|
Sunday, May 3rd, 2009, 7:00pm (1900) PDT
Summary
- Release Party Wrap-up
Photos: Nathan Haines' photo from the SoCal party; Santa Monica party photo
- Still looking for photos from Walnut Creek party
Writeups: San Francisco party, Walnut Creek party
- OSCON
Thread about description of us for the registration form: April, May
Discussion about putting stuff about Ubuntu vs. Ubuntu California vs. OSCON activities in description, consensus was that we should talk about Ubuntu, maybe mention the LoCo, and link to the Ubuntu website
- Further discussion moved to mailing list
- Jaunty Installfests
- Since we don't have the resources to do one ourselves (especially in North California), we're going to look into attending LUG installfests with CDs and support materials instead
- Discussion about splitting up mailing list
- Discussion about making an -announce list or -chat list to separate announcements (low-volume) and discussion (high-volume?)
LoCoFAQ says we should stick with one list
- List currently isn't high-volume enough to consider it
- Maybe standardize formatting of announcement emails so people can filter them with procmail
- identi.ca and Twitter feeds focus on announcements, for people who want that
Original Agenda
- Release Party Wrap-up
- OSCON
SoCal Install Fest
Logs
19:11:54 < Yasumoto> Welcome to the Ubuntu California meeting for May 3rd, 2009 19:12:00 < Yasumoto> Our agenda for tonight is: 19:12:12 < Yasumoto> 1. Release Party Wrap-up 19:12:16 < Yasumoto> 2. OSCON 19:12:24 < Yasumoto> 3. Southern California Install Fest 19:12:36 < Yasumoto> anyone have anything they'd like to add or mention before we get started? 19:12:38 * indigo747 raises his hand, hoping it's not too late 19:12:47 < Yasumoto> welcome indigo747 19:12:55 < nhaines> indigo747: welcome to the meeting! 19:13:04 < Grantbow> indigo747: welcome 19:13:09 < indigo747> thank you 19:13:17 < Yasumoto> alright, so let's start with the release party 19:13:44 < Yasumoto> http://www.flickr.com/photos/nathanhaines/3478110439/ 19:14:11 < Yasumoto> That's the one from SoCal, if anyone has any other pictures please post them 19:15:09 < rww> Grantbow: who has photos from the WC party? A couple of other people were taking photos, so I didn't take any. 19:15:29 < Grantbow> I haven't gotten in touch with the photographer yet 19:15:36 < Grantbow> the one I have is blurred and not useful 19:15:47 < Grantbow> I don't think we have any from SF, it was way too dark 19:16:10 < Yasumoto> Grantbow: from all accounts, that one was pretty epic though, right 19:16:12 < Yasumoto> *? 19:16:20 < Grantbow> yes, full detailed summary on the mail list 19:16:26 < Grantbow> I'm slow with the WC summary 19:16:32 < Grantbow> it's coming to the mail list soon 19:17:37 < Yasumoto> no worries, sounds good 19:17:51 < Yasumoto> So any comments about the different events we had in terms of organization or promotion? 19:18:29 < Grantbow> I think I'm the only one that got to all three. Each were different but I think they were all very successful! 19:18:44 < Grantbow> well, four including Felton yesterday 19:18:51 < nhaines> I liked the Lake Forest event because it took the least amount of effort. 19:19:12 < Yasumoto> nhaines: bah.. 19:19:45 < Grantbow> I didn't hear much about the Santa Monica event 19:20:22 < Grantbow> oh, they took a group picture, excellent 19:21:04 < nhaines> Grantbow: link? 19:21:44 < Grantbow> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Projects/JauntyRelease links to it 19:22:30 < rww> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3478/3469549812_1dd45e0699_o.jpg 19:22:59 < Grantbow> rww: thanks 19:23:23 < Yasumoto> cool 19:23:31 < Yasumoto> for further discussion, I 19:23:38 < Yasumoto> *I'll point you to the mailing list 19:23:47 < Yasumoto> any more comments? 19:25:10 < Yasumoto> Alrighty, moving on to OSCON discussion 19:25:46 < Yasumoto> So we're currently in the process of registering, and we need to get a logo, a 50-word description, and a homepage link 19:26:43 < Yasumoto> I'll point you guys to this thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-ca/2009-April/000542.html 19:27:03 < Grantbow> unfortunately the discussion spans both months of archives 19:27:17 < Yasumoto> yeah 19:27:33 < Grantbow> no biggie 19:27:34 < rww> The May part of it starts at https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-ca/2009-May/000550.html 19:27:44 < Yasumoto> I'm essentially torn between choosing a description about "Ubuntu" vs. one for "Ubuntu California" 19:28:36 < Flannel> Yasumoto: whys that? 19:28:40 < Grantbow> since we have three things (logo, link and description) to provide each can be pointed where we think is best 19:28:47 < Flannel> Yasumoto: Or rather, What's wrong with Ubuntu? 19:29:04 < Yasumoto> Flannel: it seems that most of the description on the OSCON site are about the distro/company as a whole 19:29:30 < Yasumoto> but since we're a LoCo team, I think it'd be good to talk about what LoCos do and why it's cool, rather than rehashing what Ubuntu is 19:29:37 < Yasumoto> (what most people probably already know) 19:30:03 < Grantbow> people in this case is Oscon attendees, right? 19:30:14 < Grantbow> s/is/ar/ 19:30:18 < Grantbow> s/is/are/ 19:30:22 < Yasumoto> Grantbow: yes, good clarification 19:30:24 < Flannel> Well, We're there promoting Ubuntu. Can we not be an Ubuntu booth, and then include the LoCo team in the description or something? 19:31:50 < Yasumoto> that was my initial idea, to somehow discuss a bit of both 19:32:21 < Yasumoto> but rww and Grantbow both had some good takes on the description that really played on the community aspects of LoCos, which would be a good way to represent the team 19:32:53 < Grantbow> Canonical's planned presence is also an unknown variable 19:33:12 < Grantbow> though Jono is organizing that Summit just before Oscon and will I'm sure be there. 19:33:20 < nhaines> I feel it's usually better to talk about Ubuntu. We'll all have LoCo name badges. 19:33:38 < Yasumoto> Grantbow: now that I think about it, their booth at SCaLE was actually called Canonical 19:33:48 < Yasumoto> so I think we'll be alright for the "Ubuntu" namespace 19:33:54 < Flannel> Yeah. Canonical won't be there for "Ubuntu" they'll be there for "Canonical" 19:33:56 < Grantbow> Yasumoto: interesting 19:34:08 < Flannel> We have a monopoly on an "Ubuntu" Booth 19:34:20 < Flannel> (we being the community) 19:34:23 < rww> In which case, we'd want to link to http://www.ubuntu.com/ rather than CaliforniaTeam 19:34:42 < Yasumoto> yeah, I think we should stick to linking to ubuntu.com 19:34:50 < Grantbow> rww: +1 it's designed for that type of viewer 19:36:24 < Yasumoto> so for the link, I say www.ubuntu.com 19:36:32 < Flannel> But mentioning the LoCo would be good, so people know they can come check us out for purposes other than Ubuntu information. 19:36:49 < Yasumoto> Flannel++ 19:36:49 < Flannel> but the bulk of it ought to be regarding Ubuntu proper. 19:37:01 < Yasumoto> other thoughts? 19:38:29 < nhaines> Heya, scunizi. Welcome to the meeting! :) 19:38:38 < scunizi> thanks..! 19:38:49 < rww> Okays, let's do some more hashing out of the summary on the mailing list, then? 19:38:57 < Yasumoto> rww: sounds like a plan :) 19:39:18 < Yasumoto> Last topic is Installfest 19:40:06 < Yasumoto> The plan is to set up one up in Southern California (probably Orange County) 19:40:13 < Yasumoto> anyone want to set one up anywhere else? 19:41:01 < Grantbow> There are a few near the San Francisco area that I'll be attending and providing discs for. 19:41:13 < Yasumoto> Grantbow: awesome 19:41:27 < Yasumoto> what about trying to tie in the installfest with an OCLUG meeting? 19:41:32 < rww> Grantbow: can you send details of that to the mailing list? You're much better at finding things like that than me :) 19:41:39 < Grantbow> rww: sure 19:43:53 < Yasumoto> Yasumoto: alright, sounds like we'll move it to the list 19:44:37 < rww> Yasumoto: yeah. I don't think we have the resources to make our own NorCal one, so I'm thinking it'd be better to have a presence at the various LUG installfests instead. 19:44:50 < Yasumoto> rww: yeah, that sounds like a good call 19:45:21 < Yasumoto> rww: I think that may be a good idea for down here too 19:45:55 < Yasumoto> Alright guys, any other questions/comments/concerns? 19:46:43 * rww just thought of something 19:47:14 < Yasumoto> rww: go for it :) 19:48:17 < rww> I've noticed that the mailing list has been getting more posts recently. At some point, we're going to need to split it so that people who want announcements about what we're doing aren't inundated with (e.g.) multiple posts about wording for conference paragraphs. I think this has come up (and been rejected) before, but it's something that I feel will happen eventually, and that we should keep in mind. 19:48:35 * rww steps down from soapbox 19:49:09 < Grantbow> The other night I found some discussion about this on a LoCo focused wiki page. 19:49:14 * Grantbow looks for the link 19:49:24 < Yasumoto> mm, that's actually a pretty interesting point 19:49:41 < Flannel> I think we'll be fine without an -announce for a bit longer 19:49:52 < Grantbow> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoFAQ at the bottom 19:50:36 < Yasumoto> mm.. I see 19:51:25 < Flannel> A dozen posts surrounding an announcement isn't going to drown them out. 19:52:40 < Yasumoto> fair point 19:53:49 < rww> Flannel: but it is going to dissuade people who just want to attend events, rather than plan them, from joining the list 19:54:20 < rww> definitely a question that has two sides... and if LoCo policy leans one way, I guess that's the way we should go :) 19:55:05 < Grantbow> The LoCoFAQ implies the scope of the list to be discussion, not just announcements 19:55:07 < Flannel> rww: A dozen posts a week isn't high volume 19:55:25 < Yasumoto> LKML ftw :-X 19:56:06 < Flannel> rww: If we think there's an issue, we try and set up some standardized format for announce emails so you can procmail them or something. 19:57:03 < Flannel> rww: Is anyone going to want to attend LoCo events and not want to discuss them anyway? I'm not sure how wide of an audience that is. 19:57:09 < Grantbow> nhaines: what do you think? 19:57:21 < Flannel> or at least, "not want to" to the point that the discussion is prohibitive 19:58:45 < Grantbow> If there are other comments can we direct people to the list? 19:58:52 < Grantbow> lol 19:59:17 < Flannel> Yeah, this is something we can take to the list. Let people who don't wnat to discuss chime in (since theywouldn't be at the meetings anyway) 19:59:20 < nhaines> I think we don't need a separate list at the moment. 19:59:24 < Flannel> and then see if we need to find a solution. 19:59:54 < Yasumoto> alright, well I say we'll call this adjourned 20:00:05 < Flannel> Actually, isn't our twitter feed fitting that bill nicely? 20:00:06 < Grantbow> good timing 20:00:07 < Yasumoto> thanks for coming everyone, we'll see you in two weeks 20:00:08 < Yasumoto> :) 20:00:13 < Yasumoto> Grantbow: I do what I can 20:00:42 < Flannel> Our twitter doohickey is currently only for announcements (except during activities) 20:00:44 < Grantbow> Flannel: I wish we could have posted something about this meeting to the identi.ca/twitter feed 20:00:53 < rww> Grantbow: it was on identi.ca 20:01:02 < rww> (I love the identi.ca/twitter feeds, btw. Forgot about those.) 20:01:06 < Grantbow> did it not forward? 20:01:11 * Grantbow double checks 20:01:31 < rww> Grantbow: it was right before the meeting started, you might have missed it 20:01:35 < Flannel> It's a bit tardy. 20:01:42 < Flannel> We'll have to work on that. 20:01:57 < Flannel> Maybe I'll have to figure out how you kids do stuff, in order to keep it up to date. 20:02:24 < Grantbow> twitter.com has been having issues lately 20:03:03 < Grantbow> I see it on the website but it didn't pass through the sms 20:03:37 < Grantbow> thanks everyone for coming 20:03:56 < Flannel> Open source to the rescue? 20:04:34 < Grantbow> if only the followers were on identi.ca too 20:07:00 < Grantbow> followers/subscribers