Multimedia
Differences between revisions 2 and 3
707
Comment: Formatting changes
|
1236
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 17: | Line 17: |
== Session Name == | == Optimize JPEG Decoding == |
Line 19: | Line 19: |
* Outcome * Outcome * Outcome |
1. Agreed Major Usescases for JPEG Decoder: Browser (many small images), Image Gallery (Large Images) 2. Selection of Software JPEG Decoder for optimization: IJG's Libjpeg 3. JPEG Interface to be exposed: libJPEG (& OpenMAX possibly) 4. Combining H/W & S/W Decoder: Decided to do it with simple GLUE layer over libJPEG. 5. Runtime Selection of SoC specific execution path: Agreed to have only compile time support. 6. ARM+NEON Optimizations Ideas: Agreed no support for SMP needed, Agreed no support for ARM11 and other chips are needed. |
This page is here to collect together proceedings from sessions as part of the 'Multimedia' track at the Natty UDS in Orlando, Florida.
Please add proceedings by doing the following:
- Add a new section with the name of the session.
- Add the outcomes of the session as a collection of bullet points. The goal of the proceedings is to really focus on decided outcomes, so please try to keep them crisp.
Thanks!
Proceedings
Optimize JPEG Decoding
- Agreed Major Usescases for JPEG Decoder: Browser (many small images), Image Gallery (Large Images)
- Selection of Software JPEG Decoder for optimization: IJG's Libjpeg
JPEG Interface to be exposed: libJPEG (& OpenMAX possibly)
Combining H/W & S/W Decoder: Decided to do it with simple GLUE layer over libJPEG.
- Runtime Selection of SoC specific execution path: Agreed to have only compile time support.
- ARM+NEON Optimizations Ideas: Agreed no support for SMP needed, Agreed no support for ARM11 and other chips are needed.
Session Name
- Outcome
- Outcome
- Outcome
Session Name
- Outcome
- Outcome
- Outcome
UDSProceedings/N/Multimedia (last edited 2010-11-18 19:48:46 by 187-35-200-9)