ProcessDocsRevisited
Launchpad Entry: process-docs-revisited
Packages affected:
Summary
This should provide an overview of the issue/functionality/change proposed here. Focus here on what will actually be DONE, summarising that so that other people don't have to read the whole spec.
Release Note
This section should include a paragraph describing the end-user impact of this change. It is meant to be included in the release notes of the first release in which it is implemented. (Not all of these will actually be included in the release notes, at the release manager's discretion; but writing them is a useful exercise.)
It is mandatory.
Rationale
This should cover the _why_: why is this change being proposed, what justifies it, where we see this justified.
Use Cases
Assumptions
Design
You can have subsections that better describe specific parts of the issue.
Implementation
This section should describe a plan of action (the "how") to implement the changes discussed. Could include subsections like:
UI Changes
Should cover changes required to the UI, or specific UI that is required to implement this
Code Changes
Code changes should include an overview of what needs to change, and in some cases even the specific details.
Migration
Include:
- data migration, if any
- redirects from old URLs to new ones, if any
- how users will be pointed to the new way of doing things, if necessary.
Test/Demo Plan
It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during CD testing, and to show off after release.
This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.
Outstanding Issues
This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.
BoF agenda and discussion
Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.
Meeting Notes
- track process decision
- - have a changelog of changes
- referenced from UbuntuDevelopment
- - have a changelog of changes
- make mandatory parts of policies / procedures
- have summaries + links to subpages for larger sections
revive the MOTU Newsletter: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Newsletter?action=recall&rev=6
- re-visit bzr section
- installer subsection
- workflow of teams
- teams in communication section
- debian reference in new packages section, reference to ITPs, RFPs, utnubu, ...
- writeup DebianForUbuntuDevelopers, use ContributingToDebian as basis
- Tracker of proposed process changes
- - process for approval of new processes - ask MOTU-Council to track proposals
Resources
Spec/ProcessDocsRevisited (last edited 2008-08-06 16:22:58 by localhost)