2011-01-03-SR

Differences between revisions 117 and 134 (spanning 17 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 117 as of 2010-11-23 00:35:30 →
Size: 10135
Editor: 99-191-111-134
Comment:
← Revision 134 as of 2011-01-03 17:52:04 → ⇥
Size: 10391
Editor: 99-191-111-134
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 12: Line 12:
 * none (first meeting after all ;) )  * 2010-11-22
  * [cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul] - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555 - ???
  * [victorp] look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting - DONE
  * [pedro, marjo] - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting. - DONE
 * 2010-12-03
  * [pitti, kees, sconklin] - get together and propose adjustments process if needed, then broadcast new dates. - DONE
  * [skaet] call meeting to discussing outcome of sconklin's meeting with pitti and kees. - DONE
Line 17: Line 23:
   * Release-targeted bugs (snapshot 2010/11/17)    * Release-targeted bugs (snapshot 2011/01/03 (2010/12/06) )
Line 20: Line 26:
|| Maverick || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+bugs| 333 ]] || [[ http://goo.gl/l7FIy | 2 ]] || 55 || 66 ||
|| Lucid || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+bugs|623 ]] || [[ http://goo.gl/N5cPc | 5 ]] || 113 || 161 ||
|| Karmic || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs|283]] || 3 || 39 || 115 ||
|| Hardy || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+bugs|458]] || 0 || 65 || 180 ||
|| Dapper || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/+bugs|211]] || 1 || 14 || 67 ||		 || Maverick || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+bugs| 377 (+37) ]] || [[ http://goo.gl/l7FIy | 5 (+3) ]] || 63 (+4) || 80 (+8) ||
|| Lucid || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+bugs|666 (+24) ]] || [[http://goo.gl/N5cPc | 4 (-1) ]] || 122 (+6) || 175 (+6)||
|| Karmic || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs|284 (-2)]] || [[http://goo.gl/7Ek7t | 3 (0) ]] || 37 (-1) || 114 (-1) ||
|| Hardy || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+bugs|455 (-4)]] || [[http://goo.gl/UYE2K| 0 (0) ]] || 62 (-3) || 179 (-4) ||
|| Dapper || [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/+bugs|209 (-3)]] || [[http://goo.gl/xHuIU| 1 (0) ]] || 14 (0) || 67 (-1) ||
Line 63: Line 69:
    * Bug:635344:After my CD-Rom is ejected, the tray will instantly retract. ''[sconklin] - need to determine if can come up with fix for RC and where fix needs to happen''     * Bug:635344:After my CD-Rom is ejected, the tray will instantly retract. ''[sconklin] - need to determine if can come up with fix for RC and where fix needs to happen 2010-11-26, update?''
Line 68: Line 74:
    * Bug:563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot - ''[cjwatson] - release candiate, on list''     * Bug:579850: mount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint - ''?''
Line 73: Line 79:
  * Resolved
    * Bug:563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot - ''FIX COMMITTED''
Line 76: Line 85:
    * Bug:671103:backport grub-legacy-ec2 from maverick to lucid - ''[cjwatson] - accepted for validation already - will go out as SRU ''     * None
  * Resolved
    * None
Line 81: Line 92:
    * Bug:525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz - ''[pitti] - pending finding an OOo maintainer''
    * Bug:625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases - ''[pitti] - will investigate ''		     * Bug:525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz - ''[pitti] - pending finding an OOo maintainer; pretty much "can't fix" until then''
    * Bug:625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases - ''[pitti] - just needs an upload and test, pinged Martin-Eric on the bug''
Line 87: Line 98:
  * ''[ScottK via IRC on ubuntu-devel 11/22] - Tech board has approved putting KDE point releases into -updates. Kubuntu will update to KDE 4.4.5 (and 4.4.7 for kdepim) for 10.04.2''   * Kubuntu will update to KDE 4.4.5 (and 4.4.7 for kdepim) for 10.04.2 - ''[ScottK] KDE 4.4.5 is pending in lucid-proposed, has been marked verification done, so should make it into 1/27 drop with no issues''
Line 91: Line 102:

  * Recent
    * Lucid shipped on 12/20 ( tracked: http://launchpad.net/bugs/683425 )
    * Maverick shipped on 12/20 ( tracked: http://launchpad.net/bugs/683422 )

  * Next
    * -ec2 pending testing
    * Karmic - validation in progress, in general, karmic and earlier don't follow 2 week cadence and will rely on traditional community testing/burn in cycle unless resources available from testing teams.
    * 1/6 - will be skipped, nothing in queue over holidays - probably should take this into account on future scheduling.
    * Lucid - 1/27
    * Maverick - 1/27
    * Security - ?? not aware of any hot issues to force earlier at this point.
Line 98: Line 121:
  Notes:
  * ''[cjwatson] sponsored 671097 and milestoned this for server team''
  * ''[cjwatwon] bug 554172, don't know a good fix. Need discussion on solutions, see action items''
  * ''[victorp] certification testing for lucid done on ubuntu for netbooks, desktop edition (laptops and pc) sevrers, i386 and amd64) testing link: http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html''
  * ''[skaet] decision to ship lucid SRU update without regression testing formalized, some concern on it not baking for a week - reverts not reseting -proposed is the concern''
  * ''[skaet] shipping maverick SRU will be decided after we get result of SRU testing - action taken to call meeting to discuss tomorrow''
Line 109: Line 125:
  * what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure?

  * Current SRU status:
    * http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sru/latest.html

  * Questions:		   * [[http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sru/latest.html|Current SRU status]]

  * Questions:
    * what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure?
Line 116: Line 130:
    * is there a report that details the regression run report for the current SRU kernel update? ''[pedro] will take an action to provide next time ''     * is there a report that details the regression run report for the current SRU kernel update? ''[pedro] took an action to provide this time ''
Line 123: Line 137:
  * what is the status of the hardware certification infrastructure automation?   * SRU Testing for Lucid and Maverick
   * [[http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/current|Latest Test Results]]
   * [[http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/|Test Results Archive]]
Line 126: Line 142:
    * is there a report that illustrates the results of the last cerification run? ( is http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html still in use ) - ''[victorp] see http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html, was request to add architectures, and extend to releases ''

  * Questions:
    * how much time should be allocated for automated certification run, in planning? (assuming no significant regression)		     * overview of schedule and window? Ara's calendar

  * Questions:
    * any adjustment to 2-day time allocated for automated certification run, in planning? (assuming no significant regression)
Line 156: Line 172:
   * Questions:
    * Should this link be updated? : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/StableReleaseTracker -- ''[[zul] - this is obsolete''
    * Is this the official one? : http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html -- ''[zul] - this is the one to use''		  * [[http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html|Server tracked bugs]]

 * Questions:
Line 203: Line 218:
   * http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-meeting.log.20101122_1002.html
   * http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-meeting.20101122_1002.html		    * http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-meeting.log.20110103_1000.html
   * http://www.novarata.net/mootbot/ubuntu-meeting.20110103_1000.html
Line 207: Line 222:
 * [cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul] - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555
 * [victorp] look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting
 * [pedro, marjo] - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting.
 * [victorp, pedro, bjf, skaet] to set date for next target SRU release. We'll be skipping Dec. 2.
 * [skaet, victorp, bjf, pitti] - meet to discuss SRU release of maverick post hardware cert testing results 		 * marjo, bdmurray: triage lucid and maverick new bug surge over holidays - with focus on 10.04.2 coming up.
 * skaet: broadcast freeze date for 10.04.2
 * skaet: update natty interlock wiki with revised SRU biweekly milestones (testing week, verification week, drop, release to be clarified)

Stable Release Team Agenda

  • PURPOSE: collaborate on stable release updates and long term support point releases

  • FREQUENCY: bi-weekly meeting

  • ACTIVE RELEASES: Maverick, Lucid, Karmic, Hardy, Dapper

  • RELEASE LIFECYCLE STATUS: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

Actions from Last Meeting

  • 2010-11-22
    • [cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul] - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555 - ???
    • [victorp] look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting - DONE
    • [pedro, marjo] - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting. - DONE
  • 2010-12-03
    • [pitti, kees, sconklin] - get together and propose adjustments process if needed, then broadcast new dates. - DONE
    • [skaet] call meeting to discussing outcome of sconklin's meeting with pitti and kees. - DONE

Features and Bugs Summary

  • Release-targeted bugs (snapshot 2011/01/03 (2010/12/06) )

Release

Bugs Open

Critical

High

New

Maverick

377 (+37)

5 (+3)

63 (+4)

80 (+8)

Lucid

666 (+24)

4 (-1)

122 (+6)

175 (+6)

Karmic

284 (-2)

3 (0)

37 (-1)

114 (-1)

Hardy

455 (-4)

0 (0)

62 (-3)

179 (-4)

Dapper

209 (-3)

1 (0)

14 (0)

67 (-1)

10.04.2 Long Term Support Status

Planned Release Date: February 17, 2011

Kernel

  • Unresolved Important Bugs

    • 635344:After my CD-Rom is ejected, the tray will instantly retract. [sconklin] - need to determine if can come up with fix for RC and where fix needs to happen 2010-11-26, update?

Foundations

  • Unresolved Important Bugs

    • 579850: mount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint - ?

    • 591207:Casper's USB update-initramfs shim should look for initrd.img in /boot - [cjwatson] - .1 attempt failed, will see if possible, ev to look at

    • 607657:Lucid point release installer must support LTS backported Kernels - [cjwatson] - release candiate, on list

    • 635273:Building debs with SWIG libraries do not work - [cjwatson] - under investigation.

  • Resolved

    • 563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot - FIX COMMITTED

Server

  • Unresolved Important Bugs
    • None
  • Resolved
    • None

Desktop

  • Unresolved Important Bugs

    • 525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz - [pitti] - pending finding an OOo maintainer; pretty much "can't fix" until then

    • 625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases - [pitti] - just needs an upload and test, pinged Martin-Eric on the bug

    • 459647:Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled - [pitti] compiz has been going off/on - jeopardizes stability, so may declare permanently broken in lucid.

Kubuntu

  • Kubuntu will update to KDE 4.4.5 (and 4.4.7 for kdepim) for 10.04.2 - [ScottK] KDE 4.4.5 is pending in lucid-proposed, has been marked verification done, so should make it into 1/27 drop with no issues

Stable Release Updates

Quality Assurance

  • Current SRU status

  • Questions:
    • what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure?

    • This report still looks like its being run, can it be updated to reflect the current releases? see: http://people.ubuntu.com/~sbeattie/sru_todo.html

    • is there a report that details the regression run report for the current SRU kernel update? [pedro] took an action to provide this time

    • what has changed in terms of the bug validation over the last week for the current SRU proposed packages?
    • how many packages moved from proposed to updates/security in last week?

Hardware Certification

  • SRU Testing for Lucid and Maverick
  • Current SRU status:
    • overview of schedule and window? Ara's calendar
  • Questions:
    • any adjustment to 2-day time allocated for automated certification run, in planning? (assuming no significant regression)

Kernel

  • Questions:
    • Which bugs that are being targetted for next SRU testing cycle?
    • Which kernels will need SRU testing?
    • What date will the kernel(s) be available for build? test?
    • Any security issues that may impact next cycle?
    • What is the priority list of SRU candidate bugs that will be worked on in next two weeks?

Security

  • Questions:
    • Any show stoppers likely which will cause kernel SRU release cycle to be skipped?
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Foundations

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Server

  • Server tracked bugs

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

ARM

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Desktop

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Ubuntu One

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Kubuntu

  • Questions:
    • Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

Derivatives

Linaro

  • Questions:
    • Any fixes that need to be released in maverick SRU?
    • Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?

OEM

  • Question:
    • Any escalation bugs that need to be worked on in next two weeks that should be SRU?

IRC Meeting Log

ACTIONS

  • marjo, bdmurray: triage lucid and maverick new bug surge over holidays - with focus on 10.04.2 coming up.
  • skaet: broadcast freeze date for 10.04.2
  • skaet: update natty interlock wiki with revised SRU biweekly milestones (testing week, verification week, drop, release to be clarified)

ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2011-01-03-SR (last edited 2011-01-03 17:52:04 by 99-191-111-134)