ReplacementInitDiscussion
|
Size: 874
Comment: added new spec
|
Size: 1380
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| * Interested:ScottJamesRemnant | * Interested: ScottJamesRemnant, MartinMeredith |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| * Branch: | * Branch: UbuntuTrack |
| Line 32: | Line 32: |
| You may wish to talk with Mandriva people about "[http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2005-10/msg00256.php prcsys/pinit]". It is not as powerful as initng, however, it is not such agdgressive change and it may even go into Dapper and definitely into Dapper+1. '''Look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit.''' Why not work with Red Hat on a new init system? They have the same goals as we do. -- PeterVanderKlippe [[DateTime(2006-04-19T17:27:47Z)]] |
Created: Date(2005-10-06T18:49:39Z) by JaneWeideman
Priority: NeedsPriority
People: NeedsLead, NeedsSecond
Contributors: JaneWeideman, ScottJamesRemnant
Interested: ScottJamesRemnant, MartinMeredith
Status: UbzSpecification, BrainDump (then DraftSpecification then EditedSpecification then ApprovedSpecification), DistroSpecification
Branch: UbuntuTrack
- Malone bug:
- Packages affected:
- Depends:
- Dependents:
- BoF sessions: none yet
Summary
Discuss replacing the tried, trusted and terrible sysvinit with something a little more flashy such as initng or launchd.
Rationale
Use cases
Scope
Design
Implementation
Code
You may wish to talk with Mandriva people about "[http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2005-10/msg00256.php prcsys/pinit]". It is not as powerful as initng, however, it is not such agdgressive change and it may even go into Dapper and definitely into Dapper+1.
Look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit. Why not work with Red Hat on a new init system? They have the same goals as we do.
Data preservation and migration
Outstanding issues
BoF agenda and discussion
ReplacementInitDiscussion (last edited 2010-05-24 13:24:51 by nat7)