ScottJamesRemnant: obviously some packages are going to be affected

Summary

Rationale

Wireless is one of those features that normal users use everyday. It is also one of the most difficult ones in terms of UI, capturing information, capability of the underlying hardware and drivers. ScottJamesRemnant: not to mention the utter lack of wireless support in the kernel

Use cases

ScottJamesRemnant: explain how this use case is not fulfilled in Ubuntu currently (we have wireless configuration in two places in the UI)

ScottJamesRemnant: this is already available in Ubuntu through NetworkManager

ScottJamesRemnant: NetworkManager is already in Ubuntu, how does this use case extend that to require work?

ScottJamesRemnant: and again, NetworkManager is in Ubuntu

Scope

NetworkManager has come a long way. They are working on NM0.7 with more refined feature set. So our primary work will be to offer improvement ideas. If we find anything that needs urgent attention, we will implement it and fold it back to the NetworkManager ScottJamesRemnant: so this spec is "update NM when the new version comes out?"

Design

These are some ideas to work on at a later time, as needed. For now, we we follow the NetworkManager

Note : KDE lacks NetworkManager because of lack of support for dBUS, which will be available in KDE 4.0. (From Fedora wiki)

ScottJamesRemnant: specs with TODO list are not suitable for review/approval ... please continue drafting and have additional discussion sessions

Implementation

Code

<As Required>

KrishnaSankar and SorenHansen

Data preservation and migration

Outstanding issues

BoF agenda and discussion

Discussion Notes (June 19, 16.00)

POA (Plan of Action)

Questions after the Summit discussion [June 20,2006 4:00 AM]

ScottJamesRemnant: this stuff all needs to go in the real spec


CategorySpec

WirelessClient (last edited 2008-08-06 16:40:06 by localhost)