DeveloperApplication

Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2010-08-25 19:50:17
Size: 4840
Editor: ip-64-32-163-20
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2010-08-25 20:08:35
Size: 6506
Editor: ip-64-32-163-20
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 39: Line 39:
''Let us know what you worked on, with which development teams / developers you cooperated and how it worked out.''
## As a per-package uploader, please give us some insight into the package maintenance and bug situation since you're working on it.
I perform many test builds of Ubuntu kernels, and testing of proposed fixes.

The Stable kernel team also has responsibility for kernel security patches, working with the Ubuntu security team, and I expect to work on these in the future.

I have been working in my free time to help package the d-rats application for Debian, and view this as an opportunity to pursue becoming a Debian Developer. I have also had extensive discussions with the upstream developers of an application named cqrlog to help them make changes in order to be able to package that application for Debian (and Ubuntu).
Line 44: Line 47:
I could do a better job of communicating what I'm doing to the community in general. A lot of things I work on are interesting, but I seldom take the time to blog about them or to use other social media to talk about what I'm doing.
Line 45: Line 50:
Line 46: Line 52:

I'd like to continue to increase my responsibilities as a member of the kernel team, as I gain experience in more of the many aspects of release management.

I plan to continue to be active in my community activities, especially with the Amateur Radio community.

I plan to complete the Debian packaging of the applications I have started on, and to become a Debian Developer. I have a Debian Sponsor and Advocate, and will continue to contribute.
Line 47: Line 60:
''Please describe what you like least in Ubuntu and what thoughts do you have about fixing it.''
I think that in general, participants in Ubuntu have not done a very good job of articulating the tremendous contributions that Ubuntu is making to open source. The discussion of these contributions has been framed in terms of upstream contributions, number of patches, etc. I think that the contributions which really set Ubuntu apart are mind share, advocacy, ubiquity, ease of use, and a perceptual shift of "Linux" from a vague, geeky concept in the minds of the general public to something associated with value, utility, and general usefulness. I'm proud to be helping to get GNU/Linux into the hands of so many people who have never used it before. I wish we did did a better job of communicating that value.

I, Steve Conklin, apply for upload rights for the linux-* packages.

Name

Steve Conklin

Launchpad Page

https://launchpad.net/~sconklin

Wiki Page

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SteveConklin

Who I am

I have over ten years experience in open source software, and much longer experience in software and hardware engineering. I am a linux kernel engineer employed by Canonical, and work on the stable updates team. I contribute to several open source amateur radio applications through code contributions, testing, packaging, and advocacy. They include hamlib, fldigi, d-rats, and cwtext.

Past employment includes 9.5 years with Red Hat, where I maintained the userspace security packages and numerous userspace amateur radio applications for both Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora. Prior to that, I have 20+ years of software and hardware engineering experience.

My Ubuntu story

My involvement

I first got involved as a user of Ubuntu shortly after leaving employment with Red Hat. When a job opening appeared on the Canonical kernel team, I applied and was hired. Since then I have had various roles on the team, helping to enable new hardware for PC OEMs, helping evaluate and test graphics drivers during the Lucid cycle, and I am now helping perform stable maintenance on all supported released of the Ubuntu kernel.

I founded the Ubuntu-hams and https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-hams-devel teams, which have become dynamic, growing teams with an active irc community.

I have participated in conferences and advocated for Ubuntu and Canonical, attending Southeast Linux Fest, Linux Collaborative Summit, Linux Plumber's conference, and Libre Graphics Forum.

I have worked with upstream developers to have their applications packaged for Debian, so that they may be available in Ubuntu.

Examples of my work / Things I'm proud of

Areas of work

I have helped enable new hardware (prior to release by manufacturers) to operate well on Ubuntu Linux. I did this in cooperation with the OEM group at Canonical, and working with upstream developers, in particular the graphics driver developers.

I performed a lot of evaluation and testing that supported the decision to release Ubuntu 10.04 with a hybrid kernel that combined the 2.6.32 kernel with the drm stack from 2.6.33. This work was done in cooperation with the entire kernel team, but mostly with Andy Whitcroft, Tim Gardner, and Leann Ogasawara

I have been working on the kernel stable maintenance team, with Stefan Bader (the Ubuntu stable kernel manager) and Brad Figg. We have been coordinating stable updates to the kernel which come from Greg Kroah-Hartman's upstream stable tree, along with other bug fixes. I currently have commit rights for the Ubuntu kernel repositories, and regularly push commits to those.

In the last few months, I have begun performing the packaging for Ubuntu kernel stable releases and have been making sponsored uploads, after having my packages signed by Stefan Bader. I have prepared and uploaded kernel releases for Hardy, Jaunty, Karmic, and Lucid.

I perform many test builds of Ubuntu kernels, and testing of proposed fixes.

The Stable kernel team also has responsibility for kernel security patches, working with the Ubuntu security team, and I expect to work on these in the future.

I have been working in my free time to help package the d-rats application for Debian, and view this as an opportunity to pursue becoming a Debian Developer. I have also had extensive discussions with the upstream developers of an application named cqrlog to help them make changes in order to be able to package that application for Debian (and Ubuntu).

Things I could do better

I could do a better job of communicating what I'm doing to the community in general. A lot of things I work on are interesting, but I seldom take the time to blog about them or to use other social media to talk about what I'm doing.

Plans for the future

General

I'd like to continue to increase my responsibilities as a member of the kernel team, as I gain experience in more of the many aspects of release management.

I plan to continue to be active in my community activities, especially with the Amateur Radio community.

I plan to complete the Debian packaging of the applications I have started on, and to become a Debian Developer. I have a Debian Sponsor and Advocate, and will continue to contribute.

What I like least in Ubuntu

I think that in general, participants in Ubuntu have not done a very good job of articulating the tremendous contributions that Ubuntu is making to open source. The discussion of these contributions has been framed in terms of upstream contributions, number of patches, etc. I think that the contributions which really set Ubuntu apart are mind share, advocacy, ubiquity, ease of use, and a perceptual shift of "Linux" from a vague, geeky concept in the minds of the general public to something associated with value, utility, and general usefulness. I'm proud to be helping to get GNU/Linux into the hands of so many people who have never used it before. I wish we did did a better job of communicating that value.


Comments

If you'd like to comment, but are not the applicant or a sponsor, do it here. Don't forget to sign with @SIG@.


Endorsements

As a sponsor, just copy the template below, fill it out and add it to this section.


TEMPLATE

== <SPONSORS NAME> ==
=== General feedback ===
## Please fill us in on your shared experience. (How many packages did you sponsor? How would you judge the quality? How would you describe the improvements? Do you trust the applicant?)

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
''Please add good examples of your work together, but also cases that could have handled better.''
=== Areas of Improvement ===


SteveConklin/DeveloperApplication (last edited 2010-09-08 17:58:19 by pool-98-108-155-157)