NonProductRequirements
quality
Make the difference in quality between 12.10 and 12.04 at least as great as the difference between 12.04 and 11.10.
Testing
automatated
- continued boot time metrics (pgraner)
- can we add power draw tests? (pgraner)
- deeper, broader smoke tests (pgraner)
extend per commit testing to at least one more upstream (LibreOffice)? (pgraner, jasoncwarner)
manual
- more rigorous community driven test cases and bug reporting (jono)
- more rigorous "calls for testing" (jono)
- proper attribution of bugs found via proper testing so that they are easier to find and fix (jono)
maintenance
12.10 archive
- more rigorously scheduled +1 maintenance (all)
- having the right packages in the right parts of the archive in a way that allows Canonical to focus properly (slangasek)
12.04
- rigorous kernel and other SRUs (pgraner, slangasek)
release
- reduced image set (skaet)
- tighter change control in images, especially around releases (skaet)
Development
- bug agents so teams don't have to monitor bug lists (rickspencer3)
- bug work flow (again) (slangasek)
- easier autobuild, etc... (???)
- using proposed for building and testing (skaet, slangasek)
- trying -updates to permit continued development during release weeks (skaet, slangasek)
- better use of blueprints to capture intent and test plans (skaet)
- revisit how we support flavors and other community projects, can we have more impact with our current investment? (skaet)
- tweeks or revisits to acceptance criteria? (jasoncwarner)
UbuntuEngineering/12.10/NonProductRequirements (last edited 2012-04-04 18:09:38 by AToulouse-554-1-71-18)