UNRKarmicSeeds

Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2009-05-26 10:24:39
Size: 2731
Editor: 80
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2009-05-26 10:29:23
Size: 2835
Editor: 80
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 62: Line 62:
 * If we do split then we can create another seed gtk desktop commomn
only makes sense if we create mobile
 * loic - splitting things out
 *OGR models are different we won't have acces to different packges (Main, ) Becauce meta pkgs
 * If we do split then we can create another seed gtk desktop common. This only makes sense if we create mobile seed.
 * loic - Why do we want to split things out?
 * Steve,Emmit - Nice to have and ????
 *OGR models are different we won't have access to different packages (Main,.... )
 *
Because of meta pkgs
Line 70: Line 71:
do we use ubuntu live, or our own live - mobile
 * Open Question -D
o we use ubuntu live, or our own live - mobile???
  • Launchpad Entry: unr-karmic-seeds

  • Created:

  • Contributors: Steve Kowalik

  • Packages affected: mobile-meta, ubuntu-meta

Summary

Currently seeds for UNR are their own seed pod with the MID seed. This specification is to discuss if we should move the UNR seed out, and if so, where to.

Release Note

Not needed, no user-visible changes.

Rationale

User stories

Assumptions

Design

You can have subsections that better describe specific parts of the issue.

Implementation

This section should describe a plan of action (the "how") to implement the changes discussed. Could include subsections like:

UI Changes

Should cover changes required to the UI, or specific UI that is required to implement this

Code Changes

Code changes should include an overview of what needs to change, and in some cases even the specific details.

Migration

Include:

  • data migration, if any
  • redirects from old URLs to new ones, if any
  • how users will be pointed to the new way of doing things, if necessary.

Test/Demo Plan

It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during testing, and to show off after release. Please add an entry to http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Coverage/NewFeatures for tracking test coverage.

This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.

Unresolved issues

This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.

BoF agenda and discussion

  • what a seed is? Discussed to bring everyone up to speed
  • proposal to break out a new branch
  • UNR seeds - other issues How do you test these seeds - there is no user interface to it, it is a plumbing change.
  • The concern is about structure
  • This is a nice to have - naming, MID specific , more people have access
  • If we do split then we can create another seed gtk desktop common. This only makes sense if we create mobile seed.
  • loic - Why do we want to split things out?
  • Steve,Emmit - Nice to have and ????
  • OGR models are different we won't have access to different packages (Main,.... )
  • Because of meta pkgs
  • Rookery will explode
  • 30 pkgs need to included, Check with robbie agree on moving to ubuntu
  • find out next step after checking with Robbie
  • Open Question -Do we use ubuntu live, or our own live - mobile???


CategorySpec

Specs/UNRKarmicSeeds (last edited 2009-06-11 07:05:45 by 14)