EucalyptusInMainSpec
6845
Comment:
|
10375
Spring should use already-in-main stuff
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
* '''Created''': * '''Contributors''': * '''Packages affected''': |
* '''Created''': June 2nd, 2009 * '''Contributors''': ThierryCarrez * '''Packages affected''': lots |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
This should provide an overview of the issue/functionality/change proposed here. Focus here on what will actually be DONE, summarising that so that other people don't have to read the whole spec. See also CategorySpec for examples. | Eucalyptus, as part of the Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, needs to move to main to be properly supported by Canonical. That means that all runtime and build-time dependencies (and all dependencies of the dependencies) must also move to main. This specification tracks which packages will need to move to main and efforts made to reduce the total number as much as possible. |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
This section should include a paragraph describing the end-user impact of this change. It is meant to be included in the release notes of the first release in which it is implemented. (Not all of these will actually be included in the release notes, at the release manager's discretion; but writing them is a useful exercise.) It is mandatory. |
Eucalyptus is now part of the Ubuntu "main" repository, and fully supported by Canonical. |
Line 20: | Line 18: |
This should cover the _why_: why is this change being proposed, what justifies it, where we see this justified. | Eucalyptus is currently in universe, together with most of its Java library dependencies. Since Eucalyptus is part of the Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud product, it needs to be properly supported by Canonical, which means move to the "main" repository. However, packages in "main" also need to have all their runtime and build-time dependencies in "main" as well. Java software in general heavily makes use of other Java libraries, so this quickly snowballs into a large number of packages to move to main. Furthermore, there isn't so much Java-based software in main already (OpenOffice.org, tomcat6) so even some basic Java libraries need to be moved. |
Line 24: | Line 22: |
* Dave has been trying the UEC technology preview in 9.04 and aims to deploy UEC with the 9.10 release. As it will no longer be a technology preview, it needs to be properly supported. |
|
Line 25: | Line 25: |
We need to try to keep the number of packages as small as possible in order to avoid MIR team overload. Some hacks (like duplicating some greedy source packages to avoid bringing lots of unnecessary build dependencies) are worth the trouble if they save a significant amount of packages. However Debian doesn't care about keeping the number of dependency packages small, so those hacks don't really make sense from a Debian perspective. |
|
Line 33: | Line 35: |
* Removed dependency from libclassworlds-java -> maven-ant-helper: saves 8+ packages * xmlbeans is no longer needed (Axis2 build dep) so removed libxmlbeans-java libsaxonb-java |
* Remove dependency from libclassworlds-java -> maven-ant-helper: saves 8+ packages * xmlbeans is no longer needed (Axis2 build dep) so removed libxmlbeans-java libsaxonb-java from list * Add arch-based recommend in antlr3 + build as "any": removed antlr3-gcj from list * Add arch-based recommend in libbcprov-java + build as "any": removed libbcprov-java-gcj from list |
Line 40: | Line 44: |
|| antlr3-gcj || antlr3 (rec) || || | |
Line 45: | Line 48: |
|| jruby1.0 || || ej || | |
Line 47: | Line 49: |
|| libaopalliance-java || || ej || | |
Line 55: | Line 56: |
|| libbcprov-java-gcj || libbcprov-java (rec) || || | |
Line 59: | Line 59: |
|| libcommons-attributes-java || || ej || | |
Line 72: | Line 71: |
|| libjamon-java || || ej || | |
Line 111: | Line 109: |
=== Extra dependencies from Debian's Spring packaging === TODO: split between old ej build-deps and spring things jruby1.0, aopalliance libasm3 commons-attribute, jamon... are spring ej build-deps |
=== Dependencies from Spring === ==== Core dependencies ==== ||<rowbgcolor="#cccccc"> '''Package''' || '''Dependency of''' || '''Extra build dep of''' || || jruby1.1 || || Spring || || libcommons-attributes-java || || Spring || || libaopalliance-java || || Spring || || libjamon-java || || Spring || ==== Extra dependencies coming from Debian packaging ==== Note: we would patch so that it uses: * libtomcat6-java instead on libtomcat5.5-java (avoiding libcommons-[el,launcher,modeler]-java) * tomcat6-examples instead of glassfish-appserv |
Line 123: | Line 131: |
|| glassfish-appserv || Spring || || | |
Line 125: | Line 132: |
|| libtomcat5.5-java || Spring || || || libjdom0-java || libfreemarker-java, velocity || || libwerken.xpath-java || velocity || || libcommons-digester-java || libstruts1.2-java, libcommons-validator-java, libcommons-modeler-java || || libcommons-validator-java || libstruts1.2-java || || libcommons-el-java || libtomcat5.5-java || || libcommons-launcher-java || libtomcat5.5-java || || libcommons-modeler-java || libtomcat5.5-java || |
|| libtiles-java || Spring || || || libquartz-java || Spring || || || libxapool-java || Spring || || || libvelocity-tools-java || Spring || || || testng || Spring/test || || || libjdom0-java || libfreemarker-java, velocity || || || libwerken.xpath-java || velocity || || || libcommons-digester-java || libstruts1.2-java, libcommons-validator-java, libcommons-modeler-java, libtiles-java || || || libcommons-validator-java || libstruts1.2-java || || || libcommons-beanutils-java || libtiles-java || || |
Line 136: | Line 145: |
* 60 from primary list | * 54 from primary list |
Line 138: | Line 147: |
* 15 from Debian's Spring '''Total: 83 packages to MIR''' |
* 20 from Refactor/Spring '''Total: 82 packages to MIR''' |
Line 145: | Line 154: |
* Reimplement/fix debian Spring, get rid of 15 packages | * Do a minimal Spring rather than take Debian spring, get rid of (at most) 16 packages |
Line 149: | Line 158: |
tbd | |
Line 152: | Line 162: |
It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during testing, and to show off after release. Please add an entry to http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Coverage/NewFeatures for tracking test coverage. This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta. |
''It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during testing, and to show off after release. Please add an entry to http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Coverage/NewFeatures for tracking test coverage. This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.'' |
Line 158: | Line 168: |
This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved. | ''This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.'' |
Line 162: | Line 172: |
Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected. | === UDS discussion === ==== Current status ==== * 99 packages which would need to move to main. * Java in main is currently driven by OpenOffice. Tomcat6 is there, but has few dependencies. ==== Future ==== * Eucalyptus version for Karmic should have fewer dependencies anyway from upstream refactoring. ==== How can the number of build/runtime dependencies be reduced? ==== * Get rid of anything not necessary * Geronimo spec packages (already provided by glassfish-j2ee) * Move parts into Eucalyptus code * Refactor packages (e.g. hibernate pulls in a lot of stuff) * Requires multiple source packages or only to promote some resulting binaries to main. (doko recommends duplicating the source package and documenting it) ==== What could be expected to be refused inclusion to main ==== * Active upstream criteria * Annogen * OpenSAML * WSS4J? * Known to be insecure * Nothing obvious * Partial builds (because of non-free dependencies) * Mule * We don't really care ==== Size issues (adding to default CD) ==== * GWT is 6MB of binary * 1.6 should be more granular and work with existing java packages more * JRuby is 3MB * Just be a build-time dependency of GWT * libjgroups-java, 3MB. Not needed ? * glassfish-toplink-essentials, 2.4MB, comes from hibernate * Avoiding JDK would save about 50MB of CD space * Avoiding GCJ would save about 20MB ==== Can we use the new Spring packaging from Debian? ==== * Not included yet in Debian, but work is underway * Might make too hard choices for us ? Testing from Eucalyptus side needed. ==== Safety net ==== * Keep a eucalyptus-javadeps package to drop in any problematic parts which can't be fixed (hibernate?). * One tiny part of Drools ==== Action Summary ==== * Which Eucalyptus version we'll use in Karmic and its dependencies? * Can we use Spring from Debian? * What can we do to reduce Hibernate size? * Will it be acceptable to move JBoss to main? * JDK dependency investigation * Ask Colin about blacklisting for the server seed only to solve GCJ issue * Once it's known what is required, start preparing/filing MIRs to avoid a last minute panic. |
Launchpad Entry: server-karmic-eucalyptus-in-main
Created: June 2nd, 2009
Contributors: ThierryCarrez
Packages affected: lots
Summary
Eucalyptus, as part of the Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, needs to move to main to be properly supported by Canonical. That means that all runtime and build-time dependencies (and all dependencies of the dependencies) must also move to main. This specification tracks which packages will need to move to main and efforts made to reduce the total number as much as possible.
Release Note
Eucalyptus is now part of the Ubuntu "main" repository, and fully supported by Canonical.
Rationale
Eucalyptus is currently in universe, together with most of its Java library dependencies. Since Eucalyptus is part of the Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud product, it needs to be properly supported by Canonical, which means move to the "main" repository. However, packages in "main" also need to have all their runtime and build-time dependencies in "main" as well. Java software in general heavily makes use of other Java libraries, so this quickly snowballs into a large number of packages to move to main. Furthermore, there isn't so much Java-based software in main already (OpenOffice.org, tomcat6) so even some basic Java libraries need to be moved.
User stories
- Dave has been trying the UEC technology preview in 9.04 and aims to deploy UEC with the 9.10 release. As it will no longer be a technology preview, it needs to be properly supported.
Assumptions
We need to try to keep the number of packages as small as possible in order to avoid MIR team overload. Some hacks (like duplicating some greedy source packages to avoid bringing lots of unnecessary build dependencies) are worth the trouble if they save a significant amount of packages. However Debian doesn't care about keeping the number of dependency packages small, so those hacks don't really make sense from a Debian perspective.
Design
Proposed actions for package number reduction
- libhibernate3-java in eucalyptus-javadeps : saves 34+ packages
- libhibernate-entity-manager in eucalyptus-javadeps : saves 10+ packages
- Use glassfish-javaee instead of geronimo-*
Remove dependency from libclassworlds-java -> maven-ant-helper: saves 8+ packages
- xmlbeans is no longer needed (Axis2 build dep) so removed libxmlbeans-java libsaxonb-java from list
- Add arch-based recommend in antlr3 + build as "any": removed antlr3-gcj from list
- Add arch-based recommend in libbcprov-java + build as "any": removed libbcprov-java-gcj from list
Resulting list (without those from RefactorEucalyptusJavadepsSpec)
Binary Package |
Runtime dep of |
Extra Build dep of |
antlr3 |
ej |
|
glassfish-javaee |
ej |
libjgroups-java |
glassfish-toplink-essentials |
|
libhibernate-annotations-java |
groovy |
ej |
|
janino |
ej |
|
junit4 |
groovy |
|
libasm2-java |
ej, groovy |
|
libasm3-java |
|
ej, libjarjar-java |
libasm-java |
ej, libcglib2.1-java |
|
libaspectwerkz2-java |
|
libcglib2.1-java |
libavalon-framework-java |
ej |
|
libbackport-util-concurrent-java |
libdom4j-java, libehcache-java |
|
libbcprov-java |
ej |
libjgroups-java |
libc3p0-java |
ej |
|
libcglib2.1-java |
ej |
|
libclassworlds-java |
groovy |
|
libcommons-cli-java |
ej, groovy |
|
libcommons-codec-java |
ej, libjaxme-java, libcommons-httpclient-java |
|
libcommons-fileupload-java |
ej |
|
libcommons-httpclient-java |
ej |
|
libcommons-io-java |
ej, libcommons-fileupload-java |
|
libcommons-jxpath-java |
ej |
|
libconcurrent-java |
|
libaspectwerz2-java |
libdom4j-java |
ej, libjaxen-java, libsaxonb-java |
|
libehcache-java |
ej |
|
libgoogle-collections-java |
ej |
|
libhibernate-annotations-java |
ej |
|
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java |
ej |
|
libjarjar-java |
|
libaspectwerkz2-java |
libjavassist-java |
ej |
|
libjaxen-java |
ej, libdom4j-java, libxom-java |
|
libjaxme-java |
libdom4j-java |
|
libjdom1-java |
ej, libcommons-jxpath-java, libjaxen-java, libsaxonb-java |
|
libjettison-java |
ej |
libxstream-java |
libjgroups-java |
|
libehcache-java |
libjibx-java |
ej |
|
libjmock-java |
|
libqdox-java |
libjoda-time-java |
|
libxstream-java |
libjrexx-java |
libaspectwerkz2-java |
|
libjsr107cache-java |
libehcache-java |
|
libjunitperf-java |
|
libdom4j-java |
libmockobjects-java |
ej, groovy |
|
libow-util-ant-tasks-java |
|
libasm-java, libasm2-java, libasm3-java |
libqdox-java |
libjibx-java |
ej, libcommons-attributes-java |
libslf4j-java |
ej |
|
libstringtemplate-java |
antlr3 |
|
libtrove-java |
|
libaspectwerkz2-java |
libwoodstox-java |
libjibx-java |
|
libxml-commons-external-java |
ej |
|
libxml-security-java |
ej |
|
libxom-java |
ej, libsaxonb-java |
|
libxpp2-java |
libdom4j-java |
|
libxpp3-java |
ej, libdom4j-java, groovy, libjibx-java |
|
libxstream-java |
ej, groovy |
|
New packages expected from RefactorEucalyptusJavadepsSpec
- Backport Util Concurrent 3.1
- Google Web Toolkit
- Spring
- Mule
- JUG
- Jetty 6
- Drools
- MVEL
Dependencies from Spring
Core dependencies
Package |
Dependency of |
Extra build dep of |
jruby1.1 |
|
Spring |
libcommons-attributes-java |
|
Spring |
libaopalliance-java |
|
Spring |
libjamon-java |
|
Spring |
Extra dependencies coming from Debian packaging
Note: we would patch so that it uses:
- libtomcat6-java instead on libtomcat5.5-java (avoiding libcommons-[el,launcher,modeler]-java)
- tomcat6-examples instead of glassfish-appserv
Package |
Dependency of |
Extra build dep of |
libjdo-api-java |
Spring |
|
libfreemarker-java |
Spring |
|
velocity |
Spring |
|
libjexcelapi-java |
Spring |
|
libstruts1.2-java |
Spring |
|
libibatis-java |
Spring |
|
libtiles-java |
Spring |
|
libquartz-java |
Spring |
|
libxapool-java |
Spring |
|
libvelocity-tools-java |
Spring |
|
testng |
Spring/test |
|
libjdom0-java |
libfreemarker-java, velocity |
|
libwerken.xpath-java |
velocity |
|
libcommons-digester-java |
libstruts1.2-java, libcommons-validator-java, libcommons-modeler-java, libtiles-java |
|
libcommons-validator-java |
libstruts1.2-java |
|
libcommons-beanutils-java |
libtiles-java |
|
Total
- 54 from primary list
- 20 from Refactor/Spring
Total: 82 packages to MIR
Other potential actions to reduce number of packages
Remove libcglib2.1-java -> libaspectwerkz2-java dependency, get rid of 5 packages
- Do a minimal Spring rather than take Debian spring, get rid of (at most) 16 packages
Implementation
tbd
Test/Demo Plan
It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during testing, and to show off after release. Please add an entry to http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Coverage/NewFeatures for tracking test coverage. This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.
Unresolved issues
This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.
BoF agenda and discussion
UDS discussion
Current status
- 99 packages which would need to move to main.
Java in main is currently driven by OpenOffice. Tomcat6 is there, but has few dependencies.
Future
- Eucalyptus version for Karmic should have fewer dependencies anyway from upstream refactoring.
How can the number of build/runtime dependencies be reduced?
- Get rid of anything not necessary
- Geronimo spec packages (already provided by glassfish-j2ee)
- Move parts into Eucalyptus code
- Refactor packages (e.g. hibernate pulls in a lot of stuff)
- Requires multiple source packages or only to promote some resulting binaries to main.
- (doko recommends duplicating the source package and documenting it)
- Requires multiple source packages or only to promote some resulting binaries to main.
What could be expected to be refused inclusion to main
- Active upstream criteria
- Annogen
- OpenSAML
- WSS4J?
- Known to be insecure
- Nothing obvious
- Partial builds (because of non-free dependencies)
- Mule
- We don't really care
Size issues (adding to default CD)
- GWT is 6MB of binary
- 1.6 should be more granular and work with existing java packages more
- JRuby is 3MB
- Just be a build-time dependency of GWT
- libjgroups-java, 3MB. Not needed ?
- glassfish-toplink-essentials, 2.4MB, comes from hibernate
- Avoiding JDK would save about 50MB of CD space
- Avoiding GCJ would save about 20MB
Can we use the new Spring packaging from Debian?
- Not included yet in Debian, but work is underway
- Might make too hard choices for us ? Testing from Eucalyptus side needed.
Safety net
- Keep a eucalyptus-javadeps package to drop in any problematic parts which can't be fixed (hibernate?).
- One tiny part of Drools
Action Summary
- Which Eucalyptus version we'll use in Karmic and its dependencies?
- Can we use Spring from Debian?
- What can we do to reduce Hibernate size?
- Will it be acceptable to move JBoss to main?
- JDK dependency investigation
- Ask Colin about blacklisting for the server seed only to solve GCJ issue
- Once it's known what is required, start preparing/filing MIRs to avoid a last minute panic.
EucalyptusInMainSpec (last edited 2009-08-10 09:46:57 by lns-bzn-48f-81-56-218-246)