20110411
Differences between revisions 2 and 3
1338
Comment:
|
2093
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
== Meeting (DRAFT) == | == Meeting == |
Line 28: | Line 28: |
* jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!) | |
Line 30: | Line 31: |
* usn microsite | |
Line 32: | Line 34: |
* last week: Unity, patch pilot * catch-up on state of kernel hardening * beta-2 and QRT * pending updates |
|
Line 37: | Line 43: |
* last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa * pending updates |
|
Line 39: | Line 47: |
* chromuium regression | |
Line 43: | Line 52: |
* UDS topics | * UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add |
Line 45: | Line 54: |
* enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine * Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace |
Meeting
Who: SecurityTeam
End: 17:30 UTC
Where: #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Chaired By: JamieStrandboge (jdstrand)
Attendance
- kees
- mdeslaur
- sbeattie
- micahg
- jjohansen
- jdstrand
Not present
- None
Agenda
- Review of any previous action items
- Comodo aftermath should be done (excepting chromium-browser?)
- Weekly stand-up report (each member discusses any pending and planned future work for the week)
- jdstrand
- Weekly role: happy place
- short week last week
- kde updates
- bisect two natty bugs, follow-up on various other bugs
- jjohansen offered to help with builds (thanks!)
- archive admin for Beta-2
- performance reviews
- usn microsite
- kees
- Weekly role: happy place
- last week: Unity, patch pilot
- catch-up on state of kernel hardening
- beta-2 and QRT
- pending updates
- mdeslaur
- Weekly role: community
- pending updates
- sbeattie
- Weekly role: triage
last week: good progress on automated AppArmor builds via jenkins ppa
- pending updates
- micahg
- Weekly role: happy place
- chromuium regression
- pending updates
- jdstrand
- Miscellaneous and Questions
- hardy desktop eol May 12th
- performance reviews are entered into the system
- UDS topics: for now just keep individual lists for what to bring forward/review/add
- apparmor in Debian
- enable in kernel and ship a reduced userspace? jjohansen says that should be fine
Debian won't enable AppArmor because it can't be compiled as a module. LSMs can't be compiled as modules, so non-starter. This is an odd stance since they have selinux compiled in, no tomoyo in the kernel but with tomoyo userspace, and neither AppArmor kernel or userspace
- usn microsite
Log
Logs available at http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/
MeetingLogs/Security/20110411 (last edited 2011-04-11 18:46:50 by pool-71-114-233-7)