20070529
Logs
TZ UTC+1
05:01 BenC Ok, everyone here? 05:01 pkl_ yes 05:01 zul yep 05:01 BenC Anyone who wants to follow along, agenda is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting although we only loosely follow it 05:02 BenC This meeting, I wanted to start off with the team catching each other up on what we're doing 05:03 BenC Kyle just reminded me that rtg (Tim) probably is on vacation 05:03 pkl_ on a raft in Montana somewhere... 05:03 BenC I'll start. but I'm pretty basic. Been merging patches from feisty into gutsy kernel, and sending those patches upstream. Working on a -6.12 upload right now 05:04 BenC Today I'll start merging some more patches, some of the bigger ones like toshiba_acpi 05:04 BenC I may end up doing that in linux-ubuntu-modules instead, and disable the one in the kernel 05:05 BenC kylem: how you been doing? 05:06 kylem i haven't really done anything kernel related in the las tweek. 05:06 kylem getting intel X support up to snuff for gutsy and then back for feisyt. 05:07 BenC mobile stuff? 05:08 kylem BenC_, no. 05:08 BenC_ Ok, we can catch up on the other stuff later then 05:08 BenC_ pkl_: how's things with you? 05:10 pkl_ I've been following post-feisty kernel upload bugs and emails. Going to start a new release, and integrate the current crop of patches to be put in. 05:10 BenC pkl_: did you discover what caused the storage bug? 05:10 cr3 kylem: I noticed important changes to the intel X driver in gutsy such as support for rotation 05:10 pkl_ In addition, done a bit of work on the mobile stuff, mainly Unionfs 2.0 status, and ODF (On disk format) investigation 05:11 pkl_ Will be falling back to looking at Squashfs instrumentation to investigate the liveCD slowdown soon. 05:12 pkl_ What storage bug BTW? There's lots of the upload broke booting, fstab, resume etc. All down to the reversion of libata support for PATA. 05:12 BenC I don't think it's really a bug, but some people noticed hdX changing to sdX 05:13 BenC I think they had hardcoded stuff in fstab, not using UUID's 05:13 BenC or maybe it was sdX to hdX 05:13 pkl_ Most seem to have noticed sdX changing to hdX... All the breakage seems to have been caused by hardcoding devices in various files. 05:14 BenC one other common non-bug I noticed was people complaining we "broke" their locally compiled modules, so I'm suggesting to Kees to update the security notices on ABI bump kernels to include a note saying "ABI changes, recompile your locally compiled modules" 05:15 BenC pkl_: any real regressions come out of that? 05:16 pkl_ Couple of people complaining that the ps/2 fix doesn't fix VIA chipsets. Some VIA chipsets seem to be exhibiting the same problems as SiS chipsets, but the fix doesn't work and so the underlying cause is obviously different. What the cause is however is not apparent. 05:16 BenC pkl_: Are the VIA chipsets a regression from edgy still? 05:18 pkl_ I've not any regressions so far... There's been some complaints that some -16.28 packages have been missing, or dependencies still based on -15.27... 05:18 mdz pkl_: what's the status of the mobile kernel flavour? 05:18 mdz pkl_: did you receive the config from intel? 05:18 BenC pkl_: We can discuss this more on kernel-team@ if you need some help with these bugs...sounds like overall there weren't any major issues with -16 vs. -15 05:19 pkl_ The VIA chipsets are a regression from edgy, in addition mice on VirtualPC are still broken. 05:19 pkl_ mdz: I've received nothing from Intel. 05:19 BenC Ok, I remember the VirtualPC one being the initial test case...I couldn't get VirtualPC working though 05:19 BenC mdz: Re: Intel-Mobile stuff, we haven't gotten a single bit from them, that I know of 05:20 BenC mdz: Should Phillip post to ubuntu-mobile requesting updates on kernel side? 05:21 mdz BenC: he should contact rob rhoads directly 05:21 BenC Ok 05:21 mdz and then mail ubuntu-mobile to let folks know what's happening, once there's something to tell 05:23 BenC Noted, thanks 05:23 BenC I want to skip ahead to KVM/cr3 topic... 05:24 cr3 ahoy, the KVM has been connected to each desktop in the hardware certification lab 05:24 cr3 to access the hardware certification network, I have decided to configure a VPN with dynamic addressing so that multiple can connect at the same time 05:25 BenC What software do we use to access it? 05:25 cr3 to access the machines, there is a Java client which enables the user to select the machine 05:26 cr3 to poweron the machines, the machines are connected to PDUs which can manage the power to the machines 05:26 cr3 the BIOS of the machines are all configured to poweron when power is detected on the power supply 05:26 cr3 this is necessary because the machines are still located in an office which becomes prohibitively hot when the machines are all turned on 05:27 BenC So we should power them down when we aren't using them? 05:27 cr3 to address this problem, I will be sending quotes for colocation centers this afternoon which should be approved in a matter of a week or two 05:27 cr3 BenC: ideally, yes 05:28 cr3 the process of configuring the VPN and using the client software should be straightforward, the problem is mostly having to deal with the PDUs which I would like to spare for you guys 05:28 BenC Is there a howto page where we can go on how to configure the vpn and client? 05:28 cr3 so, I see a couple options: 1. until we get a colocation center, the distro team could ping me to poweron machines; 2. I could provide detailed instructions on managing the PDUs sometime this week. 05:28 BenC I have to be honest, it's been years since I used a VPN on Linux 05:29 cr3 BenC: not yet, but it's on my TODO list. when would you like the instructions, just for the VPN and client to start with? 05:30 BenC yeah, just being able to test this setup would be a good first step 05:31 cr3 BenC: sure, I could aim to provide these instructions sometime tomorrow and how should I inform the distro team about it? 05:31 BenC Any chance the machines could have a CDRW media inserted in them constantly so we can do "burn ISO, reboot to livecd, install, reboot to new system" tests? 05:32 BenC cr3: I can give you an email address to send it to 05:32 cr3 BenC: about half the machines don't even have a CDROM device because I often receive bare motherboards from Intel 05:32 BenC cr3: Ah, right...is there a PXE boot server? 05:33 cr3 BenC: yes, and I would like to spend the next couple weeks improving the usability of the PXE boot server which I call a certification appliance 05:33 cr3 the reason for this naming is that I would eventually like it to become a reusable component, for people like Intel for example 05:34 BenC cool 05:34 cr3 mvo has also expressed interest in running a certification appliance, just for the automatic building process 05:35 cr3 so, we could schedule discussing the certification appliance at the next kernel meeting in a couple weeks 05:35 BenC Sounds good...thanks for your time cr3 05:35 cr3 BenC: does that seem like a reasonable timeline for you? 05:35 BenC yes, right after Tribe 1 is when we'll probably want to start using it 05:36 BenC that's when our bug level increases from more exposure 05:36 cr3 IOU: 1. VPN and KVM client instructions tomorrow; 2. certification appliance on June 12th. 05:36 cr3 we should also consider discussing the status of colocation at the next meeting 05:36 BenC Ok, noted for next agenda 05:36 cr3 thanks! 05:37 BenC have a good week cr3, and thanks again 05:37 BenC Alright, moving on to Tribe 1 preparation 05:38 BenC 2.6.22-rc3, aka Ubuntu-2.6.22-6.12, was uploaded this morning, but I have a ppc build failure to contend with 05:39 BenC I'll have that done by today, and do lum/lrm/meta behind it, so hopefully by the end of tomorrow, things will be stable 05:40 BenC that will give us only 8 days till tribe 1, so this is most likely the kernel that will be in that milestone 05:40 BenC fyi, Tribe is scheduled for June 7th 05:40 BenC *1 05:41 BenC I'm not aware of any showstoppers for this, but anyone have any known issues we should be worrying about? 05:43 BenC Eerie silence :) 05:43 pkl_ well assumed silence meant no from me :) 05:44 BenC You guys running gutsy kernel yet? 05:44 kylem yeah. 05:44 kylem on all my machines. 05:44 BenC nice 05:45 pkl_ no, I've been running the test Feisty kernel. Now it's released, I could move to gutsy... 05:46 BenC pkl_: you gotten a xeon mobo yet? 05:46 BenC probably good if you could keep feisty on at least one machine 05:46 BenC even if it's dual-boot 05:47 pkl_ BenC: not yet (xeon mobo). 05:47 BenC well, I think that's it for us...any topics anyone wants to bring up before we cut out? 05:49 BenC Excellent, thanks for coming everyone, and have a good week...thanks to pkl and rtg (absent) for their first security uploads this past week
MeetingLogs/Kernel/20070529 (last edited 2008-08-06 16:16:34 by localhost)