ReplacementInitDiscussion

Differences between revisions 1 and 4 (spanning 3 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2005-10-06 18:49:39 →
Size: 874
Editor: wbs-146-160-94
Comment: added new spec
← Revision 4 as of 2006-02-08 00:54:51 → ⇥
Size: 1170
Editor: 82-41-27-20
Comment: Note on prcsys/pinit.
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
 * Interested:ScottJamesRemnant  * Interested: ScottJamesRemnant, MartinMeredith
Line 9: Line 9:
 * Branch:  * Branch: UbuntuTrack
Line 32: Line 32:
You may wish to talk with Mandriva people about "[http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2005-10/msg00256.php prcsys/pinit]". It is not as powerful as initng, however, it is not such agdgressive change and it may even go into Dapper and definitely into Dapper+1.

Summary

Discuss replacing the tried, trusted and terrible sysvinit with something a little more flashy such as initng or launchd.

Rationale

Use cases

Scope

Design

Implementation

Code

You may wish to talk with Mandriva people about "[http://archives.mandrivalinux.com/cooker/2005-10/msg00256.php prcsys/pinit]". It is not as powerful as initng, however, it is not such agdgressive change and it may even go into Dapper and definitely into Dapper+1.

Data preservation and migration

Outstanding issues

BoF agenda and discussion

ReplacementInitDiscussion (last edited 2010-05-24 13:24:51 by nat7)