2010-12-06-SR
8660
Comment:
|
10140
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 68: | Line 68: |
* Bug:563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot * Bug:591207:Casper's USB update-initramfs shim should look for initrd.img in /boot * Bug:607657:Lucid point release installer must support LTS backported Kernels * Bug:635273:Building debs with SWIG libraries do not work |
* Bug:563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot - ''[cjwatson] - release candiate, on list'' * Bug:591207:Casper's USB update-initramfs shim should look for initrd.img in /boot - ''[cjwatson] - .1 attempt failed, will see if possible, ev to look at'' * Bug:607657:Lucid point release installer must support LTS backported Kernels - ''[cjwatson] - release candiate, on list'' * Bug:635273:Building debs with SWIG libraries do not work - ''[cjwatson] - under investigation.'' |
Line 76: | Line 76: |
* Bug:671103:backport grub-legacy-ec2 from maverick to lucid | * Bug:671103:backport grub-legacy-ec2 from maverick to lucid - ''[cjwatson] - accepted for validation already - will go out as SRU '' |
Line 81: | Line 81: |
* Bug:525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz * Bug:625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases * Bug:459647:Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled |
* Bug:525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz - ''[pitti] - pending finding an OOo maintainer'' * Bug:625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases - ''[pitti] - will investigate '' * Bug:459647:Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled - ''[pitti] compiz has been going off/on - jeopardizes stability, so may declare permanently broken in lucid.'' |
Line 99: | Line 99: |
Notes: * ''[cjwatson] sponsored 671097 and milestoned this for server team'' * ''[cjwatwon] bug 554172, don't know a good fix. Need discussion on solutions, see action items'' * ''[victorp] certification testing for lucid done on ubuntu for netbooks, desktop edition (laptops and pc) sevrers, i386 and amd64) testing link: http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html'' * ''[skaet] decision to ship lucid SRU update without regression testing formalized, some concern on it not baking for a week - reverts not reseting -proposed is the concern'' * ''[skaet] shipping maverick SRU will be decided after we get result of SRU testing - action taken to call meeting to discuss tomorrow'' |
|
Line 103: | Line 109: |
* what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure? | * what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure? |
Line 111: | Line 117: |
''[pedro] will take an action to provide next time '' | |
Line 120: | Line 127: |
* is there a report that illustrates the results of the last cerification run? ( is http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html still in use ) | * is there a report that illustrates the results of the last cerification run? ( is http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html still in use ) - ''[victorp] -- see http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html, was request to add architectures, and extend to releases '' |
Line 152: | Line 160: |
* Should this link be updated? : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/StableReleaseTracker * Is this the official one? : http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html |
* Should this link be updated? : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/StableReleaseTracker -- ''[[zul] - this is obsolete'' * Is this the official one? : http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html -- ''[zul] - this is the one to use'' |
Line 201: | Line 209: |
* cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555 * victorp, look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting * pedro, marjo - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting. * victorp, pedro, bjf, skaet to set date for next target SRU release. We'll be skipping Dec. 2. * skaet, victorp, bjf, pitti - meet to discuss SRU release of maverick post hardware cert testing results. |
* [cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul] - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555 * [victorp] look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting * [pedro, marjo] - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting. * [victorp, pedro, bjf, skaet] to set date for next target SRU release. We'll be skipping Dec. 2. * [skaet, victorp, bjf, pitti] - meet to discuss SRU release of maverick post hardware cert testing results |
Stable Release Team Agenda
PURPOSE: collaborate on stable release updates and long term support point releases
FREQUENCY: bi-weekly meeting
ACTIVE RELEASES: Maverick, Lucid, Karmic, Hardy, Dapper
RELEASE LIFECYCLE STATUS: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
Actions from Last Meeting
none (first meeting after all )
Features and Bugs Summary
- Release-targeted bugs (snapshot 2010/11/17)
Release |
Bugs Open |
Critical |
High |
New |
Maverick |
55 |
66 |
||
Lucid |
113 |
161 |
||
Karmic |
3 |
39 |
115 |
|
Hardy |
0 |
65 |
180 |
|
Dapper |
1 |
14 |
67 |
- Update targetted bugs
maverick-update : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?&field.milestone:list=27564
lucid-update : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?&field.milestone:list=21448
karmic-update : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?&field.milestone:list=12716
hardy-update : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?&field.milestone:list=34695
- note: hardy-updates didn't exist until 11/17 so not accurate at this point - needs a scrub.
dapper-update : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?&field.milestone:list=135
- Known regressions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+bugs?field.tag=regression-potential
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+bugs?field.tag=regression-potential
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.tag=regression-potential
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+bugs?field.tag=regression-potential
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/+bugs?field.tag=regression-potential
- Nominated bugs
10.04.2 Long Term Support Status
Planned Release Date: February 17, 2011
- Related Blueprints
- None
- Milestoned Bug Summary
Kernel
- Unresolved Important Bugs
635344:After my CD-Rom is ejected, the tray will instantly retract. [sconklin] - need to determine if can come up with fix for RC and where fix needs to happen
Foundations
- Unresolved Important Bugs
563916:[details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot - [cjwatson] - release candiate, on list
591207:Casper's USB update-initramfs shim should look for initrd.img in /boot - [cjwatson] - .1 attempt failed, will see if possible, ev to look at
607657:Lucid point release installer must support LTS backported Kernels - [cjwatson] - release candiate, on list
635273:Building debs with SWIG libraries do not work - [cjwatson] - under investigation.
Server
- Unresolved Important Bugs
671103:backport grub-legacy-ec2 from maverick to lucid - [cjwatson] - accepted for validation already - will go out as SRU
Desktop
- Unresolved Important Bugs
525807:[upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz - [pitti] - pending finding an OOo maintainer
625280:SRU: xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.9-1 to Lucid and older supported releases - [pitti] - will investigate
459647:Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled - [pitti] compiz has been going off/on - jeopardizes stability, so may declare permanently broken in lucid.
Kubuntu
[ScottK via IRC on ubuntu-devel 11/22] - Tech board has approved putting KDE point releases into -updates. Kubuntu will update to KDE 4.4.5 (and 4.4.7 for kdepim) for 10.04.2
Stable Release Updates
Existing Process Documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
Existing Kernel SRU Process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelUpdates
New Kernel SRU Process being piloted: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence
Overall SRU Status: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
Notes:
[cjwatson] sponsored 671097 and milestoned this for server team
[cjwatwon] bug 554172, don't know a good fix. Need discussion on solutions, see action items
[victorp] certification testing for lucid done on ubuntu for netbooks, desktop edition (laptops and pc) sevrers, i386 and amd64) testing link: http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html
[skaet] decision to ship lucid SRU update without regression testing formalized, some concern on it not baking for a week - reverts not reseting -proposed is the concern
[skaet] shipping maverick SRU will be decided after we get result of SRU testing - action taken to call meeting to discuss tomorrow
Quality Assurance
- what is the status of the regression automation infrastructure?
- Current SRU status:
- Questions:
This report still looks like its being run, can it be updated to reflect the current releases? see: http://people.ubuntu.com/~sbeattie/sru_todo.html
- is there a report that details the regression run report for the current SRU kernel update?
[pedro] will take an action to provide next time
- what has changed in terms of the bug validation over the last week for the current SRU proposed packages?
- how many packages moved from proposed to updates/security in last week?
Hardware Certification
- what is the status of the hardware certification infrastructure automation?
- Current SRU status:
is there a report that illustrates the results of the last cerification run? ( is http://people.canonical.com/~fader/hw-testing/current.html still in use ) - [victorp] --
see http://people.canonical.com/~cr3/hw-testing/lucid-proposed.html, was request to add architectures, and extend to releases
- Questions:
- how much time should be allocated for automated certification run, in planning? (assuming no significant regression)
Kernel
- Questions:
- Which bugs that are being targetted for next SRU testing cycle?
- Which kernels will need SRU testing?
- What date will the kernel(s) be available for build? test?
- Any security issues that may impact next cycle?
- What is the priority list of SRU candidate bugs that will be worked on in next two weeks?
Security
- Questions:
- Any show stoppers likely which will cause kernel SRU release cycle to be skipped?
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Foundations
- Questions:
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Server
- Questions:
Should this link be updated? : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/StableReleaseTracker -- [[zul] - this is obsolete
Is this the official one? : http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html -- [zul] - this is the one to use
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
ARM
- Questions:
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Desktop
- Questions:
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Ubuntu One
- Questions:
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Kubuntu
- Questions:
- Any packages which need to have SRU bugs validated?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
Derivatives
Linaro
- Questions:
- Any fixes that need to be released in maverick SRU?
- Any SRU candidate bugs against packages to be worked on in next two weeks?
OEM
- Question:
- Any escalation bugs that need to be worked on in next two weeks that should be SRU?
IRC Meeting Log
- mootbot logs available at
ACTIONS
- [cjwatson, apw, Keybuk, azul] - to come up with proposal to handle upstart interaction/bug 642555
- [victorp] look at adding hardware cert reports with architectures as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting
- [pedro, marjo] - look at adding regression test report as one of the pieces of info tracked for SRU meeting.
- [victorp, pedro, bjf, skaet] to set date for next target SRU release. We'll be skipping Dec. 2.
- [skaet, victorp, bjf, pitti] - meet to discuss SRU release of maverick post hardware cert testing results
ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2010-12-06-SR (last edited 2010-12-14 22:09:44 by eth3)