20080917
Revision 1 as of 2008-09-18 06:37:45
Clear message
Agenda - 2008-09-17
Automated bug replies - A recent thread regarding the kernel's automated call for testing has raised some concerns. For future reference, I'd like to discuss if we should establish a set of guidelines these types of automated posts should follow? For example, should it be clearly stated this is an automated response, what the odds of a response to the automated reply being seen by a real person, etc.
Getting QATeam/ReleaseReports in shape for the next release meeting - heno.
Testing day preparations
- Volunteers to be on hand
- Tidying up the test documentation - what should we prioritise before the even and what is suitable for editing during it?
Triage of potential regression bugs
Meeting Log: MeetingLogs/QATeam/20080917