CoreDevApplication

Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2010-05-17 06:39:50
Size: 2720
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2010-05-17 17:56:23
Size: 3642
Editor: ANancy-258-1-117-253
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 39: Line 39:
== Sebastien Bacher ==
=== General feedback ===
Robert Ancell has joined the Ubuntu Desktop Team a year ago and has became one of the key members there. He has been showing strong technical skills as well on packaging than on upstream hacking, did a great amount of GNOME updates during the karmic and lucid cycle, worked with the Ubuntu community, Debian and upstream when appropriate and helped improving the way the desktopteam is working. I recommend him strongly there!

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
I've been sponsoring lot of GNOME updates from Robert over the two previous cycles and working with him in the desktop team for a year now, he has been mostly been taking good decisions, doing good work and moving things forward in an efficient way.

=== Areas of Improvement ===

Robert, you should really have applied for upload rights earlier, would have spare us some sponsoring ;-)

I, Robert Ancell, apply for core-dev status.

Name

Robert Ancell

Launchpad Page

https://launchpad.net/~robert-ancell

Wiki Page

RobertAncell

Who I am

I'm Robert Ancell and work for Canonical as a GNOME Desktop Engineer on the Ubuntu Platform team. I am an upstream GNOME developer (gcalctool, GNOME Games).

My Ubuntu story

I've been using Ubuntu since 4.10 when I was thinking "how have I never heard of this project that is at version 4 already?". Before that it was Debian, Mandrake and Red Hat Linux.

My involvement

  • Long time Ubuntu user and bug reporter
  • Upstream developer

Examples of my work / Things I'm proud of

Areas of work

I have worked as a member of the Desktop team for the last year updating GNOME packages and fixing bugs. I also continue to make gcalctool releases and fix bugs in GNOME.

Things I could do better

Filling out Ubuntu paperwork earlier (e.g. Core Dev applications)

Plans for the future

General

I'd like to see the core Ubuntu applications improve in usability and consistency. Being able to work continuously on Ubuntu allows me to push the small patches upstream to help the upstream projects achieve this. I'd also like to help to improve the platform development documentation so real-world programmers can work out how to easily use all the APIs.

What I like least in Ubuntu

The Preferences/Administration tools. They have multiplied over the years and while there seems to be regular effort each cycle to tidy them they don't seem to be getting any better.


Comments

If you'd like to comment, but are not the applicant or a sponsor, do it here. Don't forget to sign with @SIG@.


Endorsements

As a sponsor, just copy the template below, fill it out and add it to this section.

Sebastien Bacher

General feedback

Robert Ancell has joined the Ubuntu Desktop Team a year ago and has became one of the key members there. He has been showing strong technical skills as well on packaging than on upstream hacking, did a great amount of GNOME updates during the karmic and lucid cycle, worked with the Ubuntu community, Debian and upstream when appropriate and helped improving the way the desktopteam is working. I recommend him strongly there!

Specific Experiences of working together

I've been sponsoring lot of GNOME updates from Robert over the two previous cycles and working with him in the desktop team for a year now, he has been mostly been taking good decisions, doing good work and moving things forward in an efficient way.

Areas of Improvement

Robert, you should really have applied for upload rights earlier, would have spare us some sponsoring Wink ;-)


TEMPLATE

== <SPONSORS NAME> ==
=== General feedback ===
## Please fill us in on your shared experience. (How many packages did you sponsor? How would you judge the quality? How would you describe the improvements? Do you trust the applicant?)

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
''Please add good examples of your work together, but also cases that could have handled better.''
=== Areas of Improvement ===


CategoryCoreDevApplication

RobertAncell/CoreDevApplication (last edited 2010-05-26 02:13:29 by CPE-124-189-84-179)