FAQ

Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2007-03-14 12:54:23
Size: 1432
Editor: cF5A6BF51
Comment: created
Revision 2 as of 2007-03-14 20:44:26
Size: 1481
Editor: cF5A6BF51
Comment: 3 m's again
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from Testing/Commmunity/FAQ

Why only 2 ISO images with 3 tests each?

  • In the final rounds of testing it is vital that the scheduled tests are guaranteed to get done. By focusing our efforts on two ISO images we can be sure that these will get good coverage. This in turn means less devel team time needs to be consumed by it. If we see good coverage and good testing on these 2 ISOs during beta, we may expand the scope for RC and Final.

What does 'Primary' and 'Secondary' mean?

  • Each tester should have a single test case as their primary focus. make sure they make an effort to test it thuroughly and in a reasonably short timeframe. A range of other test cases can of course be performed afterwards if there is time. This is another way of ensuring we get reliable coverage on certain tests

Why is Edubuntu not listed?

  • The short answer is: see question one, we need to focus our effort for a reliable result. In earlier forum testing more people volunteered for Ubuntu and Kubuntu. Xubuntu is tested by a separate team, and we may see that for Edubuntu as well.

Why only i386?

  • Again, question #1. Most people who signed up for testing in the forums reported having i386, some amd64 and very little PPC. Those with amd64v hardware can also test i386, so we will focus on that first to get a critical mass. We can extend it to other architectures later. (btw, if you have sparc hardware, please get in touch)

Testing/ISO/FAQ (last edited 2012-01-31 11:05:17 by 202-90-247-27)