DiskMonitoring
Problem
From the original mail to ubuntu-devel:
- IDE disks die, a lot.
- Sometimes they start getting read errors before they die completely.(a long while later they will die)
- Joe User probably doesn't have backups.
Relevent threads on ubuntu-devel:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-February/004912.html
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-March/004996.html
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-March/005972.html
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-March/006326.html
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-April/006610.html
Solution Proposal
It appears as if S.M.A.R.T. is a reasonable solution and gives two opportunities:
- Non-interactive monitoring: Monitor the drive and notify the user when there is a problem.
- Interactive checking: Respond to a user query about drive health.
Non-interactive monitoring
Objective
Notify the user graphically when SMART detects a problem. This should be set up without user intervention on standard installs.
Proposed Method
The creation of a new package 'smart-notifier' which displays the output of the smartmontools package to the user. This package will work by:
- Installing a notifier script which is triggered by smartmontools
- The notifier script sends a message (probably via dbus or the filesystem) to a per-user-login-session daemon
- This daemon then presents a graphical warning to the user
Completed Work
A prototype package is available at http://www.pakistanopensource.org/projects/cassandra/ along with a modified smartmontools package
- The modifications to smartmontools have been discussed and refined with the Debian maintainer and are probably pending after sarge
Sponsorship of the smart-notifier package for Debian has been discussed with ToddTroxell
Future Work
Implementing the extensions discussed in http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/SMARTMonitoring either need to be implemented within smartd or will require a design radically more complex than the prototype. There should be some discussion about this.
- Prototype code must be re-implemented using test driven development. (hooray for python doctests)
- Implement spooling to store warnings if the user is offline (no good ideas how yet).
- Security review of dbus configuration (involves communication between a root and user process)
- KDE/Qt interface
- I18N
- Integrate into the default gnome/kde session (per-user-session daemon)
- UI review + changes (GNOME HIG)
Interactive checking
A GUI app that uses smartctl as a backend, discussed in http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/SMARTMonitoring but probably simpler so that mere mortals can understand the GUI.
Issues with http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/SMARTMonitoring
- Providing histroical data will probably mean the implementation of a daemon or will need to be implemented within smartd.
- What are the advantages of "Captive" mode tests if exactly the same tests can be run in "non-captive" mode? The GUI will be simpler and there will be no need for checking which patitions are mounted.
Perhaps this can be done in the same package as the non-interactive monitoring.
From ToddTroxell Wed Mar 2 22:48:12 +0000 2005 From: Todd Troxell Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:48:12 +0000 Subject: thoughts Message-ID: <20050302224812+0000@www.ubuntulinux.org>
I think the biggest question is: do we want some generic "system alerts" applet/mechanism type of deal with a well defined way for applications to send alerts, or just a SMART error reporter? The simplest/easiest middle-ground is something that simply watches logs and reports on a list of pre-known regexes.
From ToddTroxell Wed Mar 2 22:59:45 +0000 2005 From: Todd Troxell Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:59:45 +0000 Subject: more thoughts Message-ID: <20050302225945+0000@https://www.ubuntulinux.org>
perhaps instead of log monitoring, we could use the -exec option in smartd.conf and make DBUS calls!
DiskMonitoring (last edited 2010-10-18 23:56:07 by mail)