome.
The purpose of the Alpha milestones is to encourage wider public testing of the image builds. Before we can recommend the images for public testing we must at least ensure that they have all built correctly (are not in themselves corrupt) and are at least known to boot on some machines. Some form of installation should also be tested. We do not require that these images be tested for any possible minor defect or that all possible install methods work, since that is rather the goal of the wider image testing itself. Find the show stopper bugs and get them fixed.
Line 30: Line 30:
When an important error is found, the current frozen images are rejected and new ones are built after the fix has been applied. It is therefore important to make sure that you are testing the most recent images.
Line 31: Line 32:
== Testing ==
Testing is split into distinct, but joined areas. The '''Daily Builds''', the '''Cadence Testing''', the '''QA-testing of Milestone releases''' and the '''Milestone releases''' themselves.
If the bug is specific to one flavour, only those will be re-built and the other flavour builds remain valid. So if we find a serious bug in the Ubuntu version we will rebuild those images, which will take several hours in total. Likewise, if we find a bug that exists across all flavors, but only on i386, we will re-build i386 and all amd64 and PPC images remain valid.
Line 34: Line 34:
To not get overly complicated, think of it as that we have a [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule | schedule]] to keep to. A few days before a Milestone is due, the daily is plucked and becomes the QA (Quality Assurance) test version for the Milestone release. Once it is confirmed that the QA version works, it then becomes the [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing#Milestone_Releases | Milestone]]. == Beta and Final Release Candidates ==
Line 36: Line 36:
All release stages are tracked by [[http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ | ISO Tracker]] where you can get the latest builds, see and allocate any [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/ReportingBugs | Bugs]]. The first glimpse of what the final release may well look like. With the Betas, we mainly switch from testing on [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing/TheStages#Virtual_Machines | Virtual Machines]] to 'Real Computers'. No changes to what applications that will be shipped from this point should be altered without a very good reason. The first Beta is for people to widely check on as many computers as possible to check if certain types of computer and their associated internal parts are having problems. The second Beta is the prelude for the final version, things are now concentrated on bug-fixing.
Line 38: Line 38:
So, in order of how they happen. For Beta and Final milestones we have extended testing periods where we try to find as many bugs as we can. With the Beta we want to put our best foot forward across the distribution and want to fix as many bugs as we have the manpower for, large or small. For the Final release on the other hand, we will only fix the remaining release critical bugs. This is because seemingly small changes can have unintended consequences and break other things. Minor changes that are merely a good idea to fix will be deferred to downloadable updates.
Line 40: Line 40:
=== Daily Builds === The procedure of rejecting known bad images and continuing testing of unaffected ones also applies here as with the Alphas.
Line 42: Line 42:
These iso's are automatically generated every 24 hours using the latest updates on the system from the devs. They are available from [[http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/|ISO tracker]]. Using the [[https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ZsyncCdImage | zsync (or rsync)]] option allows you to update your [[https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BurningIsoHowto |iso]] to any of the various dailies you choose to follow without having to re-download the entire iso. They are there to check that bugs that are resolved between the Milestone releases do not break the install. They also are used to confirm that any fix for a bug that seriously affects an initial install which is released for testing now works. == Final Release ==
Line 44: Line 44:
=== Cadence Testing ===
As a new way to test the builds, we host cadence testing weeks every two weeks, possibly in the middle of a milestone, for example in between Alpha 2 and Alpha 3. These run on the Daily Builds system as above.
And that, is how we test & do things. If you fancy a roller-coaster ride then do get on. You will have the ability when the Release is made, to smile to yourself and to others. And to say "'''I was a part of that'''".
Line 47: Line 46:
=== QA testing of Milestone releases === === Thank-you ===
Line 49: Line 48:
Alpha, Beta and Release Candidates (RC) are also tested using [[http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/|ISO tracker]]. If you want to help out in this important area of testing, please read through [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Procedures | Procedures]] for further details. These appear a couple of days before the actual Milestone release so that we can check they are okay to become Milestone releases. So, you have got this far? Thank-you! We were all once new to the family that is Ubuntu and felt worthless because we had so many questions, yet felt we could never answer them for others. In testing the [[https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa | Lubuntu-QA team]] welcomes you. You are a new tester, you have hundreds of questions running through your mind. There is no such thing as a dumb question, if they are not answered on our [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing | QA page]], please just ask!
We have the full backing & support from the [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/ | 'main' QA team]] for Ubuntu. We will, as testers, answer any S.O.S. request from any of our family, just as those family members will assist Lubuntu. For further information on the QA / Testing team in general, head over to [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/ | Ubuntu QA]]. We are a family, we cannot stress how important you people are. Please do feel free to ask questions, you are very important - you can help make the instructions better.
Line 51: Line 51:
'''QA testing is to ensure the actual install iso works, if you can, please get involved in the qa testing''' == Virtual Machines ==
Line 53: Line 53:
=== Milestone Releases === As some testing is carried out on Virtiual Machines (VMs), a quick note on them. Like testing, it can seem very complicated, there are some excellent resources available at [[https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualMachines | virtual machines]] (Easy to install). If you'd like to learn more about the subject of Virtual Machines, there is further informtion at [[http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/serverguide/C/virtualization.html | Ubuntu KVM]].
Line 55: Line 55:
Once a Milestone release passes the QA testing, it becomes a Milestone Release and is listed on the [[http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/ | Releases]] as such.

If you would to know more about how this all works, have a read of [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing/TheStages | Stages of testing]].

=== Calls for Testing ===
Occasionally, we will have unscheduled testing events to test a specific product or feature. Tests for these and instructions will vary, however the qatracker will be utilized if possible to help manage and record the testing.

== General Testing ==
During the release cycle, things will get broken. You can really reduce these occurrences by taking the time to read [[http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1479146|Partial Upgrades]].

=== Known Issues ===
All the known issues for a particular release are mentioned in the Announcement email, and are available to see at [[http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ | ISO Tracker]].

=== Manual test of ISO and CD ===
On the help-pages of Ubuntu there is an extensive guide on [[https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM|how to MD5SUM]].

== Specific Testing ==

=== QA tests ===
You can do more specific tests, like ones done for the Ubuntu ISO : http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/5090

=== Laptop Testing ===

Laptops never cease to have their little 'quirks'. You can help on this important area by heading over to [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Laptop/Procedures | Laptop Testing]] for full details.


=== Performance tests ===
You can test some aspects of Ubuntu performance with the following programs :
 * [[http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/ | gtkperf]] : Test the performance of the gtk theme.
 * [[http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ | phoronix-test-suite ]]: General benchmarks and test suite.
 * [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BootCharting | bootchart]] : Test boot process.

=== Unwanted packages ===
Some packages can be automatically installed, but are not wanted on a default installation. To find the package which automatically installed the package that you don't want :
 * Install apt-rdepends
 * run "apt-rdepends -r --show=Depends the_unwanted_package" => It will show which packages depend on the_unwanted_package.
 * run "apt-rdepends -r --show=Recommends the_unwanted_package" => It will show which packages recommend the_package_unwanted (Recommended packages are installed by default).
 * You may have to run the commands several times to see the complete chain of depends / recommends.
 * Advantage: If it dies, you can restart / re-install it easily without affecting your 'main' machine.
 * Dis-advantage: A VM does not fully check out your own computers' hardware setup.

More Information

Stages of the Ubuntu Release Schedule

As new features are added at the beginning of the cycle, Quality assurance and the testers check for bugs and test for correct function.

Daily Builds

The daily images between milestone releases are tested on a cadence (in the case of quantal, every 2 weeks) by the ubuntu QA community.

The most important goal with these images is simply to find as many bugs as possible and report them with enough detail that they can be fixed. Finding the bugs ahead of the milestone crunch is helpful as it gives us more time to fix them. Of course finding and reporting bugs in the released milestones is also useful for improving the overall quality of the distribution.

As there is less time pressure on testing these images than the pre-release ones, we would encourage more in-depth testing on a range of hardware to flush out the deeper hidden bugs. If possible, please perform installs using a variety of methods and focus on the quality and depth of testing as opposed to the quantity.

The Dailies are automatically generated every 24 hours, the get suspended as the QA cycles kick in.

Pre-Alpha

Scary, expect them to break! At this point in the cycle the devolopers (devs) are pushing the boundaries to the absolute limit to what they would like to be in the next release. Testing is always important during this time, so that the devs have some feed back as to how things are going. The use of Virtual Machines is handy at this point.

Alpha's

With the launch of the alpha's, we are into the area of 'it should not break too often'. The pre Alpha testing is to ensure that they boot. With a bootable Alpha 1 out, the devs then go to try adding things to it and updating things to the latest versions available for things. Things may well get broken. With the test version of the Alpha 2, things are little less concentrated on getting 'new' stuff in, but checking what is fixable.

The purpose of the Alpha milestones is to encourage wider public testing of the image builds. Before we can recommend the images for public testing we must at least ensure that they have all built correctly (are not in themselves corrupt) and are at least known to boot on some machines. Some form of installation should also be tested. We do not require that these images be tested for any possible minor defect or that all possible install methods work, since that is rather the goal of the wider image testing itself. Find the show stopper bugs and get them fixed.

When an important error is found, the current frozen images are rejected and new ones are built after the fix has been applied. It is therefore important to make sure that you are testing the most recent images.

If the bug is specific to one flavour, only those will be re-built and the other flavour builds remain valid. So if we find a serious bug in the Ubuntu version we will rebuild those images, which will take several hours in total. Likewise, if we find a bug that exists across all flavors, but only on i386, we will re-build i386 and all amd64 and PPC images remain valid.

Beta and Final Release Candidates

The first glimpse of what the final release may well look like. With the Betas, we mainly switch from testing on Virtual Machines to 'Real Computers'. No changes to what applications that will be shipped from this point should be altered without a very good reason. The first Beta is for people to widely check on as many computers as possible to check if certain types of computer and their associated internal parts are having problems. The second Beta is the prelude for the final version, things are now concentrated on bug-fixing.

For Beta and Final milestones we have extended testing periods where we try to find as many bugs as we can. With the Beta we want to put our best foot forward across the distribution and want to fix as many bugs as we have the manpower for, large or small. For the Final release on the other hand, we will only fix the remaining release critical bugs. This is because seemingly small changes can have unintended consequences and break other things. Minor changes that are merely a good idea to fix will be deferred to downloadable updates.

The procedure of rejecting known bad images and continuing testing of unaffected ones also applies here as with the Alphas.

Final Release

And that, is how we test & do things. If you fancy a roller-coaster ride then do get on. You will have the ability when the Release is made, to smile to yourself and to others. And to say "I was a part of that".

Thank-you

So, you have got this far? Thank-you! We were all once new to the family that is Ubuntu and felt worthless because we had so many questions, yet felt we could never answer them for others. In testing the Lubuntu-QA team welcomes you. You are a new tester, you have hundreds of questions running through your mind. There is no such thing as a dumb question, if they are not answered on our QA page, please just ask! We have the full backing & support from the 'main' QA team for Ubuntu. We will, as testers, answer any S.O.S. request from any of our family, just as those family members will assist Lubuntu. For further information on the QA / Testing team in general, head over to Ubuntu QA. We are a family, we cannot stress how important you people are. Please do feel free to ask questions, you are very important - you can help make the instructions better.

Virtual Machines

As some testing is carried out on Virtiual Machines (VMs), a quick note on them. Like testing, it can seem very complicated, there are some excellent resources available at virtual machines (Easy to install). If you'd like to learn more about the subject of Virtual Machines, there is further informtion at Ubuntu KVM.

  • Advantage: If it dies, you can restart / re-install it easily without affecting your 'main' machine.
  • Dis-advantage: A VM does not fully check out your own computers' hardware setup.

QATeam/Overview/TheStages (last edited 2015-01-23 16:17:15 by xdsl-83-150-81-40)