ForumsGovernance

Differences between revisions 2 and 75 (spanning 73 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2006-10-20 09:04:33
Size: 10959
Editor: 87-194-36-33
Comment:
Revision 75 as of 2017-11-27 15:50:48
Size: 6213
Editor: bryanquigley
Comment: just update links
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
THIS IS A ROUGH DRAFT BY MAKO FROM JUNE 2006. == Forums Community Governance Codification ==
Line 3: Line 3:
It needs formatting still. The [[https://ubuntuforums.org|Ubuntu Forums]] represent many people's first meeting with Ubuntu. They are an important resource for support and social interactions. The forums were started as an independent project by Ryan Troy in 2004 and their rapid success was officially recognized when they were designated as the Official Ubuntu Forums.
Line 5: Line 5:
This a draft. Everything here is completely open for discussion and
reevaluation. It is, as of the time of writing, the work of only two
people and will only represent those views until you start on it.
Additionally, this document can updated with time when it stops working.
For example, if a 3-5 person board becomes problematic, we can change it.
Changes to this can be made by agreement of both the FC and the CC.
This document aims to:
Line 12: Line 7:
Finally, it should go without saying but may still benefit from being said:  * Provide a clear explanation of the existing leadership in the forums.
Line 14: Line 9:
  This document is *not* meant as an attack on the current forums staff
  or administrators.
  
  The forums are one of the largest and smoothest running parts of the Ubuntu
  community. This document aims to help create a more documented, democratic,
  accessible governance structure for the forums and to integrate it into the
  rest of the Ubuntu community.
  
  The best way to solve a problem is to prevent it from ever happening. At a
  moment when the forums are running more smoothly than ever, it seems an
  ideal moment to help pave the road for a long and smooth future.
 * Describe clear processes for the appointment of leadership and staff positions in the forums.
Line 26: Line 11:
Forums Community Governance Codification
==========================================
 * Describe methods for both preventing and resolving any future inter-administrator or inter-staff conflicts within the forums.
Line 29: Line 13:
The forums represent many people's first meeting with Ubuntu and is an
important resource for support and social interactions and have become
one of the most important subprojects within Ubuntu. They are the
single largest GNU/Linux support forums and one of the most important
venues for community support and interaction. Started independently
by Ryan Troy two years ago, their rapid success was recognized when
they were designated as the Official Ubuntu Forums.

In a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons, the forums have not
been given the recognition that they deserve. Their governance systems
remain both separate and isolated from the Ubuntu decision-making
system. While the forums have built successful and effective internal
governance systems, including their resolution center, their
relationship to the rest of the Ubuntu is less clear. The forums
currently have no CC-delegated governance council and no official
team delegation.

The Official Ubuntu Forums have not been given an opportunity to live
up to their name. This specification, which ultimately aims to be
approved by both the current forum staff and the Ubuntu
Community Council, tries to lay out a plan for bringing the Ubuntu
forums into the fold.

A closer relationship between Ubuntu and the forums will:

* Increase recognition of contributions in the forums with membership
  which is ultimately used to approve community council members.

* Provide a clear delegation and codifications of the existing
  leadership in the forums and plan for handling these decisions in
  the future.

* Describe clear democratic and meritocratic processes for
  the appointment of leadership and staff positions in the forums.

* Remove several "single points of failure". (this is not an attack on
  the people who currently fill those roles, but a recognition that
  single points of failure are problematic)

* Describe methods for both preventing and resolving any future
  inter-administrator or inter-staff conflicts within the forums.

* Recognize the hard work of the forums staff through recognition as
  an integral and *integrated* part of the forums community.

* Provide a straightforward process for top forums contributors to
  be recognised as full members in Ubuntu, with the right to vote on
  resolutions posed by the Community Council.

* Provide for a reporting process so that news, ideas and work done
  in the project by Forums users will be communicated to the broader
  community and appropriately recognised.

Changes to Current Ubuntu Policy
================================

The proposal includes both new policy and the codification of a few
existing Ubuntu policies. These should be discussed with the CC and
the forum staff. After it has been approved by the CC we will add it
to the `community governance page`__ in the Ubuntu website.

__ http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/governance

Note that the document is structured to describe NOT JUST the Forums,
but instead all the areas of the project which are large and independent
enough to have their own dedicated leadership structures.

  == Team Councils ==

  Whereas small teams are governed by consensus and frequently
  directed by a team leader appointed by the Community Council,
  several projects within Ubuntu (e.g., Kubuntu, Edubuntu, the Ubuntu
  Forums) are large and established enough that they have their own
  internal governance structures. These most important of these
  structures is the *Team Council*.

  The members of team councils are appointed by the community council
  under consideration of input from the existing team council and
  leaders and participants of the subproject or team. In all cases,
  the CC aims to choose leaders who are well known, experienced, and
  respected within team and in the larger community. The input of the
  current team leadership and members play the single most important
  role in appointing team council members.

  Councils play different roles in different subprojects but they act
  as an extension of and serve a role similar to the CC within their
  subproject. They create and review rules and guidelines and resolve
  conflicts or enforce rules where necessary. In some situations,
  consideration of membership applications is delegated to team councils
  by the community council. Like all teams in Ubuntu, their technical
  and non-technical decisions are subject to review or appeal to the
  Ubuntu Technical Board and Community Council respectively. Conflicts
  *within* team councils are resolved by the Community Council.

This would attempt to describe both what we're planning on doing here
and would apply to the current Kubuntu and Edubuntu councils.

New Forums Governance Policy
============================

The following new policy will be implemented after drafting and
approval by the current forums administrators an the Ubuntu community
council.

It should also be added to `the forums guidelines page`__.

__ http://ubuntuforums.org/index.php?page=policy

Forums Council
--------------

The Ubuntu Community Council will create a new Forums Council (FC)
(similar in effect to the Kubuntu and Edubuntu councils). The FC will
consist of and take on the roles of the administrators.

This board would:

* Consist of between 3-5 members. Membership should be public and
  published. FC members should be accessible by and responsive to the
  forums community.

* Hold meetings regularly and visibly. Meetings can either be in IRC in the
  "ubuntu-meeting" channel or in a special, publicly visible
  area or subarea on the forums. (Of course, "meeting" is
  perhaps a bad term in this case. Input/help describing this would be
  nice.) This can be in addition to existing private staff-only forums.

* Be appointed by the Ubuntu Community Council. Nominations would be
  public but would be considered and evaluated by the CC based on a
  number of criteria. In order of importance, this criteria would
  include:

  - Opinions and testimonials (positive and negative) of current
    members of the forums council;

  - Opinions and testimonials from current forums staff;

  - Opinions and testimonials from Ubuntu Members, Ubunteros, and
    other active participants in the Ubuntu forums.

  - Clear evidence of activity within the forums (quality, quantity
    and duration);

* Serve terms of three (3) years. FC members could serve multiple or
  repeated terms. Weight will be given to proved contributors and
  reelection of consistently active members should be both easy and
  common.

* Be formed, initially, of the current forums administrators (i.e.,
  Ryan Troy, Kassetra, John Dong, and Mike Braniff). We might want to
  add another admin next year or appoint/reappoint two members next
  year.

The FC would have a number of rights and responsibilities. These
include:

* First and foremost, the current rights responsibilities of the
  Ubuntu forums administrators. :)

* Appointing new moderators and forums staff. While the criteria for
  these appointments are ultimately up to the FC, these appointments
  should take into account similar criteria to the CC in considering
  new FC members.

* Resolving disputes between forums staff and moderators as per the
  existing dispute resolution system and forums guidelines.

* With advice, feedback, and help from the forums staff, maintaining
  and enforcing the Forums Guidelines and associated infrastructure
  (e.g., the resolution center).

* Regularly and when possible, sending a representative to CC members
  to weigh in on issues of membership and to update the council on the
  FC business.
  
* With time and once things are running smoothly, the CC will delegate
  membership decisions to the council so that the FC can appoint new
  Ubuntu members without direct oversight or permission from the CC.

Forums Staff
----------------------------

Forums staff will be appointed by the forums council. They have terms
of one year and can be reappointed to additional terms by the FC when
their terms expire.

Forums staff should be Members of Ubuntu, and should set an example that
is consistent with the Ubuntu Code of Conduct.
 * Provide a straightforward process for forums staff to be recognized as full members in Ubuntu, with the right to vote on resolutions posed by the Community Council.
Line 219: Line 16:
Ubuntu Membership for Forums Participants
-----------------------------------------
== Wider Ubuntu Community Policy ==
Line 222: Line 18:
Forums staff and participants have the option to become Ubuntu members.
Current staff can apply for membership at an Ubuntu CC meeting. Their contributions as staff
members and contributors on the forums should provide more than
sufficient evidence of a sustained and significant contribution to
the Ubuntu community.
The forums are part of the wider Ubuntu community which is governed as described on [[https://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/governance|the governance page]] of the Ubuntu website.
Line 228: Line 20:
Note that the document above is structured to describe NOT JUST the Forums, but all the areas of the project which are large and independent enough to have their own dedicated leadership structures.
Line 229: Line 22:
Dispute Resolution
-----------------------
== Team Councils ==
Line 232: Line 24:
There need to be no significant changes to the way that inter-user or
staff-user disputes are handled in the forums. The FC will continue to
maintain the forums guidelines and the resolution center.
For active teams and subprojects with Ubuntu, the Ubuntu Community council delegates many of its responsibilities to "Team Councils." These councils act as proxies for the Community Council over a particular team or scope of activity within the Ubuntu community. These governance councils are ultimately responsible for the actions and activity within their team or scope and resolves disputes and manage policies and procedures internal to their team and frequently appoint Ubuntu members on behalf of the CC.
Line 236: Line 26:
There should be a method whereby any disagreements or conflicts
*between* moderators can request a hearing by the FC.
The Ubuntu Forums Council (FC) is the team governance council for the the official Ubuntu forums.
Line 239: Line 28:
In extreme situations only, users and moderators who feel
that they have not been given a fair hearing by the FC can appeal a
decision to the CC. The CC considers the FC to be a greater authority
on forums matters and in the majority of these cases, the CC
will likely refer these issues back to the FC.
== Forums Council Charter ==
Line 245: Line 30:
Any deadlock within the FC will can be referred to the community
council for resolution.
The forums council is the group that is ultimately responsible for the governing the forums and interfacing between the forums and the rest of the Ubuntu community and governance systems. It will:
Line 248: Line 32:
All forums issues, including those that involve the CC, should occur
not in IRC, but in a special, public forum in the Ubuntu Forums.
 * Consist of five to seven members. Membership should be public and published.

 * Decisions will be made by a majority of voting forums council members when at least three and more than half of the total members have voted.

 * FC members should be accessible by and responsive to the forums community (i.e., through a dedicated forum).

 * Hold "meetings" regularly and visibly. Meetings can either be in IRC in the "ubuntu-meeting" channel or in a special, publicly visible area or sub-forum.

 * Be appointed by the Ubuntu Community Council in consultation with the Forums Council, forums staff, and active contributors to the forums. Nominations would be open and public and would be considered and evaluated by the CC. Each candidate should prepare a wiki page summarizing their nomination and their contributions and including and referencing testimonials (e.g., something similar to what is prepared for Ubuntu membership). The CC commits to evaluating all nominations on the following criteria, listed in order of importance:

  * The nominees active status as an Ubuntu member ''(essential)''.
  * The nominees support from ''at least'' one active forum staff member (essential).
  * Opinions and testimonials (positive and negative) from current members of the forums council;
  * Opinions and testimonials from current forums staff;
  * Opinions and testimonials from Ubuntu Members, Ubunteros, and other active participants in the forums;
  * Clear evidence of activity within the forums (quality, quantity and duration);

 * Serve terms of two (2) years. FC members could serve multiple or repeated terms. Weight will be given to proved contributors and reelection of consistently active members should be both easy and common.

 * Be formed, initially, of the current forums administrators (i.e., Ryan Troy (Ubuntu-Geek), John Dong (jdong), and Mike Braniff (KiwiNZ)).
 
 * Have a chairman with a casting vote, appointed by the Community Council, initially to be Ryan Troy.

The FC would have a number of rights and responsibilities, and be ultimately responsible for the smooth operation of the forums. These include:

 * Appointing or recalling administrators, moderators and forums staff or determining criteria by which they are appointed.

 * Resolving disputes between forums staff and moderators as per the existing dispute resolution system and forums guidelines.

 * With advice, feedback, and help from the forums staff, maintaining and enforcing the Forums Guidelines and associated infrastructure (e.g., the resolution center).

 * Regularly and when possible (i.e., monthly), sending reports or representatives to CC members to weigh in on issues of membership and to update the council on the FC business.

=== Staff and Ubuntu Membership ===

Forums staff will be appointed by the forums council. Forums staff are expected to uphold and set an example that is consistent with the Code of Conduct.

Forums staff and participants have the option to become Ubuntu members. Current staff can apply for membership at an Ubuntu CC meeting. Their contributions as staff members and contributors on the forums should provide more than sufficient evidence of a sustained and significant contribution to the Ubuntu community.

=== Dispute Resolution ===

The FC will be responsible for maintaining forum guidelines and systems for internal conflict resolution (e.g., the forums resolution center).

Additionally, there should provide a documented method whereby any disagreements or conflicts ''between'' moderators can request a hearing by the FC.

In extreme situations, users and moderators who feel that they have not been given a fair hearing by the FC can appeal a decision to the CC. The CC considers the FC to be a greater authority on forums matters and in the majority of these cases, the CC will likely refer these issues back to the FC.

Any deadlock within the FC will can be referred to the community council for resolution.

Forums Community Governance Codification

The Ubuntu Forums represent many people's first meeting with Ubuntu. They are an important resource for support and social interactions. The forums were started as an independent project by Ryan Troy in 2004 and their rapid success was officially recognized when they were designated as the Official Ubuntu Forums.

This document aims to:

  • Provide a clear explanation of the existing leadership in the forums.
  • Describe clear processes for the appointment of leadership and staff positions in the forums.
  • Describe methods for both preventing and resolving any future inter-administrator or inter-staff conflicts within the forums.
  • Provide a straightforward process for forums staff to be recognized as full members in Ubuntu, with the right to vote on resolutions posed by the Community Council.

Wider Ubuntu Community Policy

The forums are part of the wider Ubuntu community which is governed as described on the governance page of the Ubuntu website.

Note that the document above is structured to describe NOT JUST the Forums, but all the areas of the project which are large and independent enough to have their own dedicated leadership structures.

Team Councils

For active teams and subprojects with Ubuntu, the Ubuntu Community council delegates many of its responsibilities to "Team Councils." These councils act as proxies for the Community Council over a particular team or scope of activity within the Ubuntu community. These governance councils are ultimately responsible for the actions and activity within their team or scope and resolves disputes and manage policies and procedures internal to their team and frequently appoint Ubuntu members on behalf of the CC.

The Ubuntu Forums Council (FC) is the team governance council for the the official Ubuntu forums.

Forums Council Charter

The forums council is the group that is ultimately responsible for the governing the forums and interfacing between the forums and the rest of the Ubuntu community and governance systems. It will:

  • Consist of five to seven members. Membership should be public and published.
  • Decisions will be made by a majority of voting forums council members when at least three and more than half of the total members have voted.
  • FC members should be accessible by and responsive to the forums community (i.e., through a dedicated forum).
  • Hold "meetings" regularly and visibly. Meetings can either be in IRC in the "ubuntu-meeting" channel or in a special, publicly visible area or sub-forum.
  • Be appointed by the Ubuntu Community Council in consultation with the Forums Council, forums staff, and active contributors to the forums. Nominations would be open and public and would be considered and evaluated by the CC. Each candidate should prepare a wiki page summarizing their nomination and their contributions and including and referencing testimonials (e.g., something similar to what is prepared for Ubuntu membership). The CC commits to evaluating all nominations on the following criteria, listed in order of importance:
    • The nominees active status as an Ubuntu member (essential).

    • The nominees support from at least one active forum staff member (essential).

    • Opinions and testimonials (positive and negative) from current members of the forums council;
    • Opinions and testimonials from current forums staff;
    • Opinions and testimonials from Ubuntu Members, Ubunteros, and other active participants in the forums;
    • Clear evidence of activity within the forums (quality, quantity and duration);
  • Serve terms of two (2) years. FC members could serve multiple or repeated terms. Weight will be given to proved contributors and reelection of consistently active members should be both easy and common.
  • Be formed, initially, of the current forums administrators (i.e., Ryan Troy (Ubuntu-Geek), John Dong (jdong), and Mike Braniff (KiwiNZ)).
  • Have a chairman with a casting vote, appointed by the Community Council, initially to be Ryan Troy.

The FC would have a number of rights and responsibilities, and be ultimately responsible for the smooth operation of the forums. These include:

  • Appointing or recalling administrators, moderators and forums staff or determining criteria by which they are appointed.
  • Resolving disputes between forums staff and moderators as per the existing dispute resolution system and forums guidelines.
  • With advice, feedback, and help from the forums staff, maintaining and enforcing the Forums Guidelines and associated infrastructure (e.g., the resolution center).
  • Regularly and when possible (i.e., monthly), sending reports or representatives to CC members to weigh in on issues of membership and to update the council on the FC business.

Staff and Ubuntu Membership

Forums staff will be appointed by the forums council. Forums staff are expected to uphold and set an example that is consistent with the Code of Conduct.

Forums staff and participants have the option to become Ubuntu members. Current staff can apply for membership at an Ubuntu CC meeting. Their contributions as staff members and contributors on the forums should provide more than sufficient evidence of a sustained and significant contribution to the Ubuntu community.

Dispute Resolution

The FC will be responsible for maintaining forum guidelines and systems for internal conflict resolution (e.g., the forums resolution center).

Additionally, there should provide a documented method whereby any disagreements or conflicts between moderators can request a hearing by the FC.

In extreme situations, users and moderators who feel that they have not been given a fair hearing by the FC can appeal a decision to the CC. The CC considers the FC to be a greater authority on forums matters and in the majority of these cases, the CC will likely refer these issues back to the FC.

Any deadlock within the FC will can be referred to the community council for resolution.

ForumsGovernance (last edited 2017-11-27 15:50:48 by bryanquigley)