ExportsSchedule

Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2009-11-10 07:35:56
Size: 2741
Editor: 212
Comment: First version
Revision 2 as of 2009-11-10 07:47:03
Size: 2741
Editor: 212
Comment: First version
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 29: Line 29:
From the u-t-c mailing list discussion, everyone seems to agree to drop Intrepid, so I believe we can do it straight away. I personally am not too sure about dropping Hardy, but I'd be fine with it if we define and document a clear procedure to request language pack updates. -- [[LaunchpadHome:dpm]] <<DateTime(2009-11-10T08:35:56+0100)>> From the u-t-c mailing list discussion, everyone seems to agree to drop Intrepid, so I believe we can do it straight away. I personally am not too sure about dropping Hardy, but I'd be fine with it if we define and document a clear procedure to request language pack updates. -- [[LaunchpadHome:dpm]] <<DateTime(2009-11-10T08:47:03+0100)>>
Line 43: Line 43:
We should probably discuss all this at UDS, but please, add your comments here. I'd still leave the Jaunty PPAs as they are, but perhaps reducing the frequency of uploads to monthly. In any case, we should update the text on the [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa|PPA page]] to reflect the current situation, since the current text is misleading. -- [[LaunchpadHome:dpm]] <<DateTime(2009-11-10T08:35:56+0100)>> We should probably discuss all this at UDS, but please, add your comments here. I'd still leave the Jaunty PPAs as they are, but perhaps reducing the frequency of uploads to monthly. In any case, we should update the text on the [[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa|PPA page]] to reflect the current situation, since the current text is misleading. -- [[LaunchpadHome:dpm]] <<DateTime(2009-11-10T08:47:03+0100)>>

Introduction

The purpose of this page is to help on the planning of language pack exports and updates

Exports schedule

Discussion

From the u-t-c mailing list discussion, everyone seems to agree to drop Intrepid, so I believe we can do it straight away. I personally am not too sure about dropping Hardy, but I'd be fine with it if we define and document a clear procedure to request language pack updates. -- dpm 2009-11-10 07:47:03

Language packs

  • Automatic PPA uploads
    • Do we still want weekly PPA uploads for Jaunty, or once per month? Or stop them and generate them on request?
    • Karmic PPAs seem to be disabled
  • Language pack updates
    • What do we do for Jaunty? It will probably depend on what we decide for the PPAs. Do we want montly updates?
    • We should define a schedule for Karmic. Proposal: monthly updates, 2 weeks after the PPA upload being tested. E.g. announce a 16th Nov PPA for testing and release the first language pack on the 30th Nov.

Discussion

We should probably discuss all this at UDS, but please, add your comments here. I'd still leave the Jaunty PPAs as they are, but perhaps reducing the frequency of uploads to monthly. In any case, we should update the text on the PPA page to reflect the current situation, since the current text is misleading. -- dpm 2009-11-10 07:47:03


CategoryTranslations

UbuntuTranslationsCoordinators/OngoingProjects/ExportsSchedule (last edited 2010-02-15 13:22:03 by 88)