libffado
3337
Comment:
|
4286
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 7: | Line 7: |
0. ''Availability:'' [[http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libf/libffado/]]; available for i386 and amd64 architectures? <style="color:red">'''not sure about ppc'''</style> | 0. ''Availability:'' [[http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libf/libffado/]]; available for i386 and amd64 architectures. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
* Why is this package needed? What feature(s) does it add? Does upstream expect it? Plain text description of expected use * Build dependency of ... * |
* provides library for support of FireWire based audio devices |
Line 13: | Line 11: |
* [[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=PRODUCT_NAME|CVE entries]]: ... * [[http://secunia.com/search/?search=PRODUCT_NAME|Secunia history]]: ... |
* [[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=libffado|CVE entries]]: '''none''' * [[http://secunia.com/search/?search=libffado|Secunia history]]: '''none''' |
Line 16: | Line 14: |
* Network activity: does it open any port ? Does it handle incoming network data ? * Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? * Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.) |
* '''do not know''' * '''do not know''' * Network activity: does it open any port ? '''no''' * Does it handle incoming network data ? '''no''' * Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? '''no''' |
Line 20: | Line 20: |
* In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? * Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? * [[http://bugs.debian.org/src:SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME|Debian bugs]]: (mention any that are particularly relevant, and any showstoppers) * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/S/SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME.html|Maintenance in Debian]] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? * [[http://|Upstream]] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? * [[http://|Upstream bug tracker]]: (mention any particularly relevant or critical) * Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? |
* In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? '''n/a''' * Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? '''no''' * [[http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libffado|Debian bugs]]: (mention any that are particularly relevant, and any showstoppers) '''None found for libffado, libffado-dbus-server, libffado-mixer-qt4, libffado-tools, libffado-dev or libffado1''' * [[http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libffado.html|Maintenance in Debian]] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? '''Maintenances in Debian appears to be vigorous''' * [[http://subversion.ffado.org/|Upstream]] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? '''There appears to be vigorous activity upstream''' * [[http://subversion.ffado.org/report|Upstream bug tracker]]: (mention any particularly relevant or critical) '''no noticeably relevant or critical bugs''' * Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? '''This package does deal with hardware, but none is exotic''' |
Line 36: | Line 36: |
* ... * Are these all in main ? |
* '''libc6 (>= 2.4)''' * '''libexpat1 (>= 1.95.8)''' * '''libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1)''' * '''libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0)''' * '''libglibmm-2.4-1c2a (>= 2.19.8)''' * '''libiec61883-0 (>= 1.2.0)''' * '''libraw1394-11''' * '''libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2)''' * '''libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)''' * '''libxml++2.6-2 (>= 2.24.0)''' * '''libxml2 (>= 2.6.27)''' * Are these all in main ? '''yes''' |
Line 39: | Line 49: |
* How much maintenance is this package likely to need ? (Simple packages may largely take care of themselves; complex packages will need dedicated developers paying attention to them.) * Who is responsible for monitoring the quality of this package and fixing its bugs ? Are they Ubuntu or Debian developers ? * Who is the package bug contact in Ubuntu? (Needs one if its a nontrivial package which does not fully maintain itself through Debian) |
* How much maintenance is this package likely to need ? (Simple packages may largely take care of themselves; complex packages will need dedicated developers paying attention to them.) '''Little maintenance should be required''' * Who is responsible for monitoring the quality of this package and fixing its bugs ? Are they Ubuntu or Debian developers ? '''Upstream (FFADO) developers along with Ubuntu developers''' * Who is the package bug contact in Ubuntu? (Needs one if its a nontrivial package which does not fully maintain itself through Debian) '''[[https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev|Ubuntu Studio developers]]''' |
Line 43: | Line 53: |
* The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain. * What do upstream call this software ? Has it had different names in the past ? |
* The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain. '''It should already be clear''' * What do upstream call this software ? Has it had different names in the past ? '''Upstream calls this software FFADO (Free FireWire Audio Drivers). It was previously know as FreeBoB''' |
In progress |
Main Inclusion Report for libffado
Requirements
Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libf/libffado/; available for i386 and amd64 architectures.
Rationale:
provides library for support of FireWire based audio devices
Security:
CVE entries: none
Secunia history: none
- Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? Any daemons ?
do not know
do not know
Network activity: does it open any port ? no
Does it handle incoming network data ? no
Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? no
Quality assurance:
In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? n/a
Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? no
Debian bugs: (mention any that are particularly relevant, and any showstoppers) None found for libffado, libffado-dbus-server, libffado-mixer-qt4, libffado-tools, libffado-dev or libffado1
Maintenance in Debian is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? Maintenances in Debian appears to be vigorous
Upstream is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? There appears to be vigorous activity upstream
Upstream bug tracker: (mention any particularly relevant or critical) no noticeably relevant or critical bugs
Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? This package does deal with hardware, but none is exotic
- Is there a test suite in the upstream source or packaging ? Is it enabled to run in the build ?
UI standards:
- User-visible strings are internationalized using standard gettext system ?
- Package with translatable strings builds a PO template during package build ?
- End-user applications ship a desktop file ?
Standards compliance:
FHS, Debian Policy compliance ?
- Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? Patch system ? Any packaging oddities ?
Dependencies:
libc6 (>= 2.4)
libexpat1 (>= 1.95.8)
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1)
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0)
libglibmm-2.4-1c2a (>= 2.19.8)
libiec61883-0 (>= 1.2.0)
libraw1394-11
libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2)
libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)
libxml++2.6-2 (>= 2.24.0)
libxml2 (>= 2.6.27)
Are these all in main ? yes
Maintenance:
How much maintenance is this package likely to need ? (Simple packages may largely take care of themselves; complex packages will need dedicated developers paying attention to them.) Little maintenance should be required
Who is responsible for monitoring the quality of this package and fixing its bugs ? Are they Ubuntu or Debian developers ? Upstream (FFADO) developers along with Ubuntu developers
Who is the package bug contact in Ubuntu? (Needs one if its a nontrivial package which does not fully maintain itself through Debian) Ubuntu Studio developers
Background information:
The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain. It should already be clear
What do upstream call this software ? Has it had different names in the past ? Upstream calls this software FFADO (Free FireWire Audio Drivers). It was previously know as FreeBoB
Internationalization:
- Are graphical applications translatable? Do they support gettext?
Reviewers
MIR bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/BUGNUMBER
The author of this report should put their name here; reviewers will add comments etc. too'
MainInclusionReport/libffado (last edited 2009-08-21 03:35:32 by conr-adsl-209-169-122-85)