20110519
Differences between revisions 1 and 31 (spanning 30 versions)
1075
Comment:
|
← Revision 31 as of 2011-07-28 17:58:25 ⇥
12795
Rename page to match team name
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
## page was copied from MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110210 | ## page was renamed from MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110519 ## page was copied from MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110428 ## page was copied from MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110421 |
Line 4: | Line 6: |
'''February 17th, 2011, 15:00 UTC''' in '''#ubuntu-meeting'''.<<BR>> | '''April21th, 2011, 15:00 UTC''' in '''#ubuntu-meeting'''.<<BR>> |
Line 9: | Line 11: |
* [[MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110224]] | * [[MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110505]] |
Line 11: | Line 13: |
* [[MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110310]] | * [[MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110525]] |
Line 16: | Line 18: |
Line 18: | Line 21: |
* http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/ubuntu-armel.html * http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty/ubuntu-armel-natty-alpha-3.html |
* http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html * http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html |
Line 21: | Line 24: |
* Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti) * QA Status (GrueMaster) |
* Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti, ppisati) |
Line 25: | Line 27: |
* QA Status (GrueMaster) | |
Line 30: | Line 33: |
[16:00] <NCommander> #startmeeting [16:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 10:00. The chair is NCommander. [16:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [16:00] <ogra_> moop [16:01] <NCommander> [link] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110519 [16:01] <MootBot> LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110519 [16:01] * NCommander pokes ogra_'s moop [16:01] <ogra_> ouch ! [16:01] <ogra_> dont you touch my moop ! [16:02] <NCommander> [topic] Standing Items [16:02] <MootBot> New Topic: Standing Items [16:02] <NCommander> [link] http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html [16:02] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html [16:02] <NCommander> [link] http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html [16:02] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html [16:02] <NCommander> None of my specs are showing up ... [16:02] * ogra_ isnt done yet with spec writing [16:03] <NCommander> Oh right, it has to be approved, doesn't it [16:03] <NCommander> bah [16:03] <ogra_> NCommander, lets go over them to see if everything is set right (accepted etcd) [16:03] <ogra_> after meeting [16:03] * davidm is happy bp are getting done [16:03] <ogra_> but its good to see the tracker work [16:04] <ogra_> doesnt look like as much hassle for me as last round [16:04] * NCommander likes our '2.0' blueprints for A1 :-) [16:04] <NCommander> Right [16:04] <NCommander> so moving on [16:05] <NCommander> if my web browser didn't force quit ... [16:05] <NCommander> [topic] Unity 2D Status [16:05] <MootBot> New Topic: Unity 2D Status [16:05] <ogra_> use an ac100, its more stable :P [16:05] <ogra_> i think we can drop that [16:05] <ogra_> desktop team takes over now [16:06] <ogra_> i talked to didrocks in budapest [16:06] <davidm> I think it's DX team and desktop team [16:06] <NCommander> cool [16:06] * NCommander brings dead to this standing item [16:06] <ogra_> well, i think upstream is still the same [16:06] <ogra_> not DX afaik [16:06] <NCommander> [topic] Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti) [16:06] <MootBot> New Topic: Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti) [16:06] <ogra_> heh [16:06] <ogra_> NCommander, ppisati [16:06] <rsalveti> :-) [16:07] <ogra_> and we should probably include the linaro platform guys that work on kernel bits in that [16:07] <ogra_> do you have any ? [16:07] <rsalveti> send an SRU for bug 770679 [16:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 770679 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu) "Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/770679 [16:07] <NCommander> rsalveti: won't that require an item respin of natty, no? [16:07] <rsalveti> still waiting for comments [16:07] <rsalveti> NCommander: in theory yes [16:08] <rsalveti> but we can just publish a new kernel file somewhere and update the wiki [16:08] <rsalveti> like we did with maverick [16:08] <ogra_> well, we can alsways provice replacement uInitrd and uImage [16:08] <rsalveti> yeah, that's what we did with maverick [16:08] <ogra_> right [16:08] <rsalveti> but no other update [16:08] <rsalveti> ti-omap4 kernel is kind of the same [16:09] <rsalveti> will be sending another SRU for the drm driver next week [16:09] <ogra_> do you have anyone in your team that should be included in the topic ping ? [16:09] <rsalveti> now that I got that sorted out with linaro kernel [16:09] <rsalveti> ogra_: that depends on what exactly we want to discuss [16:09] <ogra_> same for any other of the standing topics :) [16:09] <rsalveti> sure, we can solve this offline [16:10] <ogra_> yeah [16:10] <rsalveti> that's all for me [16:10] <ogra_> ppisati, everything fine in your world ? [16:11] <rsalveti> NCommander: put an action for you to include ppisati at this topic :-) [16:11] <NCommander> rsalveti: I already edited the wiki [16:11] <ogra_> well, seems he isnt around ... neither is cooloney [16:11] <ogra_> so move :) [16:12] <NCommander> [topic] ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) [16:12] <MootBot> New Topic: ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) [16:12] <ogra_> its horrid [16:12] <NCommander> fpc was bootstrapped on armel but beside that not much to add as the buildds drain [16:12] <ogra_> yeah, will still need a while to lighten up [16:12] * NCommander isn't going to touch it until the build queue is close to empty [16:13] <ogra_> i occasionally go over them and give back what looks like being worth it [16:13] <ppisati> ogra_: let me read... [16:14] * ogra_ wonders where jani is [16:14] <ogra_> still jetlagged from the 100km train ride probably :) [16:14] <GrueMaster> heh [16:14] <NCommander> ogra_: :-P [16:14] <NCommander> can I move on? [16:15] <ogra_> yeah [16:15] <NCommander> [topic] ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) [16:15] <MootBot> New Topic: ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) [16:15] <ogra_> well ... [16:15] <ogra_> waiting for live-build to be implemented for x86 [16:15] <ppisati> ah k :) [16:15] <ogra_> i guess then we have a very small window to make it work for A1 [16:16] <ogra_> the risk is high that we wont make A1 though [16:16] <GrueMaster> Always is. [16:16] <NCommander> Yeah [16:16] <ogra_> in other news i worked the week on preparing everything for the ac100 image [16:16] <NCommander> right now all CD image work is depwait A1, though cjwatson said if we implement stuff in livecd-rootfs, then he'll migrate it to livehelper [16:16] <ogra_> the bits from https://launchpad.net/~ac100/+archive/ppa will land in oneiric next week [16:17] <ogra_> so that we can start rolling images [16:17] <ogra_> look, its a jani :) [16:17] * NCommander throws a pokeball at wild janimo [16:17] <janimo> sorry, forgot what time it was [16:17] <NCommander> :-P [16:17] <ogra_> well, thats all about images atm ... toboin ? [16:18] <ogra_> anything to say about nook ? [16:18] <ogra_> GrueMaster, ^^ [16:18] <GrueMaster> Not yet. Main focus has been on usbboot for panda. [16:18] <ogra_> yeah, thought so [16:18] <ogra_> though you had lots of converation going on about nook images in the channel :) [16:18] <GrueMaster> Although one user has gotten some work towards making it boot natty. [16:18] <ogra_> *conversation [16:19] <NCommander> can I move on? [16:19] <ogra_> go [16:19] <NCommander> [topic] QA Status (GrueMaster) [16:19] <MootBot> New Topic: QA Status (GrueMaster) [16:20] <GrueMaster> Hey, that's me! [16:20] <ogra_> wohoo ! [16:20] <GrueMaster> My focus this week has been gitting panda to boot via usb blob from a host system. [16:20] <ogra_> for automated image testing ;) [16:21] <janimo> GrueMaster, this means no SD card needed at all? [16:21] <ogra_> yeah [16:21] <GrueMaster> This will help a lot for the new buildd deployment, and also help to build an image automation framework. [16:21] <janimo> sweet [16:21] <GrueMaster> No SD card was harmed in the making of thisproduction. [16:21] <ogra_> lol [16:21] <janimo> some SD cards deserve to be harmed though [16:21] <ogra_> hehe [16:22] <GrueMaster> Currently I am hung on getting the usb & network ports initialized. I have a working kernel & initrd. [16:22] <GrueMaster> Reviewing x-loader & u-boot code tosee what they do to enable them. [16:22] <ogra_> i'll get you the initrd bits until monday [16:23] <NCommander> GrueMaster: seems like a lot of it is hte board just isn't happy coming up OTG. could be an issue of whats being iniialized vs what isn't? [16:23] <GrueMaster> I'm using the headless image as a test base. I have the rootfs on a USB drive andam pushing down the kernel with a modified initrd. [16:23] <GrueMaster> Yes. [16:24] <GrueMaster> Not sure if it is the otg port getting in the way,but it shouldn't as they are completely separate circuits. [16:24] <ogra_> NCommander, well, its the decision of putting half the board init code into x-loader and u-boot [16:24] <NCommander> well yes [16:24] <ogra_> if it would live in the kernel as it should, there wouldnt be any probs [16:24] <GrueMaster> btw: u-boot doesn't appear to support usb. [16:24] <ogra_> GrueMaster, rsalveti is working on it [16:25] <GrueMaster> yes, I know. [16:25] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: u-boot supports usb now ;-) [16:25] <ogra_> and martyn told me yesterday that the PXE support patch landed upstream [16:25] <rsalveti> and TFTP [16:25] <GrueMaster> Hopefully we can work together today and get a solution. [16:25] <rsalveti> on my branch [16:25] <GrueMaster> Nice. [16:25] <rsalveti> but I still prefer to jump into the kernel directly [16:25] <ogra_> \o/ [16:25] <ogra_> ++ [16:26] <ogra_> but at least we have something even if that doesnt work [16:26] <rsalveti> anyway, just working with GrueMaster to see what we can get [16:26] <rsalveti> yup :-) [16:26] <GrueMaster> The aboot->kernel method is much cleaner, but what ever it takes to get forward progress is semi-acceptable. [16:26] <ogra_> the good thing is that we could even use it in the images and boot *way* faster [16:26] <rsalveti> let's spend some more time trying to get this to work [16:27] <ogra_> we should inspect that [16:27] <GrueMaster> once I get this working (critical priority), I'll focus on blueprint refinement and nook color. [16:27] <rsalveti> yeah, can add that at my u-boot tftp bp [16:27] <rsalveti> I'll be changing it to "alternatives to boot ubuntu images" [16:27] <rsalveti> something like that [16:27] <rsalveti> omap4boot [16:27] <ogra_> cool ! [16:27] <rsalveti> u-boot with TFTP and PXE [16:27] <rsalveti> and u-boot with fastboot [16:28] <rsalveti> that should cover most of the cases, if not all [16:28] <GrueMaster> That's all from me. Questions? [16:28] <ogra_> not here [16:29] <NCommander> [topic] Specification Status [16:29] <MootBot> New Topic: Specification Status [16:29] <NCommander> probably a good idea to go over this [16:30] <NCommander> I have two spcs drafted, one reviewed, one I mostly completed then handed off, and one that still needs a writeup [16:30] * ogra_ has nothing to report yet ... mine will be ready by monday [16:31] <ogra_> janimo, GrueMaster ? [16:31] <janimo> I have work items more or less written up on my specs [16:31] <janimo> but no other work. Drafting means filling up the wiki template? [16:31] <ogra_> (and anyone else having specs on the team tracker :) ) [16:31] <ogra_> janimo, yeah [16:31] <GrueMaster> I think NCommander has been plastering me with work items. I have been toofocused to check. [16:31] <janimo> team tracker == burndown charts? [16:31] <ogra_> you dont need all topics from the tamplate, only what makes sense in your context [16:32] <ogra_> yeah team tracker == burndown [16:34] <NCommander> [topic] ABO [16:34] <MootBot> New Topic: ABO [16:34] * NCommander has nothing [16:34] <GrueMaster> ABO??? [16:34] <ogra_> ABO ? [16:34] <ogra_> OBA ? [16:34] <NCommander> [topic] AOB [16:34] <MootBot> New Topic: AOB [16:34] <ogra_> BOA ? [16:34] <GrueMaster> BOA? [16:34] * NCommander beats ogra_ [16:34] <ogra_> BAOBAB [16:34] <GrueMaster> BAO? [16:34] <ogra_> BLAH :) [16:34] * ogra_ doesnt have anything for this topic [16:34] <NCommander> I'm guessing we don't [16:35] <NCommander> closiging the meeting in 3 [16:35] <NCommander> 2 [16:35] <NCommander> 1 [16:35] <NCommander> #endmeeting [16:35] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 10:35. |
|
Line 33: | Line 237: |
= Weekly Reports = == Minutes == |
* None |
April21th, 2011, 15:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.
Agenda
Meeting Links
- Link to previous meeting
- Link to next meeting
Action Items from last meeting
- None
Standing Items
http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html
http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html
- Unity 2D Status
- Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti, ppisati)
ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo)
ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander)
QA Status (GrueMaster)
- Any Other Business
Meeting Outcome
[16:00] <NCommander> #startmeeting [16:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 10:00. The chair is NCommander. [16:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [16:00] <ogra_> moop [16:01] <NCommander> [link] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110519 [16:01] <MootBot> LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110519 [16:01] * NCommander pokes ogra_'s moop [16:01] <ogra_> ouch ! [16:01] <ogra_> dont you touch my moop ! [16:02] <NCommander> [topic] Standing Items [16:02] <MootBot> New Topic: Standing Items [16:02] <NCommander> [link] http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html [16:02] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel.html [16:02] <NCommander> [link] http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html [16:02] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/oneiric/ubuntu-armel-oneiric-alpha-1.html [16:02] <NCommander> None of my specs are showing up ... [16:02] * ogra_ isnt done yet with spec writing [16:03] <NCommander> Oh right, it has to be approved, doesn't it [16:03] <NCommander> bah [16:03] <ogra_> NCommander, lets go over them to see if everything is set right (accepted etcd) [16:03] <ogra_> after meeting [16:03] * davidm is happy bp are getting done [16:03] <ogra_> but its good to see the tracker work [16:04] <ogra_> doesnt look like as much hassle for me as last round [16:04] * NCommander likes our '2.0' blueprints for A1 :-) [16:04] <NCommander> Right [16:04] <NCommander> so moving on [16:05] <NCommander> if my web browser didn't force quit ... [16:05] <NCommander> [topic] Unity 2D Status [16:05] <MootBot> New Topic: Unity 2D Status [16:05] <ogra_> use an ac100, its more stable :P [16:05] <ogra_> i think we can drop that [16:05] <ogra_> desktop team takes over now [16:06] <ogra_> i talked to didrocks in budapest [16:06] <davidm> I think it's DX team and desktop team [16:06] <NCommander> cool [16:06] * NCommander brings dead to this standing item [16:06] <ogra_> well, i think upstream is still the same [16:06] <ogra_> not DX afaik [16:06] <NCommander> [topic] Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti) [16:06] <MootBot> New Topic: Kernel Status (cooloney, rsalveti) [16:06] <ogra_> heh [16:06] <ogra_> NCommander, ppisati [16:06] <rsalveti> :-) [16:07] <ogra_> and we should probably include the linaro platform guys that work on kernel bits in that [16:07] <ogra_> do you have any ? [16:07] <rsalveti> send an SRU for bug 770679 [16:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 770679 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu) "Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/770679 [16:07] <NCommander> rsalveti: won't that require an item respin of natty, no? [16:07] <rsalveti> still waiting for comments [16:07] <rsalveti> NCommander: in theory yes [16:08] <rsalveti> but we can just publish a new kernel file somewhere and update the wiki [16:08] <rsalveti> like we did with maverick [16:08] <ogra_> well, we can alsways provice replacement uInitrd and uImage [16:08] <rsalveti> yeah, that's what we did with maverick [16:08] <ogra_> right [16:08] <rsalveti> but no other update [16:08] <rsalveti> ti-omap4 kernel is kind of the same [16:09] <rsalveti> will be sending another SRU for the drm driver next week [16:09] <ogra_> do you have anyone in your team that should be included in the topic ping ? [16:09] <rsalveti> now that I got that sorted out with linaro kernel [16:09] <rsalveti> ogra_: that depends on what exactly we want to discuss [16:09] <ogra_> same for any other of the standing topics :) [16:09] <rsalveti> sure, we can solve this offline [16:10] <ogra_> yeah [16:10] <rsalveti> that's all for me [16:10] <ogra_> ppisati, everything fine in your world ? [16:11] <rsalveti> NCommander: put an action for you to include ppisati at this topic :-) [16:11] <NCommander> rsalveti: I already edited the wiki [16:11] <ogra_> well, seems he isnt around ... neither is cooloney [16:11] <ogra_> so move :) [16:12] <NCommander> [topic] ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) [16:12] <MootBot> New Topic: ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, janimo) [16:12] <ogra_> its horrid [16:12] <NCommander> fpc was bootstrapped on armel but beside that not much to add as the buildds drain [16:12] <ogra_> yeah, will still need a while to lighten up [16:12] * NCommander isn't going to touch it until the build queue is close to empty [16:13] <ogra_> i occasionally go over them and give back what looks like being worth it [16:13] <ppisati> ogra_: let me read... [16:14] * ogra_ wonders where jani is [16:14] <ogra_> still jetlagged from the 100km train ride probably :) [16:14] <GrueMaster> heh [16:14] <NCommander> ogra_: :-P [16:14] <NCommander> can I move on? [16:15] <ogra_> yeah [16:15] <NCommander> [topic] ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) [16:15] <MootBot> New Topic: ARM Image Status (ogra, NCommander) [16:15] <ogra_> well ... [16:15] <ogra_> waiting for live-build to be implemented for x86 [16:15] <ppisati> ah k :) [16:15] <ogra_> i guess then we have a very small window to make it work for A1 [16:16] <ogra_> the risk is high that we wont make A1 though [16:16] <GrueMaster> Always is. [16:16] <NCommander> Yeah [16:16] <ogra_> in other news i worked the week on preparing everything for the ac100 image [16:16] <NCommander> right now all CD image work is depwait A1, though cjwatson said if we implement stuff in livecd-rootfs, then he'll migrate it to livehelper [16:16] <ogra_> the bits from https://launchpad.net/~ac100/+archive/ppa will land in oneiric next week [16:17] <ogra_> so that we can start rolling images [16:17] <ogra_> look, its a jani :) [16:17] * NCommander throws a pokeball at wild janimo [16:17] <janimo> sorry, forgot what time it was [16:17] <NCommander> :-P [16:17] <ogra_> well, thats all about images atm ... toboin ? [16:18] <ogra_> anything to say about nook ? [16:18] <ogra_> GrueMaster, ^^ [16:18] <GrueMaster> Not yet. Main focus has been on usbboot for panda. [16:18] <ogra_> yeah, thought so [16:18] <ogra_> though you had lots of converation going on about nook images in the channel :) [16:18] <GrueMaster> Although one user has gotten some work towards making it boot natty. [16:18] <ogra_> *conversation [16:19] <NCommander> can I move on? [16:19] <ogra_> go [16:19] <NCommander> [topic] QA Status (GrueMaster) [16:19] <MootBot> New Topic: QA Status (GrueMaster) [16:20] <GrueMaster> Hey, that's me! [16:20] <ogra_> wohoo ! [16:20] <GrueMaster> My focus this week has been gitting panda to boot via usb blob from a host system. [16:20] <ogra_> for automated image testing ;) [16:21] <janimo> GrueMaster, this means no SD card needed at all? [16:21] <ogra_> yeah [16:21] <GrueMaster> This will help a lot for the new buildd deployment, and also help to build an image automation framework. [16:21] <janimo> sweet [16:21] <GrueMaster> No SD card was harmed in the making of thisproduction. [16:21] <ogra_> lol [16:21] <janimo> some SD cards deserve to be harmed though [16:21] <ogra_> hehe [16:22] <GrueMaster> Currently I am hung on getting the usb & network ports initialized. I have a working kernel & initrd. [16:22] <GrueMaster> Reviewing x-loader & u-boot code tosee what they do to enable them. [16:22] <ogra_> i'll get you the initrd bits until monday [16:23] <NCommander> GrueMaster: seems like a lot of it is hte board just isn't happy coming up OTG. could be an issue of whats being iniialized vs what isn't? [16:23] <GrueMaster> I'm using the headless image as a test base. I have the rootfs on a USB drive andam pushing down the kernel with a modified initrd. [16:23] <GrueMaster> Yes. [16:24] <GrueMaster> Not sure if it is the otg port getting in the way,but it shouldn't as they are completely separate circuits. [16:24] <ogra_> NCommander, well, its the decision of putting half the board init code into x-loader and u-boot [16:24] <NCommander> well yes [16:24] <ogra_> if it would live in the kernel as it should, there wouldnt be any probs [16:24] <GrueMaster> btw: u-boot doesn't appear to support usb. [16:24] <ogra_> GrueMaster, rsalveti is working on it [16:25] <GrueMaster> yes, I know. [16:25] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: u-boot supports usb now ;-) [16:25] <ogra_> and martyn told me yesterday that the PXE support patch landed upstream [16:25] <rsalveti> and TFTP [16:25] <GrueMaster> Hopefully we can work together today and get a solution. [16:25] <rsalveti> on my branch [16:25] <GrueMaster> Nice. [16:25] <rsalveti> but I still prefer to jump into the kernel directly [16:25] <ogra_> \o/ [16:25] <ogra_> ++ [16:26] <ogra_> but at least we have something even if that doesnt work [16:26] <rsalveti> anyway, just working with GrueMaster to see what we can get [16:26] <rsalveti> yup :-) [16:26] <GrueMaster> The aboot->kernel method is much cleaner, but what ever it takes to get forward progress is semi-acceptable. [16:26] <ogra_> the good thing is that we could even use it in the images and boot *way* faster [16:26] <rsalveti> let's spend some more time trying to get this to work [16:27] <ogra_> we should inspect that [16:27] <GrueMaster> once I get this working (critical priority), I'll focus on blueprint refinement and nook color. [16:27] <rsalveti> yeah, can add that at my u-boot tftp bp [16:27] <rsalveti> I'll be changing it to "alternatives to boot ubuntu images" [16:27] <rsalveti> something like that [16:27] <rsalveti> omap4boot [16:27] <ogra_> cool ! [16:27] <rsalveti> u-boot with TFTP and PXE [16:27] <rsalveti> and u-boot with fastboot [16:28] <rsalveti> that should cover most of the cases, if not all [16:28] <GrueMaster> That's all from me. Questions? [16:28] <ogra_> not here [16:29] <NCommander> [topic] Specification Status [16:29] <MootBot> New Topic: Specification Status [16:29] <NCommander> probably a good idea to go over this [16:30] <NCommander> I have two spcs drafted, one reviewed, one I mostly completed then handed off, and one that still needs a writeup [16:30] * ogra_ has nothing to report yet ... mine will be ready by monday [16:31] <ogra_> janimo, GrueMaster ? [16:31] <janimo> I have work items more or less written up on my specs [16:31] <janimo> but no other work. Drafting means filling up the wiki template? [16:31] <ogra_> (and anyone else having specs on the team tracker :) ) [16:31] <ogra_> janimo, yeah [16:31] <GrueMaster> I think NCommander has been plastering me with work items. I have been toofocused to check. [16:31] <janimo> team tracker == burndown charts? [16:31] <ogra_> you dont need all topics from the tamplate, only what makes sense in your context [16:32] <ogra_> yeah team tracker == burndown [16:34] <NCommander> [topic] ABO [16:34] <MootBot> New Topic: ABO [16:34] * NCommander has nothing [16:34] <GrueMaster> ABO??? [16:34] <ogra_> ABO ? [16:34] <ogra_> OBA ? [16:34] <NCommander> [topic] AOB [16:34] <MootBot> New Topic: AOB [16:34] <ogra_> BOA ? [16:34] <GrueMaster> BOA? [16:34] * NCommander beats ogra_ [16:34] <ogra_> BAOBAB [16:34] <GrueMaster> BAO? [16:34] <ogra_> BLAH :) [16:34] * ogra_ doesnt have anything for this topic [16:34] <NCommander> I'm guessing we don't [16:35] <NCommander> closiging the meeting in 3 [16:35] <NCommander> 2 [16:35] <NCommander> 1 [16:35] <NCommander> #endmeeting [16:35] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 10:35.
Action Items
- None
ARM/Meeting/2011/20110519 (last edited 2011-07-28 17:58:25 by pool-96-226-234-14)